As a bird man, I'd call this 'leucistic', although I'm aware this term covers a multitude of sins. The reptile people would probably have a more succinct term.
the eyes are really the clincher in determining albino versus leucistic, at least when all you have to go on is a photo (albino animals lack pigmentation so have pink eyes; leucistic animals have normally coloured eyes because they are not affected by the factors that cause the defect). A leucistic bird would not have pink eyes as this individual does.
My definition of an albino is an animal showing no pigment in coat or soft parts, like a red-eyed white Budgerigar. This Kookaburra is showing pigment in the feathers, so cannot be an albino, unless you call it a 'partial' albino. I would be happier calling it 'pied', but still think those are not normally coloured tail feathers -- 'cinnamon pied'? [Have you seen the mutation White-cheeked Touracos?]. Lots of red-eyed things aren't albinos, like the whole range of lutino birds. I'm probably just being pedantic, and none of this matters. Even domestic animal/cagebird breeders often can't agree on terminology.
Reptile people would call it "snake food", no matter what colour it was. But if they were pushed, they'd call it albino (they call white snakes with yellow markings an albino).
I went with partial albino as it only appears to be the bars on the tail that remain. I'd need to have a really good look at the bird again in real life, as I think there may be a faint cinnamon wash on some of the feathers, possible where the blue colouring normally is found. This might be a case of phaeomelanin only being suppressed.
I'll have to look at one of my books when I get home.
