That's a very recent change. In early March, the female was still on display but when I last visited 2 weeks ago, the infamous "Exhibit Temporarily Closed" sign was out. And it was just earlier this year that I saw both the male and female still there. I hope this isn't the end of the road for Congo Peafowl at the Los Angeles Zoo. That would be a real shame.
That's a very recent change. In early March, the female was still on display but when I last visited 2 weeks ago, the infamous "Exhibit Temporarily Closed" sign was out. And it was just earlier this year that I saw both the male and female still there. I hope this isn't the end of the road for Congo Peafowl at the Los Angeles Zoo. That would be a real shame.
I agree that it will be a shame if the zoo decides not to exhibit Congo Peafowl. According to ISIS, there is still 16.14.2 with 4 recent births in US Zoos.
Apparently the exhibit for Congo Peafowl was only closed temporarily. I didn't spy the female but the Exhibit Closed sign has been removed, and the plant growth is quite dense in there. Hopefully back on display again and hiding.
Apparently the exhibit for Congo Peafowl was only closed temporarily. I didn't spy the female but the Exhibit Closed sign has been removed, and the plant growth is quite dense in there. Hopefully back on display again and hiding.
Well, last time I was there I could only see the pair of Lady Ross's Turaco, but I haven't been able to see the Congo Peafowl. The weird thing is that the Congo Peafowl sign is still on the exhibit, so maybe the zoo will still exhibit them.
