Dallas World Aquarium or Forth Worth Zoo?

Drew

Well-Known Member
Hey everyone, long time lurker......first time poster. My family and I are heading down to Dallas on vacation this weekend and trying to decide whether to go to Dallas World Aquarium or Fort Worth Zoo (mainly to see MOLA). We have a busy schedule which includes the Dallas Zoo among other things and don't have time to fit both in. I have a good friend that swears by the DWA and says i "have to go", but i really like herps! Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
It depends on what you like to see.

I've been twice to Fort Worth Zoo and Dallas World Aquarium. Fort Worth is the much better place to see a good mammal and especially reptile collection, DWA is a very commerical instituion with a lot of not so good exhibits for the animals, but they do have a phantastic collection of birds, mainly south amercian species, and they are keeping many really rare species, most of them from south america. I would say, its a better place to visit it on rainy days, because its an indoor facillity with a tiny outdoor area.

Personaly, I prefer Fort Worth Zoo, because I'm not a fan of to commercial zoos and aquariums.
 
Dallas World Aquarium has a fantastic collection, but the exhibits often leave a lot to be desired. Dallas Zoo is amazing, at least a 6 hour visit, and a candidate for one of America's 10 best zoos. Fort Worth has a terrific animal collection in many average exhibits, although I have not seen MOLA and it is supposedly the #1 reptile house in North America.
 
Have not been to DWA, but have been to Fort Worth Zoo on two separate occasions (pre MOLA). Even without MOLA, I really like Fort Worth. Based on what I have read on ZooChat, I seem to like it more than most people here. Texas Wild is fantastic (even if me and A Nyhuis are the only people who think so ;)), the two sided tiger exhibit (with a lush open waterfall separating malayan from white) is the most original design I have seen, the indian rhino exhibits are better than most, the cheetahs have a boardwalk into the exhibit with open viewing (as opposed to the glass only views at Dallas Zoo), etc.

If you like reptiles, then the addition of MOLA seems to make the choice undisputable - Fort Worth is the way to go.
 
Thanks guys for your help.....I think I agree Fort Worth is the way to go. They are also less expensive....$21 each for DWA! I am definately a lot more interested in the quality of the exhibits and diversity of animals.

As a side note we will most likely be spending Mon. in Austin and I noticed they do not have a zoo. Does anyne know why? I would think a world-class city like austin would have it's own zoo.
 
As a side note we will most likely be spending Mon. in Austin and I noticed they do not have a zoo. Does anyne know why? I would think a world-class city like austin would have it's own zoo.

Austin does, actually, and I'll be seeing this month along with the other major Texas collections (starting a massive USA zoo tour tomorrow :))

It is a small and seemingly odd place called The Capital of Texas Zoo. They have some very rare small carnivores there, but don't expect too much of a show or splendour (for that you need to go to the Dallas-Fort Worth area) as the exhibits and enclosures are supposed to be very basic (but I say there's nothing wrong with that as long as it works for the animals and the visitors - I don't need every zoo to be like DAK)
 
I guess I should have said world-class zoo. I did know about the Capital of Texas Zoo but i thought it was more along the lines of a road-side attraction....i could be wrong though as i have never been to it.

Baldur - Have you started a post about this road trip of yours, sounds like a great time!
 
Baldur - Have you started a post about this road trip of yours, sounds like a great time!

I haven't actually, I'd rather write after the trip when I'll know the zoos from personal experience, although I did manage to steal Snowleopard's fame for 15 minutes or so when I brought up my trip on his tread! :D Got some comments; Anyhuis, Snowleopard and several others have also been kind enough to give me hints and comments. Right now it's less than 24 hours and my stomach is boiling with tension and excitement for this is bound to be the trip of a lifetime. 20-26 zoos in 30 days in 9 US states; like the stunt actors say: "Kids, don't try this at home!" :p
 
If you are in the DFW area why not do both Fort Worth and the DWA on the same day. FW can be done in its entirety in about 3 hours and the DWA in 2 hours. The the zoos in DFW are so different it is hard to choose. Personally, I would do Dallas and DWA as both are very specialized collections and offer animals, sights, and experiences that you can't get at any other zoo. FW on the other hand is overall good, but too generic.
 
I wish i had an extra few hours to see both but i don't think we will be able to fit it in with all the family stuff we are doing. Also I might mention that i am traveling with an almost 3 year-old and a 21 month-old that need naps, etc. We are also on a budget so an extra $42will significantly eat into our entertainment money. If we are lucky enough to gain a couple hours and have some cash to spare i will definately try to make it to both. Thanks for your comments!
 
Personally I would visit the DWA any day.
If you're into reptiles then FW may be the better choice, however in my opinion there is no exhibit at Fort Worth that is really memorable. There are some I really like, but if I could only visit 2 animal collections in the area ever again, they would most definitely be Dallas Zoo, and Dallas World Aquarium.

Actually, Austin has 2 zoos. Austin Zoo and Capital Of Texas Zoo. I have not been to COTZ but Austin Zoo is more of a rescue center with average basic exhibits.
 
The Capital of Texas Zoo is about 20 miles outside of Austin, and it's a private facility with numerous rare species. In fact, most of the fossa in North American zoos were breed there and traded for other rare species.

The Austin Zoo started as a private rescue ranch and grew into a bigger, more public facility. Most of the animals are still rescue animals (and sometimes not in very good shape physically), but they have an incredible collection of big cats and a few rare species.

Both facilities are well maintained and are worth a look, but realize that they both operate on shoestring budgets and are nowhere near AZA level (or WAZA, for that matter).

As for Austin having a world-class zoo, stay tuned...
 
Neither site offers much that will be new to you (in terms of exhibitry) but the Ft Worth Zoo will give you more to think about. Like it or not.
 
My wife is really wanting to go to DWA, and I am really wanting to go to FWZ so in the interest of keeping a harmonious marraige we are saying screw the budget, we'll do all three. Thank you all for your comments !
 
well we are back from our adventure and overall we had a great time! My biggest disappointment was not being able to spend the kind of time i would have liked enjoying the exhibits. Having two toddlers really changes how you experience things! If one was behaving the other wasn't, lol. I'll post a few quick comments about each place....

Dallas Zoo:
The whole Wilds of Africa area is very well done and i really enjoyed it. We got to the zoo right when it opened and went straight to WoA. We walked the Nature Trail at the request of my daughter and first encountered the Gorillas. We spent a lot of time here and my wife and I loved the air-conditioned viewing building as we sat on the couches and let the kids run around and explore the inside. There weren't any great views of an actual gorilla here but it was a great experience anyway. I really liked the series of small exhibits amongst the themed Kopje's including Hyrax, Kilspringer, an aviary, and meerkat among others. The massive yard for the chimps was also impressive. One highlight of my trip was being able to meet Bret (aka "jbnbsn99"), who narrated a very enjoyable and informative journey through africa on the monorail. After Lunch we met up with Bret who kindly guided us through Giants of the Savanna on his lunch break. What can I say about this set of exhibits other than it was the highlight of my trip seeing such a high caliber of exhibitry, animal husbandry and visitor experience all rolled into a stunning savanna landscape....great job Rob! My only real complaint about GotS was the lion exhibit and the fact that the best view of the lions (and where all the lions were hanging out) was within the grill which was so crowded we hardly stepped foot in there and essentially missed one of my favorite animals. The rest of the Zoo was mediocre with good exhibits for tigers, small clawed otters, and herps. I was slightly disappointed with the viewing opportunities of the tigers but the architectural elements within were very nice. If dallas continues to update the older end of the zoo it could be a strong contender for a top 10 zoo.

Dallas World Aquarium:
We arrived first thing in the morning to beat the crowds and we were really glad we did. This gave the kids plenty of time to walk around and really enjoy seeing the multitude of rarely seen mammals, birds, herps, and fish. In fact the DWA is a better zoo than it is an aquarium. Some complaints would be the price (we were only there for 1.5 hours and paid about $45 for two adults), the exhibit size of some of the enclosures, and the lack of focus on actual aquaria. Overall we all enjoyed it very much and being able to get inches away from a sloth being held and fed by a keeper was one of my wife's highlights of the trip.

Fort Worth Zoo:
First, let me say that i think my experience here would have been much better if it wasn't for the crowds. We had to park clear at the back of the overflow lot (a field) and walk for what seemed like 20 min. to the entry. Although I don't think so, I can see how to the regular zoo visitor who is there t pass the time might enjoy FWZ more than Dallas. It had a lot of shade and multitude of average exhibits, including the just-above average Texas Wild! I agree with many of the comments of the forum about the exhibit size and the themed town was slightly too Frontier City for me. I really enjoyed the replicated mine shaft area, Gulf Coast Aviary, and large shaded viewing at the otter, bear and Alligator exhibits. After experiencing MOLA i have mixed feelings about it. On one hand the collection was incredible, i really enjoyed the many large glassed Terrariums, and the finishes within the building were high-end. On the other I was expecting much more for $19 million, the signage was lacking, and the crowds made enjoying the exhibits almost impossible. It seems as though the emphasis was a little too much on the architecture and finishes than it should have been.

Overall we had a great time but i didn't get anywhere near the pictures i wanted. I look forward to going back when the kids are older and are actually interested when i am reading the educational signage to them. Thanks you all again for your recommendations and a special thanks again to Bret for his hospitality.
 
Cool, glad you had a great time!
So now that you've seen them, which did you like better: DWA or Fort Worth?
 
I am leaning toward Fort Worth if for nothing else the value vs. experience I spent 4 hours at FWZ could have spent another 2 but had to get going home so I was somewhat rushed and paid $24 plus a couple drinks; at DWA i spent 1.5 hours (probably could have spent another 1.5 hours there) and paid about $45 plus $5 parking so i got twice the time for almost half the price. Don't get me wrong though i'm glad I went as they have a lot of unique things to see i just don't know if i would pay to go back.
 
Thanks for all of your comments Drew, and you and I seem to agree on a number of things about the Texas establishments that you visited. On my road trip thread I also mentioned how much I adored the air-conditioned gorilla building at the Dallas Zoo, but of course like you there were basically zero gorillas to be seen. I agree that Dallas Zoo is scratching at the surface of America's top 10 zoos but perhaps isn't quite there yet due to the older sections, and that DWA is more of a zoo than an aquarium. Also, having a one-year old makes me appreciate your trials and tribulations of attending zoos with toddlers.:)
 
Snowleapard: It was something very new to me........usually we go to our home zoo and since i know it like the back of my hand we let the kids run around and "choose thier own adventure" you might say. Visiting a new establishment I like to read all the signage and sit for a while to enjoy the exhibits but that is the last thing on my kids minds.....they want to run around like they're used to so that means i have to chase them or they run down the keeper path and halfway into the tortoise exhibit (happened at dallas) when my back was turned for two seconds. Or they want to sit and watch the baby "chimp" (was labeled as a chimp but looked like a bonobo) for an hour when we are on a time crunch and I would like to see the rest of the zoo.
 
If you were at Fort Worth then the Chimp baby was actually a Bonobo. Dallas has a baby chimp though.

Glad you had a great trip, and it was great meeting you.
 
Back
Top