@WhistlingKite24 Everyone is right, your photos are absolutely amazing. Its a rare thing to see a photo of a Lumholtz' Tree Kangaroo and your shot is incredible.
Wildlife HQ is coming along nicely I believe choosing small species is a wise move by them. Moving the Indian Blackbuck out of the zoo was a good move.
Even a few additional showy parrots would do the trick. The zoo used to have a pair of Eclectus Parrots and macaws (from Alma Park Zoo) which at least provided the sound and colour. They have Brush-tailed Rock-Wallabies right at the front of the zoo which they bred a few years ago plus the new Yellow-footed Rock-Wallabies opposite the gibbons.Wildlife HQ are doing quite well and making their mark. Did you find out which species the second rock Wallaby species they have?.
A little surprised they don't have more birds in the collection but are particularly strong with primates.![]()
I like the way they are developing, they do well with primates and small mammals. Adding some bird species would be a plus and as you pointed out perhaps some of the larger parrots species like Macaws.Even a few additional showy parrots would do the trick. The zoo used to have a pair of Eclectus Parrots and macaws (from Alma Park Zoo) which at least provided the sound and colour. They have Brush-tailed Rock-Wallabies right at the front of the zoo which they bred a few years ago plus the new Yellow-footed Rock-Wallabies opposite the gibbons.
There does not appear to be any guide to how large the zoo area is?Is there much room left at this zoo for further development?
Some parts of the zoo are getting pretty snug with new exhibits but a lot of the new enclosures have been replacing domestic animals (e.g. gibbon exhibit built on former alpaca yard, spider monkeys replacing goats, tree-kangaroo replacing pigs). There is a patch of rainforest that runs in between both main sections of the zoo and the siamang enclosure was the first animal exhibit to be constructed within this area. There is fair bit of space in that central patch of forest that can support expansion to connect both sections of the zoo.Is there much room left at this zoo for further development?
Is there much room left at this zoo for further development?
I like the way they are developing, they do well with primates and small mammals. Adding some bird species would be a plus and as you pointed out perhaps some of the larger parrots species like Macaws.
I am glad they phased out the blackbuck, as the zoo is not really suited to larger hoofed animal species.
I visited perhaps about 2 years ago when they had a group of blackbuck and they were cramped. I am unsure of the area of the zoo but much of what they have got at the current time is built among forest, I am not aware if they have any open areas for large mammals.The zoo have done well in terms of being realistic in what they have the resources to exhibit. They have a strong focus on reptiles with at least 24 species; and 12 species of primate - consisting mostly of small monkeys, with a few medium sized species like Hamadryas baboon.
When you factor in that the zoo holds a ursid species (Malayan sun bear) and two canid species (African wild dog and Dingo); all they really need to complete their collection is a couple of ungulates (perhaps zebra and nyala) and large felid species. Sri Lankan leopard would be a great fit for the zoo and easy to acquire within the region.
I visited perhaps about 2 years ago when they had a group of blackbuck and they were cramped. I am unsure of the area of the zoo but much of what they have got at the current time is built among forest, I am not aware if they have any open areas for large mammals.
I agree tapir’s would be a better option it would be interesting to know how large the area of the zoo isIf tapir imports are forthcoming and bred successfully at Darling Downs Zoo and Adelaide etc. then that could be a better option for them than zebra and nyala. It’d be a long time goal that would give them plenty of time to work towards.
The Sri Lankan leopard would similarly require a smaller space than tigers or lions - especially considering the latter would have to be kept in a minimum of a pair or a trio.
I agree tapir’s would be a better option it would be interesting to know how large the area of the zoo is
The property is 41ha in size, though bearing in mind more than half is covered in forest, the useable land is currently at around 18ha if I was to hazard a guess.
That's still a decent amount of size; about equivalent to Melbourne Zoo.
They lot of potential with that unused space, but it'll depend on whether they want to extend into the space taken up by the forest.
The property is 41ha in size, though bearing in mind more than half is covered in forest, the useable land is currently at around 18ha if I was to hazard a guess.