Hello Django it seems we have a new well considered, intelligent member on the boards..! Always a great addition..!
there were some concerning things to come out of the article but for they had much less to do with the elephants welfare.
i have complained constantly about the zoo's baboon enclosure and this is bad exposure for the zoo with a bad exhibit. however, my gripes do not come from an animal welfare perspective. the baboon group is positively thriving, its more people's perceptions of the animals (when viewing them in such an environment) which worries me.
At the start of 2006 I became interested in zoos (rabid some may say) and my first "zoo trip" was in March 2006, I decided to go to Melbourne and Werribee... Why, because I had a Melbourne Zoo book when I was a little kid...
I enjoyed the zoo, at that time it was the largest I'd been too...
I caught the train so I started my trip at the lower entrance... I loved the species I'd never seen before which seemed relatively happy, healthy and in average to good enclosures (for my uniniatiated eyes at that time)...
I thought the big and small cat enclosures where too small, too 1970's... I saw the bears with display stereotypical behaviours... The Sea Lion pool was dissapointing... I found the Lion enclosure drab... However I loved Reptile and Frog Houses, I liked the Australian area of the zoo and found the Asia and African Rainforest modern and aestheticly pleasing...
Towards the middle of the zoo was a "1900's" (empty) Lion cage which the zoo had to show how far they and others had come... I was impressed I thought it bold to admit failings in the past...
My feeling of being impressed changed less than a few 100 yards away when I saw the baboon enclosure... I was truly shocked, especially when you consider that another 100 yards or so away is the best enclosure (Pygmy Hippos/Mandrills) at the zoo...
On this site we talk alot about how if zoos designed exhibits solely with what was best for the animals in mind, zoos could have many more animals, that were twice as "happy", in exhibits far better suited to them and for half the cost but would look far worse to the human eye...
Glyn you say these animals are thriving..?
IMHO the zoo should jackhammer up the concrete, adding heavy planting (hopefully selecting plants the animals wouldn't destroy), add logs, ropes and rotating BE's... This shouldn't cost too much and some much needed green IS required... If only to not turn people's opinion from Wow to Eww, as mine was about 2 years ago...
i think one thing that might need considering with all our major zoos here in Australia is 'future proofing' in terms of physical assets. we all know that collection planning is heading in the right direction but is this being translated, physically into assets which are going to last the next few decades and evolve along with public perception?
I agree that this is a MAJOR issue... You talk about individual exhibits and species in an Australasian context... My personal opinion is "future proofing" extends to ALL Western Zoos...
Zoo governing bodies, councils etc are making MASSIVE investments in zoos... If the majority of these exhibits are not considered functional and "attractive" in 50 years time (unless they have ascepts of functionality and "attractiveness"), along with proven educational and conversation aspects in 50 years time, zoos may well be headed in the direction of animals at the circuses (at least in the majority of public opinion) and that would be a tradegy... I believe the exhibits produced between 2000 and 2020 will define zoos, both as good and bad, both worth keeping or not...
+increased participation in programs for maned wolves, snow leopards and other similar species to ensure sustainablity.
These are two of my favoruite species, in particular Snow Leopards and I find it annoying no Snow Leopards are in NZ, especially considering our climate compared to Australia...
Its interesting Laura Mumaw was mentioned in a negative light... She was at Auckland Zoo before Melbourne and the amount of money poured into the zoo while she was in charge was amazing, it was a turn around (exhibit wise) at Auckland Zoo, maybe though the animals suffered, as an outsider I don't know... No similar stories like this came out at that time I can remember...
And finally on the topic of animal violence, etc... I feel I've come accross as not siding with animal violence in any situation, if a human life was at stake sure, any means necesary... From the article it does not sound like the mans life was at stake (maybe his ego)...
I don't want to sound like I'm backtracking, being in the Police I've had to hit PEOPLE before...
What I do believe is that an Elephant shouldn't be stabbed, under any circumstances, ever (except life threatening)... If you cannot control your Elephant switch control methods or relocate the animal somewhere that can... I also don't believe Jarkari should be hitting her dog at home cause she can't be bothered training it properly or is quick to anger...