Very pleased you decided to visit after all those years GL and your review is bang on the money. I bet you barely recognised parts of the zoo. What prompted your sudden return and will you go back again?
. . . . .
It is a shame that Dudley is still let down by some of its older exhibits; especially the orangs. However, it is important to remember that DZG is still in the middle of a huge improvement phase in its life and they're hurtling full steam ahead. The new director has already stated that they aim to improve the older, existing exhibits before looking at new ones. Won't stop me being critical though!
Glad you enjoyed your visit.
I had been thinking of a trip to Dudley to see the changes for a while and I was passing through Birmingham on a reasonably nice morning, so I thought why not? The only snags were that the forecast sunny intervals did not materialise and my satnav didn't know about the new car park and kept telling me to a do a U-turn while I trusted the road signs.
As I said, there was a time when I felt the zoo had become drab and depressing, but I knew from the posts in this thread and its predecessors that the corner was turned some time ago and the zoo has been making real progress. I was glad to see this for myself. I did recognise most of the zoo and some parts have hardly changed. I was wondering whether all the changes were cosmetic or whether there were some genuinely new ideas too: I'm not suggesting that some cosmetic changes weren't required and indeed it is the wrong word to use for the restoration of the Tecton buildings which is both important and significant in the UK zoo scene.
Dudley needed, and still needs, both renovation and innovation, as do the other zoos of similar age such as Whipsnade and Chester. Dudley fell behind the others years ago, so it is working to catch up. On the whole I think that the right choices have been made and the zoo has got the balance between innovation and renovation about right. Proper facilities for visitors are important too and I am sure the work upgrading the entrance will improve the visitor's experience.
When I posted yesterday I thought the zoo only had three orangs, but I see from previous posts and photos that they have two adult males. That confirms my view that better orang accommodation is desperately required. Shorts is quite right to say that the current house is not Tecton and it is not listed, so it could be modified in any way, but I doubt if it could ever meet 21st century standards for orang husbandry: which is why I would only consider using it for other creatures. A new orang house would be expensive, but an imaginative new building plus a new species in the old one could become an attraction to draw in the public.
I hope to post a few photos from my visit soon.
Alan