New Tiger Exhibits

snowleopard

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
It seems as if every year another American zoo announces the opening of a new tiger exhibit, and so I spent some time putting together a list of more than 30 tiger habitats that have already opened (or will open) within a span of 16 years. That is quite a few! What ones are missing from this list?

The list includes renovated existing habitats.

Disney’s Animal Kingdom – 1999
Blank Park Zoo – 1999
Dallas Zoo – 1999
Fresno Chaffee Zoo – 2001
Oakland Zoo – 2001
Zoo Boise – 2002
Bronx Zoo – 2003
Houston Downtown Aquarium – 2003
Point Defiance Zoo – 2004
Denver Downtown Aquarium – 2005
Topeka Zoo – 2005
Columbus Zoo – 2006
Philadelphia Zoo – 2006
Utah’s Hogle Zoo – 2006
Franklin Park Zoo – 2006
Dakota Zoo – 2008
Busch Gardens Tampa Bay – 2008
Louisville Zoo – 2008
Erie Zoo – 2008
Sedgwick County Zoo – 2009
Baton Rouge Zoo – 2010
Jackson Zoo – 2010
Zoo Atlanta – 2010
Indianapolis Zoo – 2011
Virginia Zoo – 2011
Cincinnati Zoo – 2012
Kansas City Zoo – 2012
Phoenix Zoo – 2013
San Diego Zoo Safari Park - 2013
Woodland Park Zoo – 2014
John Ball Zoo – 2014
Tulsa Zoo – 2015
 
Great list snowleopard.

Just one thing. While Denver's Downtown Aquarium reopened with new branding and name in 2005, it was largely just a surface treatment of the wonderful Colorado's Ocean Journey. I believe the tiger exhibit there remains relatively untouched since the opening of Ocean Journey in 1999.
 
Does anyone know if Jacksonville Zoo is definitely going to include a tiger exhibit in its upcoming Monsoon Asia precinct? On average every 6 months a new tiger habitat opens in an American zoo!
 
There seems to be a trend of new exhibits going on, and they often seem to be for the following 4 species: Elephants, Gorillas, Sea Lions, and Tigers.
On another note, does anyone know what kind of subspecies Jacksonville will include?
 
I am a wild cat fan, so I have zero complaints about this trend. I say keep it coming. However, I find it interesting that no ZooChatters seem to mind in the least seeing lions and tigers at nearly every zoo, while many of them complain loudly about seeing meerkats at nearly every zoo.
 
There seems to be a trend of new exhibits going on, and they often seem to be for the following 4 species: Elephants, Gorillas, Sea Lions, and Tigers.

All Superstar Species visitors know. At least, most. Always bugs me when visitors called the Snow Leopards, Snow Tigers or Snow Lions. Penguins are also joining the trend, as well.
 
Visitors (even adults) at my zoo often refer to the lions as tigers. Just amazes me how clueless some people are. (I can certainly understand people confusing jaguars with leopards, but lions and tigers?)
 
Toronto Zoo expanded/renovated their sumatran tiger exhibit in 2002/2003
 
I am a wild cat fan, so I have zero complaints about this trend. I say keep it coming. However, I find it interesting that no ZooChatters seem to mind in the least seeing lions and tigers at nearly every zoo, while many of them complain loudly about seeing meerkats at nearly every zoo.

I do. Well, sort of. It probably only matters to enthusiasts like ourselves, but I would like to see a larger representation of the species in zoos. For example, where are all the Royal Bengal exhibits? Enough with the Sumatran exhibits and the token Amur!

That said, thanks for the list!
 
There are no Bengal Tigers outside of the Subcontinent. Everything labeled a "Bengal" is in fact a hybrid.
 
Not to risk becoming one of the recipients of the Ig Noble ? awards you just posted, but the correct term there is 'intergrade'. :). Hybrid only refers to crosses between full species. And, actually, there may be a few 'pure' Bengals, the stuff Doc Antle has may be pure (if his origin story is correct, and I have no idea if it is), but of course they are so inbred, and those grotesque color mutations would also make them useless for conservation purposes. Also, there may be a few groups of privately held cats in Texas which MAY be as high percentage Bengal as, for example, our Amur leopards are high percentage Amur. I have seen some which certainly looked a lot like photos I have seen of Bengals, and nothing like Sumatrans or Amurs, which with I am intimately familiar. Of course, a, say 90% Bengal would probably look like a pure Bengal, and I of course make no claim to being an expert on the taxon. And, to be honest, the older I get and the more I see, the more of a 'lumper' (as opposed to a 'splitter' ) I become, as regards to mammals.
 
The standard definition of a hybrid is a cross between any two taxa whether subspecies or full species. At any rate, there are no "pure" Bengals in the AZA.
 
After looking at the animal mascot thread I found out that LSU in 2005 built a new tiger exhibit complete with underwater viewing.
 
Baton Rouge does have a very nice new tiger complex, exhibiting both Malayan and Sumatrans, I saw it last year. Could have used a bit more shade for the tigers, and a little more climbing opportunities for the siamangs for my taste though.
 
Baton Rouge does have a very nice new tiger complex, exhibiting both Malayan and Sumatrans, I saw it last year. Could have used a bit more shade for the tigers, and a little more climbing opportunities for the siamangs for my taste though.

They have a mixed species exhibit with tigers and siamangs! :eek: ;)
 
Back
Top