This photo only shows a portion of the exhibit, which overall is very impressive. I still think that Columbus and San Diego have absolutely exceptional bonobo habitats that are the best of their kind.
This photo only shows a portion of the exhibit, which overall is very impressive. I still think that Columbus and San Diego have absolutely exceptional bonobo habitats that are the best of their kind.
I actually believe this is the best in the U.S, Columbus's has one climbing structure and looks like it has little shade, while for this exhibit is for some reason always shady, no matter how sunny it is (there are more trees to the exhibit today) . As for San Diego's, it looks really unnatural. Still they are beautiful world class exhibits
I actually believe this is the best in the U.S, Columbus's has one climbing structure and looks like it has little shade, while for this exhibit is for some reason always shady, no matter how sunny it is (there are more trees to the exhibit today) . As for San Diego's, it looks really unnatural. Still they are beautiful world class exhibits
I really don't get this "best exhibit" thing. The zoo world needs all of the high quality bonobo exhibits that it can build. It looks like Cincy Zoo has a really good one from the photos. The San Diego Zoo has a very good bonobo exhibit that looks pretty natural also, although would agree with your assessment regarding the Safari Park exhibit (which is actually no longer a exhibit in the sense that people can't see it anymore since they disbanded the monorail).
Jusko88: I completely agree with you. It seems much more lush and shady too. Not to mention a giant tree that it much, much bigger than seen in the photo. While Columbus's has like what, one or two ropes for climbing?
