My memory may be playing tricks on me here, but I think that even the jaguars were in similarly designed but larger enclosures. It was a while ago but I don't think I'm imagining it?
As I said on the thread, I think these are designed to be able to be taken down quickly, same as the tropical house. Something to do with not actually owning the land but leasing it.
On a different note, is it still ran by Ken Sims and/or Thrigby Wildlife Gardens?
I can't understand the comment regarding the Thrigby displays. Whilst I agree entirely on Thrigby having more interesting species, there are several exhibits there that are of virtually identical design to those at Amazona: 4 gibbon cages , the 2 snow leopard cages, 3 Amur leopard cages and the crab-eating Macaques!
@pipaluk The only cages I recall like these are the macaque and a gibbon enclosure, but (I think?) the macaques at least had an overhead tunnel over the path to another enclosure. I also appreciate the sturdiness of the houses and cat cloisters compared to the makeshift approach at Amazona. Could be memory playing tricks but Thrigby just seems more permanently zoo-like, for want of a better expression.
After a quick gLance through the gallery it does appear I 21st being slightly generous with my praise towards the leopard enclosures, but stand by my assessment of the macaque and gibbon enclosures.
And for clarity I meant the swamp house and tropical house at Thrigby being sturdy, not the cat accommodation. Sorry for the misunderstanding.