Flemish Minister for Animal Welfare Ben Weyts (of the N-VA party) has stated in a current issues and politics talk show on national television that he wants to see the keeping of cetaceans - in casu bottlenose dolphins - end in Flanders.
Currently there is only one facility keeping captive dolphins left in Flanders (and in fact in all of Belgium), the Boudewijn Seapark in Bruges. Ben Weyts has said he would like to open the debate on cetaceans in captivity and favors a phase-out scenario for the dolphin keeping, husbandry and shows at that facility, meaning that no new animals can be bred or imported anymore.
Minister Weyts wil dolfinaria op termijn zien verdwijnen: "Kunnen we dit behouden, enkel voor ons plezier?"
Minister Ben Weyts wil houden van dolfijnen in gevangenschap verbieden: einde voor Brugs Dolfinarium?
Now I know very well that cetacean captivity is one very stinky can of worms and always a source of controversy, but I'm honestly wondering why the minister is now coming with these statements. I think he's either getting influenced by the animal rights crowd a bit too much, or he is trying to score some brownie points before the upcoming 26th of May elections and this is just some political rhetoric. In any case it surely seems opportunistically timed, which undermines the credibility of this guy and his statements.
Notice that many of the arguments used by Ben Weyts - "large, intelligent, stress-sensitive animals that need lots of space" could also easily apply to a variety of other species (elephants, apes and so on) and that those kinds of arguments are very commonly used by the detractors of zoos. So I find it at least somewhat worrisome that a minister of animal welfare is talking this way - because, what could be the next step? Where is this going to end regarding zoos?
I myself have mixed feelings about the keeping of cetaceans in captivity and I think the facilities at Boudewijn Seapark are probably fairly outdated, but I would prefer for the debate to be opened honestly and with an open mind, hearing experts and all kinds of different parties, before coming to an informed decision on this matter. Right now it seems like the minister has already made up his mind about what the outcome of the debate ought to be and what he would like to decide.