No, they keep it for historic reasons (and possibly because it is listed so they can't touch it) but it is maintained well - Vienna does this remarkably well!
No, they keep it for historic reasons (and possibly because it is listed so they can't touch it) but it is maintained well - Vienna does this remarkably well!
I actually think that it is great when zoos keep outdated exhibits for historic reasons, as there are many iconic structures that zoo fans associate with specific zoological parks. When zoos convert aging buildings into modern areas then that is even more remarkable, such as the case with Toledo Zoo and its Feline House (now the "Carnivore Cafe"). What I rant against is when obviously outdated parts of zoos continue to house animals when in reality there should be a phasing out of inhabitants.
I don't remember Cheetahs from my visit 8 years ago but I remember Amur Tigers being kept in the manner you describe, and I was quite impressed with it to be honest.
