Tiffany Saunders
Active Member
khaki was popular long long before anyone heard of Jack Hanna, much less Steve Irwin.
I would like to know when it became the go-to color in the zoo... it very well may have been the Jack Hanna era.
khaki was popular long long before anyone heard of Jack Hanna, much less Steve Irwin.
In Australia, khaki has historically been the outdoors shirt colour. I guess that is because army shirts were readily available, cheap and hard wearing. Zoo uniforms have followed this, although there are uniforms that are green. One major zoo tried to introduce blue polo shirts with red and orange flashes (if I remember right). They lasted about two years.
More recently most outdoors workers now wear safety shirts in orange or yellow, I am glad zoos have not followed this trend although one side effect is that it is harder and harder to find work gear in more traditional colours. This is especially true for womens wear.
I am hard put to think of an Australian zoo of any size that does not have a staff uniform, although for smaller zoos it is just a polo shirt. I remember Jersey Zoo in the UK never used to have uniforms, until a small child fell into the gorilla enclosure. Visitors could not find a staff member to inform.
Moonlit Sanctuary recently introduced a new uniform, largely designed by staff themselves. It has a sand / beige shirt and black pants. I think they look very smart, and I have not noticed any problems with them getting excessively dirty.
In the absence of a picture of Steve Irwin - perhaps these last posts should be split into a 'big white hunter' or 'colonial uniforms' category...?
I would argue thats it's all the same in theory
Khaki or better yet beige is the color of the bourgeois, privileged overseer class when they are in the "field"
it is the classic color of colonialism, it simply represents the European domination over the wild and untamed land and their savage people.
With all the focus on "optics" and public opinion one would think the Modern Animal Park would be keen on avoiding this image
in a classic failure to recognize the history of this color they have failed.
This is what happens when people get promoted based on who they are not what they know.
I would still doubt that such thoughts were foremost in the minds of most (Australian? or American?) zoo uniform designers. In the UK, some zoos use very bright colours, pale blue, yellow even.
Definitely predated Jack Hanna
Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom on Sunday nights with Marlin Perkins and Jim Fowler | Wild Kingdom | Pinterest | My childhood memories, Childhood memories and My memory
For the show Mutual of Omaha Marlin Perkins normally wore a suit, but when in the field it was almost always khaki
Marlin Perkins was the director of the the St Louis, Lincoln Park and Buffalo zoos. He started his career as a day laborer (which I take to mean a maintenance man), then become a reptile keeper.
St Louis was sporting khakis in the mid to late 60s for sure.
Rationale for red
From the modern perspective, the retention of a highly conspicuous colour such as red for active service appears inexplicable and foolhardy, regardless of how striking it may have looked on the parade ground. However, in the days of the musket (a weapon of limited range and accuracy) and black powder, battle field visibility was quickly obscured by clouds of smoke. Bright colours provided a means of distinguishing friend from foe without significantly adding risk. Furthermore, the vegetable dyes used until the 19th century would fade over time to a pink or ruddy-brown, so on a long campaign in a hot climate the colour was less conspicuous than the modern scarlet shade would be. As formal battles of the time commonly involved deployment in columns and lines, the individual soldier was not likely to be a target by himself.
Just a note about the use of red for the British army back in the day (or blue for France, or any other colour, it wasn't just the Brits). To quote from the Wikipedia page on red military uniforms: