Are there any Galapagos species besides tortoises in zoos?

A fair question, and my answer? I am 100% certain that zoos could successfully keep marine iguanas in captivity. They've already done it, with some zoos having kept their animals for years, excluding our smuggler friends. Today, we have better technology, better transportation, a better understanding of the natural habitat and history of the species, better ability to mimic abiotic factors, better ability to recreate diet - I'm absolutely sure it could be done. There would be some trial and error, but that's how we got a lot of species, including platypus (or gorilla, for that matter) to go from "impossible to keep alive" to manageable, or in the case of some species, thriving.

Another thing to consider. Marine iguanas, in their wild state, are subject to mass die-offs due to El Nino years. In some years up to 90% of the population may crash. When I was in the Galapagos I saw thousands of marine iguanas - but there were also parts of the trip where I was literally walking on a carpet of desiccated iguana carcasses. Knowing this, marine iguanas could be collected from the wild in a perfectly sustainable manner at the onset of El Nino years, secure in the knowledge that they were probably going to die anyway of starvation, and therefore their removal likely would not be detrimental at all to the wild population.
Good answer, but I'm a bit hesitant on the "trial and error" part as I don't know how the imagen of "x" zoo will be affected by that part. Zoos struggle with all the lies that the protesters say, and giving them something to rant about will be preaty disastrous.
 
Good answer, but I'm a bit hesitant on the "trial and error" part as I don't know how the imagen of "x" zoo will be affected by that part. Zoos struggle with all the lies that the protesters say, and giving them something to rant about will be preaty disastrous.

Trial and error still happens a lot in zoos, but as it is usually done with small (and often less hairy) species these protesters couldn't care less....
 
Good answer, but I'm a bit hesitant on the "trial and error" part as I don't know how the imagen of "x" zoo will be affected by that part. Zoos struggle with all the lies that the protesters say, and giving them something to rant about will be preaty disastrous.
By "trial and error," I mean figuring out how best to optimize their husbandry - best diet, best abiotic environment, best social structure in captivity, etc. We have enough experience with marine iguanas at this point to be past a lot of the most basic mistakes. Every year of data you compile, you re-hone your technique, tweak your SOPs, and get better results. One year you get breeding behavior, the next they lay eggs but they're slugs, the next they're fertile but something goes wrong with development, and so on, and then next thing you know you're on the AZA listserv begging other zoos to take animals because you're up to your eyeballs in them.
 
The very last Galapagos shark in captivity in the Western Hemisphere is currently at Shark Reef at Mandalay Bay, and has been there for over 10 years. He's still doing well per the husbandry staffers there that I spoke with. I have a photo of him in my media, and @RatioTile got some really fantastic ones too on his visit a few months later.

Crazy to see a post from this thread from 2011 (~13 years ago...goddamn I feel old) talking about possibly that very shark. Sadly the Monterey Bay Aquarium sharks are no longer there, either due to passing from old age or from being given away during the Outer Bay - Open Sea transition.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top