It will the same situation for Beauval. I've never been but I doubt Bronx has more than 10 European species.I know very little in this regard for either collection, but I have a feeling Bronx has more species falling into one of the categories at hand than does Beauval.
Is this right?Song Thrush
It will the same situation for Beauval. I've never been but I doubt Bronx has more than 10 European species.
My point is that Beauval has v.few European OR North American taxa, so Bronx will still best it.
Is this right?
That's a wonderful list, and it's only mammals and birds so far! Voting 2-1 Bronx, escpecially for the European species and rodents. If someone makes a convincing argument for Beauval though...
Not true. I'm doing the species list now and its bird count exceeds Bronx's I think.
West Indian manatee
Bar-headed goose
Hawaiian goose
Probably comes under South American and Central American.
An important question for @CGSwans: is Mexico counted as part of North America or Central/South America? If it's the latter, there are a few more species in AL's list that need to be discounted, such as boat-billed heron and spectacled owl.
Btw, I don't think the Monk parakeets should count. I didn't count introduced species in my list and it is by no means their native range.
That species of manatee is actually well-established in Florida, although the particular subspecies/origin of the European zoo manatees is not.
An important question for @CGSwans: is Mexico counted as part of North America or Central/South America? If it's the latter, there are a few more species in AL's list that need to be discounted, such as boat-billed heron and spectacled owl.
Fairly sure he already suggested the latter?
The categories are zoogeographic so Mexico should fall in Central America which falls in South America. North America/Europe is basically a Palaearctic category.
Yeah, exactly. It would seem obtuse to include Central America under South America because of the faunal similarities but to then include Mexico in North America with a lot of those same species.much of Mexico's fauna is either Palaearctic or Neotropical depending on what part of the country you're in.
I don't think any of these species count.Bar-headed goose
Cape Barren goose
Hawaiian goose
Southern boat billed heron
Spectacled owl
Western spindalis
White-cheeked pintail
Probably comes under South American and Central American.
That's fair and I have no problem removing them, but then aren't Barbary Macaques introduced to Gibraltar..?
EDIT: Also Europe's "Arctic Wolves" are wolf-dog hybrids.
From the rebooted thread:
- Central America fits better with South, not North America based on the types of species that live there, so the third category is ‘South and Central America’. Caribbean islands also belong here.
- North America and Europe, as Amur Leopard notes, aren’t categories that often cross the pond. A European zoo drawing ‘Europe’ against an American zoo will win by default, and vice-versa. Luckily, the species line-ups are broadly similar so North America and Europe will form a combined category, allowing zoos from both continents to be meaningfully compared.
The categories are zoogeographic so Mexico should fall in Central America which falls in South America. North America/Europe is basically a Palaearctic category.