Exactly for the reasons that there are literally hundreds of chimpanzees of known origins languishing in sanctuaries is why zoos should step in and be the evidence-based solution for properly managing ex situ chimp populations to subspecies level.Galatea is Pan troglodytes verus, ascertained by genetic testing of her parents. All others are a case of guesswork unless the region decides to follow the European example of managing on a subspecies level. With all the recent imports (bar Galatea) being confirmed hybrids-- which is why they were surplus in Europe-- I can't see that happening.
I can't foresee chimpanzees being released into the wild from zoos. There are literally hundreds of pure subspecies individuals in range sanctuaries that would be released first if it were ever possible. The conservation value of chimpanzees in zoos, for the foreseeable, is as educational ambassadors. The EEP is breeding chimps of pure subspecies with potential reintroduction in mind, so you never know. I wouldn't hold my breath.
The current policy in Australasia breeding from known hybrids is as far removed from that as possible, is in my view untenable and cannot be supported from a serious scientific perspective. Hence, it should not continue the way it does in light of all the evidence and for the good purposes of sound animal collection management and husbandry.
I also feel that the ex situ conservation breeding community should come together with the in situ science community. No point in bickering between zoo and wildlife biologists. The latter only fuels the antis and animal welfare zealots (who do not have any vision beyond individual chimps and seriously lack a wider perspective on ever decreasing wild populations and the questions at hand: how do we effectively conserve individual chimp populations in the wild, ensure the integrity of these and their genetics and assist in moving chimp management in situ and ex situ to an all global level.