vogelcommando 6 Aug 2014 Nice picture but unfortunarly not anymore on display ( not seen during my last visit last week ).
I I IanRRobinson 11 Aug 2014 vogelcommando said: Nice picture but unfortunarly not anymore on display ( not seen during my last visit last week ). Click to expand... Shame. The distribution of this genus, heavily slanted towards the New World with just one species in the Palaearctic, is really odd.
vogelcommando said: Nice picture but unfortunarly not anymore on display ( not seen during my last visit last week ). Click to expand... Shame. The distribution of this genus, heavily slanted towards the New World with just one species in the Palaearctic, is really odd.
TeaLovingDave 11 Aug 2014 IanRRobinson said: Shame. The distribution of this genus, heavily slanted towards the New World with just one species in the Palaearctic, is really odd. Click to expand... Do not forget there are also several taxa in the genus resident to Africa and Asia
IanRRobinson said: Shame. The distribution of this genus, heavily slanted towards the New World with just one species in the Palaearctic, is really odd. Click to expand... Do not forget there are also several taxa in the genus resident to Africa and Asia
I I IanRRobinson 11 Aug 2014 I did say heavily slanted towards the New World Click to expand... ..about two thirds of them merit that description!
I did say heavily slanted towards the New World Click to expand... ..about two thirds of them merit that description!
