I'm a bit confused on this public transportation debate. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it reads as though a number of people here think it should be a zoo's responsibility to create a public transportation system to make it easier for people to visit them. For one, zoos clearly do not have the money to run such an operation. Second, I find it unlikely that a zoo would even have the authority to do this. You can't just start running a public transport network, there's a lot of politics and legal red tape that would stand in the way of this. Thirdly, while it's true not everyone has a car, unfortunately the US automotive industry has spent a lot of money undermining public transport schemes and making trains and buses unpopular. I think many here who are from cities that are well connected within their metropolitan area and those from overseas may not understand just how poor America's public transportation infrastructure is. Many major cities don't have a major public railway leading to them, many of them don't even have a direct bus route.
I remember in 2019, trying to find public transportation to get from Wichita to Omaha was impossible. I found some redeye buses that could take me to Kansas City, but that's as far as I could go. There were NO buses that ran between KC and Omaha despite there being a major highway directly between the two that takes less than 3 hours to drive. Even if there was a bus, I'd lose an entire day to the travel time. I tried looking at flights, but even then most direct route offered was Wichita to Dallas to Phoenix to Omaha which would have taken over 24 hours to complete. In the end, I just rented a car and drove the six hours. If this is the case for just trying to get between two fairly close major cities, why is it reasonable to think there would be a bus route specifically between the Henry Doorly Zoo and Lee Simmons Wildlife Safari Park?
~Thylo