OK, so I might go to the zoo to see anteaters. I certainly don't go to the zoo to play crazy golf!
Well its animal themed crazy golf, with holes such as Gerald the walrus, does that make a difference?
OK, so I might go to the zoo to see anteaters. I certainly don't go to the zoo to play crazy golf!
I've criticised ZSL too many times, but this post just about sums of my views perfectly. For once I don't need to comment further!
Crazy management...
London still have a great collection with the highest standards of welfare aroundI dont see many people leaping to London zoos defence now.....
A great collection? I suspect many might beg to differ....London still have a great collection with the highest standards of welfare around
Are you saying they have nothing you approve of? With your infinite wisdomA great collection? I suspect many might beg to differ....
I appreciate that you feel very defensive of London zoo, Robert, and that is excellent. But, please, go easy on the sarcasm – it simply isn’t necessary. We’re all friends here!Are you saying they have nothing you approve of? With your infinite wisdom
Apologies for the comment. But I think they are going throwa ruff patch with the entire site at the moment so they just need a little timeI appreciate that you feel very defensive of London zoo, Robert, and that is excellent. But, please, go easy on the sarcasm – it simply isn’t necessary. We’re all friends here!
It’s not that there is, as you put it, nothing that I approve of. I’m not sure that approval is the issue. Rather, as has been discussed here at length, the collection is much diminished, with very little to excite. Mammal wise? Okapis are great, obviously, but not the rarities they once were. Aye aye are fabulous. After that, I’m struggling a little bit. And there is a lot of focus given to the most straightforward of species. Meerkats, short-clawed otters, ring-tailed lemurs. Birds? At the moment, really very little to excite. Reptiles and amphibians? Probably the best area in the zoo, but even here slipping. Fish? Hmmm. Invertebrates? Yes, fine, I suppose.
So, no, I really don’t think the collection could be described as ‘great’. However, that is only my subjective opinion, to which I am entitled; your subjective opinion, to which you are equally entitled, is that it is “great“. And that is fine, Robert. No need for unpleasantness.
Aye aye are fabulous. After that, I’m struggling a little bit
Mammal wise? Okapis are great, obviously, but not the rarities they once were. Aye aye are fabulous. After that, I’m struggling a little bit.
I wonder how many of the freshwater fish species on your list will be transferred to the Whipsnade aquarium; presumably they'll all leave London Zoo when the aquarium closes anyway.London Zoo has the only southern tamandua (nominate subspecies), Lake Oku clawed frog, Congo and two-lined caecilians, Iberian midwife toad, common driftwood catfish, blue-striped dottyback, dusky narrow hatchetfish, flag and garnet tetras, grime rainbowfish, lipstick and Y-bar leporinus, Mezquital pupfish, orangspot metynnis, pink corydoras, red-tailed brycon, staghorn damselfish, Tanganyikan cichlid unicolor coralgoby and blackstripe rasbora listed on ZTL.,
what is ZTL?London Zoo has the only southern tamandua (nominate subspecies), Lake Oku clawed frog, Congo and two-lined caecilians, Iberian midwife toad, common driftwood catfish, blue-striped dottyback, dusky narrow hatchetfish, flag and garnet tetras, grime rainbowfish, lipstick and Y-bar leporinus, Mezquital pupfish, orangspot metynnis, pink corydoras, red-tailed brycon, staghorn damselfish, Tanganyikan cichlid unicolor coralgoby and blackstripe rasbora listed on ZTL.,
I think this patch started around 1985 with the closure of the Mappin Terraces, that is a lot of time surely?Apo
Apologies for the comment. But I think they are going throwa ruff patch with the entire site at the moment so they just need a little time