You have to go back thirty years to another world and another culture. It worked. It changed an unacceptable situation to an acceptable one. I would do the same again then in that situation. I am not saying the same would work in Wareham or Woking.
I agree with Peter on this one!
What I do concur though is that we - that is local individuals - need to take the initiative in improving animal management, husbandry and housing in S.E. Asian zoos. It may not be overnight, but I am sure it can be done. Just we need more pro-activeness from groups like SEAZA to really start improving zoo standards. But accountability must come first and I am not sure that orgs like PETA/PAWS or arm chair critics should make assumptions on the zoos they visit unless they manage to talk to senior curatorial staff or management to convey their concerns.
Issues here are ... bureacracy, corruption, afraid to lose face in public affairs and a lack of proper funds to start improving S.E. Asian zoos. Call me naive, but if every zoo in the developed world had a town-to-town relationship with a zoo in the developing world, the latter might be in a better position to change the general status quo. The recent revoking of ownership of Schmutzer Center is quite the contrary to this example as I am not yet convinced local authorities are able to ensure proper husbandry, management and funding for their zoos.
*******************************************************
For the record: Peter this ain't directed at you, I know and respect the long zoo career that you have had and appreciate all your columns on zoos, wildlife, the life in S.E. Asia in general and what else comes up in your blogs! It is for those forumsters who more or less quip "rotten", but do not write reviews of S.E. Asian zoos (I have visited some, so I know what goes around too).
*******************************************************