As I mentioned, I wholeheartedly supported Copenhagen Zoo when Marius was euthanized, and while there are certain aspects of my country's culture that I dislike, the honesty and straightforwardness displayed by Copenhagen Zoo combined with professional decision-making did impress me. I'm not unwilling to discuss that (though I feel like my English proficiency is still a bit lacking when it comes to deeper, more complex discussions like that), but that should be in another thread so that we don't bring Aalborg's thread completely off the rails.
Again, the reason I'm somewhat an opponent of Aalborg Zoo's decision regarding the brown bear is because it truly puzzles me how they could deem the brown bear exhibit so terrible that they needed to put down some still relatively healthy bears immediately instead of let them live out their final years. I'll link to a picture of the exhibit from the gallery: Aalborg Zoo - Brown bear exhibit | ZooChat
To me, that's just another bear exhibit. There's nothing about it that screams state-of-the-art, and there's nothing about it that screams "demolish that atrocity ASAP!". Maybe it could be a bit more vegetated and have more hiding places, but size-wise it's better than many of the older bear exhibits out there.
I genuinely can't see what's so wrong with it that made it impossible to keep bears in it for 5 more years.
I'm afraid some subjectivity might shine through here, though, as while I used to have a very loving and nostalgic relationship to Aalborg Zoo (visited it every year as a kid with my grandparents), I don't at all like that the zoo has completely ceased building new animal exhibits and instead has shifted their focus to entertaining families with dinosaur/Ice Age animatronics and playgrounds. If they intended to build a new brown bear exhibit and euthanized a pair of older bears because they had trouble finding temporary homes for them during construction, it would have been alright in my book, but I'm pretty sure they aren't intending to build any new animal exhibits until Joe Public grows tired of the animatronics.
Again, the reason I'm somewhat an opponent of Aalborg Zoo's decision regarding the brown bear is because it truly puzzles me how they could deem the brown bear exhibit so terrible that they needed to put down some still relatively healthy bears immediately instead of let them live out their final years. I'll link to a picture of the exhibit from the gallery: Aalborg Zoo - Brown bear exhibit | ZooChat
To me, that's just another bear exhibit. There's nothing about it that screams state-of-the-art, and there's nothing about it that screams "demolish that atrocity ASAP!". Maybe it could be a bit more vegetated and have more hiding places, but size-wise it's better than many of the older bear exhibits out there.
I genuinely can't see what's so wrong with it that made it impossible to keep bears in it for 5 more years.
I'm afraid some subjectivity might shine through here, though, as while I used to have a very loving and nostalgic relationship to Aalborg Zoo (visited it every year as a kid with my grandparents), I don't at all like that the zoo has completely ceased building new animal exhibits and instead has shifted their focus to entertaining families with dinosaur/Ice Age animatronics and playgrounds. If they intended to build a new brown bear exhibit and euthanized a pair of older bears because they had trouble finding temporary homes for them during construction, it would have been alright in my book, but I'm pretty sure they aren't intending to build any new animal exhibits until Joe Public grows tired of the animatronics.