Houston Zoo Brief Impressions of Zoo

Arizona Docent

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Spent last Thursday at Houston Zoo, actually my third visit to this very good zoo over the last several years. First visit since the new African Forest addition. Here are some brief thoughts.

There is one overall impression of Houston Zoo that sticks in my mind. That is that they have an extremely well-rounded and complete animal collection. The only zoo I have seen that can top them in this area is the daunting San Diego Zoo. First, they have an aquarium (which few zoos have). Next is the Natural Encounters, filled with a variety of small animals (mammals and fish and more). Very extensive bird area, with outdoor exhibits as well as an indoor tropical bird house. Good reptile building with several examples of every category: frogs, snakes, lizards, turtles, crocodilians. Good primate trail with big and small monkeys. Separate great ape exhibits. Big and small carnivores: a couple bear species, a few small cats plus most big ones plus fossa, wild dogs and fox. Several antelope including some of the world's biggest: greater kudu, giant eland, bongo. Mega-herbivores: giraffe, elephant, rhino. Extensive children's zoo with southwest animals ranging from otters to swift fox to spiders. Plus odd-category mammals like giant anteater and babirusa. Even a sea lion pool.

Amazingly, this well-roundedness (if that is a word) is NOT carried over into their new multi-million dollar expansion. I was surprised at how few animal exhibits there are in such a large area. There are only three: giraffe/ostrich, kudu/rhino, chimpanzee. (The newly built rotating cheetah wild dog exhibit is technically not part of this exhibit area). There seems to be a lot of empty space that is unutilized. I am talking mainly about the entrance area (if you go in the way the map suggests). It is a very wide, very long meandering path with nothing to see (except some old oak trees, which of course are nice). They could easily have put an avairy along here or small mammal exhibits. The fact that the path winds and will not let you walk straight just adds to the sense of emptiness.

The first area, the chimpanzee exhibit, has a very large indoor area with educational displays and mud bank walls (similar to the new indoor hippo area at San Antonio). While they should keep the educational displays, they could have added some small animal tanks along the back wall, as San Antonio did. Just a huge cavernous indoor area with not much to see. The following outdoor areas have very nice French Colonial architecture for a gift shop and a fantastic restaurant overlooking the giraffe/ostrich on one side and the rhino/kudu on the other side. But the large open walking area and carousel area could again accomodate at least one or two small animal exhibits.

I like the intensive theming of the new area, except that the giraffe barn is too dominant. But I fear that if this trend continues through future renovations at Houston, they will lose their number one attribute - an extensive collection. The heavy theme park feel of the new area is no coincidence - their current director came here from Disney Animal Kingdom. Will be interesting to see how this zoo progresses.
 
I guess I saw the African Forest backwards then.
Either way I agree. The exhibits are nice but they could have definitely added more exhibits. An aviary could easily have been built considering their huge bird collection. I know they're planning to add one in another phase of this project but even if there were 2 of them that's still a lot better than the current set-up of rows of aviaries.
 
Phase 2 is supposed to be something along the lines of Gorillas, Okapi, Bongo, Leopard, and an aviary. Phase 3 is supposed to be Hippos and Crocs. The only thing certain are the Gorillas though.
 
@Arizona Docent: I enjoyed your neat, brief summary of Houston Zoo. I reviewed the park extensively on my summer 2010 road trip thread, and I agree that it is a worthwhile zoo with a very impressive animal collection. However, no matter how superb the collection is I feel strongly that the zoo lacks a single outstanding exhibit. My favourite section is "World of Primates" with the large netted enclosures, and the many carnivore enclosures are decent, the reptile house would just squeeze into America's top 10, and the children's zoo is also very impressive and a top 10 candidate. Those 4 sections are all very good (and seeing shoebills in a terrific aviary is exciting), and overall I rank the zoo #32 on my list of America's zoos. If the new "African Forest" area expands to include a stellar gorilla habitat then the zoo might rise higher in my personal rankings.
 
Phase 2 is supposed to be something along the lines of Gorillas, Okapi, Bongo, Leopard, and an aviary. Phase 3 is supposed to be Hippos and Crocs. The only thing certain are the Gorillas though.

Since giraffes, rhinos, kudus and cheetahs were NOT originally in "Phase 1,"
(and by the way none of these species actually live in the "African forest"), I would guess Phase 2 is pretty wide open, beyond gorillas. As far as I know, there is no firm plan for Phase 2 yet.
 
I was here back in 06 and really enjoyed my visit.I agree with Arizona Docent that the collection of animals here is very good.While Snowleopard might be right in they don't have a stellar exhibit,they really don't have a bad one either.Its a very solid and well rounded zoo and definitely one of my favorites.

Marty from Team Tapir
 
I continue to be very disappointed that the chimps took the gorilla enclosure. Cost of animals I guess. Does anyone have any timing of Phase II gorillas or are there any projections of troops, numbers, etc. Where exactly will they be--do they get where the chimps are or something new?
 
I continue to be very disappointed that the chimps took the gorilla enclosure. Cost of animals I guess. Does anyone have any timing of Phase II gorillas or are there any projections of troops, numbers, etc. Where exactly will they be--do they get where the chimps are or something new?

Took the gorilla exhibit? What???? These were always two different definite exhibits. African Forest, as far as I know, was going to be done in 3 phases. Gorillas are locked for phase 2, which is currently in fundraising. Phase 3's hippos and crocs seemed pretty well locked as well. Concept art was shown for gorillas, hippo, and croc exhibits on the African Forest edition of the zoo newsletter.

Next year nothing major is expected at the zoo. Some water splash areas in the children's zoo that extends to African Forest is all I have heard that seems for sure. I expect funding to be near complete for Phase 2 a year from now. There is plenty of room to add, 6 acres of currently empty land (the entry path is all temporary). African Forest is now expected to extend out to the Watusi Cattle yard and some if not all of the hoof run.
 
Since giraffes, rhinos, kudus and cheetahs were NOT originally in "Phase 1,"
(and by the way none of these species actually live in the "African forest"), I would guess Phase 2 is pretty wide open, beyond gorillas. As far as I know, there is no firm plan for Phase 2 yet.

Can you post to stories of what Phase 1 was supposed to have? Giraffe, rhino, and chimp is what I have always heard
 
.There is plenty of room to add, 6 acres of currently empty land (the entry path is all temporary).

Ahh, that makes much more sense. When I visited, I was wondering why they had such a long winding entry path with nothing to see.
 
Back
Top