Elephant and Mammoth genomes sequenced, interbreeding rife

Surroundx

Well-Known Member
Some excerpts:

"Scientists had assumed from fossil evidence that an ancient predecessor called the straight-tusked elephant (Paleoloxodon antiquus), which lived in European forests until around 100,000 years ago, was a close relative of Asian elephants.

In fact, this ancient species is most closely related to African forest elephants, a genetic analysis now reveals. Even more surprising, living forest elephants in the Congo Basin are closer kin to the extinct species than they are to today’s African savannah-dwellers. And, together with newly announced genomes from ancient mammoths, the analysis also reveals that many different elephant and mammoth species interbred in the past."

...

"Love Dalén, a palaeogeneticist at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm, says that the study will force a reshuffle of the elephant family tree. “Basically Loxodonta is not valid as a genus name,” he says. He thinks that taxonomists may need to come up with new names for the different species, to better represent the relationship between savannah, forest and straight-tusked elephants."

...

"The researchers found evidence that many of the different elephant and mammoth species had interbred. Straight-tusked elephants mated with both Asian elephants and woolly mammoths. And African savannah and forest elephants, who are known to interbreed today — hybrids of the two species live in some parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo and elsewhere — also seem to have interbred in the distant past. Palkopoulou hopes to work out when these interbreeding episodes happened."

Read more: Elephant history rewritten by ancient genomes : Nature News & Comment
 
that sounds fascinating - pity there isn't an actual paper to read.

I'm not sure what the article means when it quotes someone saying "Basically Loxodonta is not valid as a genus name" - I can only assume they quoted him out of context. Loxodonta has priority over Palaeoloxodon by a hundred years, so perhaps he was saying that the two African elephant species should be put in different genera, but this doesn't seem at all necessary (if anything Palaeoloxodon would be sunk into Loxodonta).

And then there's the bit where the article says "the researchers found evidence that many of the different elephant and mammoth species had interbred" but only gives three examples, one of which is that still known today between the two living African species. I'd like to know more about what the paper really says on that score.


On a semi-related note, there was also this interesting elephant article on the side-line: Linnaeus's Asian elephant was wrong species : Nature News & Comment
 
I found the abstract of the presentation (on Reddit):
Elephantid lineages first appeared in Africa about 9 million years ago giving rise to the African and Asian elephants that survive until today as well as their extinct relatives, some of which disappeared just a few thousand years ago. Morphological and genetic analyses have shown that present-day elephants comprise two genera: the African Loxodonta, which is commonly argued to include two species, the savanna (L. africana) and forest (L. cyclotis) elephant, and the Asian Elephas (Elephas maximus). Extinct woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius) have been genetically shown to be most closely related to the Asian elephant, while other taxa such as the straight-tusked European elephant (Paleoloxodon antiquus) have not been sequenced to date. We generated genome-wide data from 15 Proboscideans, including new high-coverage genomes from 7 elephants (2 forest, 2 savanna, 2 Asian and 1 straight-tusked) as well as low to medium coverage genomes from another 8 proboscideans (4 woolly mammoths, 1 Columbian mammoth, 1 straight-tusked elephant, and 2 mastodons (Mammut americanum, a non-elephant outgroup). We analyzed this dataset to document the evolutionary relationships among the different lineages and reconstruct admixture events, demographic changes and natural selection. Using complete genome sequences, we were able to establish the phylogeny of elephantids and resolve the topology of P. antiquus. We also discovered signals of inter-species gene flow, such as between woolly and Columbian mammoths, and between forest and savanna elephants, revealing a complex history of admixture within the elephantid family.
 
Back
Top