6 tiger subspecies confirmed

Interesting, though the article linked above that reports the study's findings has a huge typographical error. It says there were 1000,000 tigers a century ago when it should say there were 100,000 tigers a century ago. The fact there is a missing comma where there should be one if they really meant one million indicates they likely meant one hundred thousand (a widely touted number) and accidentally added an extra zero.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top