This really cements how out-of-touch with reality the ZAA is with the reality facing teh worlds wildlife. Goodfellow's tree kangaroo is an endangered species. It is a marsupial, a class of mammals that our zoos are arguably the world experts at keeping. Not only that, we actually have good success with breeding this species and relatively speaking a decent amount if them zoos in this county. This species also comes from our most immediate neighbouring country, a country who's strongest diplomatic ties are to our own.
As these Australian bushfires have illustrated, we no longer get ample warning when a species might go from endangered to extinct. Especially not when action takes years of red tape before anything practical can be done. All populations of endangered species in captivity need to be treated at precious. Its not a given we are going to be able to add-to or replace those populations. Especially not with the self-serving attitudes and procrastination our zoos exhibit.
If the Goodfellow's tree kangaroo population is in need of new genetics from the wild to safeguard the captive population, then I would argue that no developed country on earth is better equiped to take the lead on that than Australia. The question the ZAA should be asking itself should not be "Goodfellow's or Lumholtz?" but instead "How can we secure a healthy population of Goodfellow's and Lumholtz?"