Nandito's zoo visits (January - July 2023)

Salt Merchant

Well-Known Member
January 14, 2023
Ragunan Zoo
Not really a thorough review as I was there only for a short trip. No photos were taken. I didn't have the chance to visit Schmutzer Primate Centre.

Positive:
  • Some exhibits, like the American black bear, capybara, and some herbivore paddocks, are quite good.
  • I really liked the idea of a open-topped, mixed snake exhibit, which Ragunan have with reticulated pythons, gold-ringed cat snakes, Indo-Chinese ratsnake, and red-tailed green ratsnakes. Although when I was there, only the reticulated pythons seems to be present.
  • The reptile sections are decent, need to remove the crocodilians and the turtles.
Negative:
  • The zoo itself is incredibly outdated, with almost all of it's exhibits being very old. Notable examples are the sun bear and leopard complex, primate complex, the various aviaries scattered around the zoo, and the aquarium.
  • The layout of the zoo is a mess, you can't visit this zoo without not missing anything. The map isn't helping either. Very easy to get loss and confused about where to go.
Suggestion:
Definitely need major upgrades and renovations, as well as exhibit restructuring.

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 6/10
  • Animal welfare: 5/10
  • Zoo's setting: 6/10
  • Species variety: 8/10
  • Man-made morphs: Low
Species highlight
  • Reticulated giraffe
  • Pygmy hippopotamus
  • Jaguar
  • Sri Lankan leopard
  • Silvery langur
  • Natuna Islands surili
  • Lesser flamingo
  • Grey heron
  • White-bellied sea eagle
  • Grey-headed fish eagle
  • Silver pheasant
  • Lady Amherst's pheasant
  • Maleo
  • Black hornbill
  • Western crowned pigeon
  • Sclater's crowned pigeon
  • Victoria crowned pigeon
  • Galah
  • Citron-crested cockatoo
  • New Guinea crocodile
  • False gharial
 
July 2, 2023
Jakarta Bird Land

Positive:
  • For a new and small facility, it have quite a suprising number of species, notably the Pinon's imperial pigeon, crowned pigeons, and white-faced cuckoo dove.
  • Excluding the pool area, the aviary it self is quite decent, just need more planting and foliage.

Negative:
  • Unless you have a large and well-planted walkthrough aviary, I don't like the idea of different ecosystem mashup into one, small walkthrough aviary.
  • The aviary have a messy mix of different family and different geography crammed into a small aviary, from parrots, pheasants, starlings, pigeons, ducks, and even storks, cormorants, and hornbill.
  • The park have a massive lake outside the walkthrough aviary with a group of black swans and Chinese gooses, but yet couldn't afford for another Australian pelican to accompany their lone individual.

Suggestion:
The walkthrough aviary should've been limited to housing parrots and cockatoos, which I feel to be more suitable for this facility. It's not like people aren't sold by the idea of parrot aviary, why do you think Indonesians are so appealed by aviaries? They can still add mandarin ducks to fill the pool.

Aside from adding more Australian pelicans and removing the gooses, they should add lands in the middle of the lake for the birds to perch on, making it more appealing. They could add the cormorants from the the main walkthrough aviary, making the lake much more alive that it actually is.

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 5/10
  • Animal welfare: 7/10
  • Park's setting: 4/10
  • Species variety: 8/10
  • Man-made morphs: Handful

Species highlight
  • Asian wooly-necked stork
  • White-breasted waterhen
  • Indo-Pacific common moorhen
  • Golden pheasant
  • Mandarin duck
  • Rhinoceros hornbill
  • Victoria crowned pigeon
  • Western crowned pigeon
  • Pinon's imperial pigeon
  • White-faced cuckoo dove
  • Eastern rosella
  • Brahminy starling
 
July 2, 2023
Faunaland
Another rather brief visit to see if there's any notable changes, which there is plenty. But I decided to leave early (Literally rage quited) after so many stuffs that I personally didn't like

Positive
  • The small mammal exhibits has always been the few best part of Faunaland, nicely designed with interesting species.
  • The white lion exhibit is one of the best in Indonesia, second only to the one in Taman Safari Prigen.
Negative
  • Again, Faunaland is just to small for them to try to be whatever they currently planned to do.
  • No walkthrough aviaries or more aviaries for that matter for the birds to freely fly, another issue that came with the lack of space.
  • Man-made morphs once again are a staple in Faunaland
  • The Patagonian maras were moved into this aviary that seems to be much more suitable for birds, for a much worse reason.
  • The former mara exhibit houses a young, but still large dromedary camel. From what I can see on the internet, it's purpose is for photoshoots.
  • The Arabian oryx and many other mammals being displayed in very small exhibits, only there because the upper echelons feel a bit quirky so they added another exotic animals because why not.

Suggestion:
While it probably won't happen, I hope Faunaland acquire the entire Allianz Ecopark or just moved elsewhere into a larger land.

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 6/10
  • Animal welfare: 7/10
  • Park's setting: 5/10
  • Species variety: 7/10
  • Man-made morphs: Staple

Species highlight
  • Javan leopard
  • Bornean clouded leopard
  • Asian golden cat
  • Sumatran dhole
  • Banded palm civet
  • Spectral tarsier
  • Lesser bird-of-paradise
 
July 2, 2023
Faunaland
Another rather brief visit to see if there's any notable changes, which there is plenty. But I decided to leave early (Literally rage quited) after so many stuffs that I personally didn't like

Positive
  • The small mammal exhibits has always been the few best part of Faunaland, nicely designed with interesting species.
  • The white lion exhibit is one of the best in Indonesia, second only to the one in Taman Safari Prigen.
Negative
  • Again, Faunaland is just to small for them to try to be whatever they currently planned to do.
  • No walkthrough aviaries or more aviaries for that matter for the birds to freely fly, another issue that came with the lack of space.
  • Man-made morphs once again are a staple in Faunaland
  • The Patagonian maras were moved into this aviary that seems to be much more suitable for birds, for a much worse reason.
  • The former mara exhibit houses a young, but still large dromedary camel. From what I can see on the internet, it's purpose is for photoshoots.
  • The Arabian oryx and many other mammals being displayed in very small exhibits, only there because the upper echelons feel a bit quirky so they added another exotic animals because why not.

Suggestion:
While it probably won't happen, I hope Faunaland acquire the entire Allianz Ecopark or just moved elsewhere into a larger land.

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 6/10
  • Animal welfare: 7/10
  • Park's setting: 5/10
  • Species variety: 7/10
  • Man-made morphs: Staple

Species highlight
  • Javan leopard
  • Bornean clouded leopard
  • Asian golden cat
  • Sumatran dhole
  • Banded palm civet
  • Spectral tarsier
  • Lesser bird-of-paradise

The problem with Faunaland is that they're too ambitious yet their ambitions are hampered by the lack of space. Wonder how's their project in Tanjung Lesung doing?

Also, their main breeding/storage facility is in Cibubur AFAIK
 
July 16, 2023
Jakarta Aquarium

Not really a review, I guess? Just want to share some interesting (and negative) updates. I actually didn't want to go to Jakarta Aquarium for a long time since my last visit back in December last year because of the safartri area debacle. But, well, I still live with my family until August and they want to go to this aquarium (They're not a huge fan of SeaWorld Ancol since their reopening).

  • The poison dart frog exhibit (Former vivarium) has been re-landscaped from a very well-designed, well-planted, and moist vivarium into something I honestly don't know how to describe. Let's say that it even have some fake plants. Imagine this terrarium, but a bit larger and cylindrical (https://www.zoochat.com/community/m...t-for-emerald-tree-boa-and-dart-frogs.664647/), compared to what it used to look like (https://www.zoochat.com/community/media/safari-area-poison-dart-frog-exhibit.627556/).
  • In the orchid mantis terrarium, a trilobite beetle (Platerodrilus ruficollis) was added as a companion for the mantis. Genuinely a suprising addition, since of all other much more well known insects, they choose a rather obscure one.
  • For some reason, Jakarta Aquarium has added a formicarium. I don't remember what's the ants species were, but I can remember that there's even a spider within one of the nests. I'm honestly no longer suprised with the amount of dumb shat they do in the safartri area.
  • The giant isopod appears to be on the verge of being almost entirely phased out. They only have one on display, mixed with an Old Wife fish. Very sad to see them pass, but I hoped it doesn't turned into a Old Wife tank as it was very unsuitable due to the tank's shape. I hope to see it returned back into a flatfish tank.

Aside from that, there have been some positive changes:
  • The cobias from the Nursery of the Sea tank has been moved to the main Southern Sea tank.
  • The pair of platax has been moved from the ribbon eel tank to the main coral reef tank. In their place, a group of silver moonyfish has been added into the eel tank.
  • The striped eel catfish tank has been re-modeled into a coral reef tank, with notable inhabitants include an bicolor goatfish.
  • The pair of weedy seadragon are still alive and seems to be quite healthy.
  • In the silver fish tank (Former wobbegong tank), a large number of small long-spine porcupinefish and a trio of lionfish has moved in, with the Indian threadfish returned to the tarpon tank and the torpedo scad to somewhere else.

Suggestion:
I honestly feel like I have quite a grasp on what I want to change in Jakarta Aquarium in term of exhibit design and collection, so I would try to make that someday. It would be too long to make it here.

In conclusion, Jakarta Aquarium, please ditched the Safari area!

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 7/10
  • Animal welfare: 6/10
  • Aquarium's setting: 8/10
  • Species variety: 9/10
  • Man-made morphs: handful
Species highlight
  • Green sea turtle
  • Northern snake-necked turtle
  • Green and black poison dart frog
  • Golfodulcean poison frog
  • Zebra shark
  • Ocellate eagle ray
  • Cobia
  • Giant moray
  • Peppered moray
  • Barred moray
  • White ribbon eel
  • Long-spine porcupinefish
  • Orange-lined triggerfish
  • Pinktail triggerfish
  • Old wife
  • Popeye catalufa
  • Bicolor goatfish
  • Eyelight fish
  • Emperor angelfish
  • Flame angelfish
  • Japanese pineapplefish
  • Longspine snipefish
  • Weedy seadragon
  • Yellowbanded pipefish
  • Goliath tigerfish
  • Payara
  • Jullien's golden carp
  • Siberian sturgeon
  • Giant isopod
  • Mangrove horseshoe crab
  • Indonesian sea nettle
  • Blue bat star
 
July 16, 2023
Jakarta Aquarium

Not really a review, I guess? Just want to share some interesting (and negative) updates. I actually didn't want to go to Jakarta Aquarium for a long time since my last visit back in December last year because of the safartri area debacle. But, well, I still live with my family until August and they want to go to this aquarium (They're not a huge fan of SeaWorld Ancol since their reopening).

  • The poison dart frog exhibit (Former vivarium) has been re-landscaped from a very well-designed, well-planted, and moist vivarium into something I honestly don't know how to describe. Let's say that it even have some fake plants. Imagine this terrarium, but a bit larger and cylindrical (https://www.zoochat.com/community/m...t-for-emerald-tree-boa-and-dart-frogs.664647/), compared to what it used to look like (https://www.zoochat.com/community/media/safari-area-poison-dart-frog-exhibit.627556/).
  • In the orchid mantis terrarium, a trilobite beetle (Platerodrilus ruficollis) was added as a companion for the mantis. Genuinely a suprising addition, since of all other much more well known insects, they choose a rather obscure one.
  • For some reason, Jakarta Aquarium has added a formicarium. I don't remember what's the ants species were, but I can remember that there's even a spider within one of the nests. I'm honestly no longer suprised with the amount of dumb shat they do in the safartri area.
  • The giant isopod appears to be on the verge of being almost entirely phased out. They only have one on display, mixed with an Old Wife fish. Very sad to see them pass, but I hoped it doesn't turned into a Old Wife tank as it was very unsuitable due to the tank's shape. I hope to see it returned back into a flatfish tank.

Aside from that, there have been some positive changes:
  • The cobias from the Nursery of the Sea tank has been moved to the main Southern Sea tank.
  • The pair of platax has been moved from the ribbon eel tank to the main coral reef tank. In their place, a group of silver moonyfish has been added into the eel tank.
  • The striped eel catfish tank has been re-modeled into a coral reef tank, with notable inhabitants include an bicolor goatfish.
  • The pair of weedy seadragon are still alive and seems to be quite healthy.
  • In the silver fish tank (Former wobbegong tank), a large number of small long-spine porcupinefish and a trio of lionfish has moved in, with the Indian threadfish returned to the tarpon tank and the torpedo scad to somewhere else.

Suggestion:
I honestly feel like I have quite a grasp on what I want to change in Jakarta Aquarium in term of exhibit design and collection, so I would try to make that someday. It would be too long to make it here.

In conclusion, Jakarta Aquarium, please ditched the Safari area!

Score:
  • Animal exhibits: 7/10
  • Animal welfare: 6/10
  • Aquarium's setting: 8/10
  • Species variety: 9/10
  • Man-made morphs: handful
Species highlight
  • Green sea turtle
  • Northern snake-necked turtle
  • Green and black poison dart frog
  • Golfodulcean poison frog
  • Zebra shark
  • Ocellate eagle ray
  • Cobia
  • Giant moray
  • Peppered moray
  • Barred moray
  • White ribbon eel
  • Long-spine porcupinefish
  • Orange-lined triggerfish
  • Pinktail triggerfish
  • Old wife
  • Popeye catalufa
  • Bicolor goatfish
  • Eyelight fish
  • Emperor angelfish
  • Flame angelfish
  • Japanese pineapplefish
  • Longspine snipefish
  • Weedy seadragon
  • Yellowbanded pipefish
  • Goliath tigerfish
  • Payara
  • Jullien's golden carp
  • Siberian sturgeon
  • Giant isopod
  • Mangrove horseshoe crab
  • Indonesian sea nettle
  • Blue bat star

It's sad to see the Giant Isopod in the verge of being phased out. Kinda wish it moved to the former wobbegong tank, get a few isopods and probaby a compatible crustacean like Horsehair Crab and some Popeye Catalufas as tankmates. It and the seadragons are like the last of the four deep-sea additions from 2019.
 
The poison dart frog exhibit (Former vivarium) has been re-landscaped from a very well-designed, well-planted, and moist vivarium into something I honestly don't know how to describe. Let's say that it even have some fake plants. Imagine this terrarium, but a bit larger and cylindrical

Don't tell me they still keep multiple dart species within the same enclosure..

A local breeder in the area told me that JAQ apparently frequently loses their darts and buys replacements. Perhaps the new enclosure allows them to keep better tabs on the frogs?

Agreed wholeheartedly that the safari area is severely undermanaged. If the rumor is true, the money used to buy replacement dart frogs could have easily been used to massively improve their reptile and amphibian exhibits, which aside from the axolotl and former dart frog enclosures look like something you'd find in a roadside zoo.
 
Don't tell me they still keep multiple dart species within the same enclosure..

A local breeder in the area told me that JAQ apparently frequently loses their darts and buys replacements. Perhaps the new enclosure allows them to keep better tabs on the frogs?

Agreed wholeheartedly that the safari area is severely undermanaged. If the rumor is true, the money used to buy replacement dart frogs could have easily been used to massively improve their reptile and amphibian exhibits, which aside from the axolotl and former dart frog enclosures look like something you'd find in a roadside zoo.
Back when I visit the aquarium on Sunday, they seems to already loss most of their dart frogs. Only a pair of Golfodulcean poison frog and an green and black dart frog were present, a kid next to me say he saw a blue dart frog but I couldn't see it anywhere.

Why are they trying to cling on the dart frogs so hard even to the point where they regularly spend a lot of cash on more frogs in order to replace another one? I understand that they are the only place in Indonesia that have them on display, but people doesn't really go there to see dart frogs. I found it interesting that Jakarta Aquarium seems to desperately try to maintain their dart frog collection for like 4 years now, even through the pandemic.

The paludariums are also very good if you exclude most of their inhabitants, especially the snake-necked turtles. If you count the safari area as whole, the otter exhibit is arguably the best small-clawed otter exhibit in Indonesia ;⁠-⁠). Again, Jakarta Aquarium seems to done much harder on managing the Safari area collection as opposed to their more extraordinary saltwater collection, which only last for a few years and even months. The aquarium's nautilus, flower hat jelly, and smaller species of cephalopods last for only like a year or two. The giant Pacific octopus and leafy seadragon last until 2021. The wobbegongs last only for several months.

Meanwhile, Senna the serval, Anna and Pavel the ruffed lemurs, the binturong family, and recently the meerkats and capuchin lived rent-free in the aquarium ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
 
Last edited:
The wobbegongs last only for several months.

I should count myself lucky then for seeing them in April 2022.

Why are they trying to cling on the dart frogs so hard even to the point where they regularly spend a lot of cash on more frogs in order to replace another one? I understand that they are the only place in Indonesia that have them on display, but people doesn't really go there to see dart frogs. I found it interesting that Jakarta Aquarium seems to desperately try to maintain their dart frog collection for like 4 years now, even through the pandemic.

I find this all very ironic considering, that the mixing and restocking of different species is what probably led to (or at least contributed to) the loss of the frogs. They're pretty territorial and it's advised not to mix them together, while JAQS thought it would be nice to mix in 4-5 species together including Golfoducean, Green and Black darts, Dyeing darts, Blue darts and if I remember correctly a Strawberry dart.

So they probably could have kept their funny colored frogs on display if they just designed separate enclosures for each of them. It REALLY isn't that hard.

Again, Jakarta Aquarium seems to done much harder on managing the Safari area collection as opposed to their more extraordinary saltwater collection, which only last for a few years and even months.

And here I thought they were keeping their saltwater collection in better shape lol. So it's clear they don't put their effort on the entire safari area, we all know where their priorities lie ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
 
I should count myself lucky then for seeing them in April 2022.



I find this all very ironic considering, that the mixing and restocking of different species is what probably led to (or at least contributed to) the loss of the frogs. They're pretty territorial and it's advised not to mix them together, while JAQS thought it would be nice to mix in 4-5 species together including Golfoducean, Green and Black darts, Dyeing darts, Blue darts and if I remember correctly a Strawberry dart.

So they probably could have kept their funny colored frogs on display if they just designed separate enclosures for each of them. It REALLY isn't that hard.



And here I thought they were keeping their saltwater collection in better shape lol. So it's clear they don't put their effort on the entire safari area, we all know where their priorities lie ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

I saw them at May 2022. Hopefully they'll reintroduce the wobbegongs into the Southern Sea Tank.
 
23 July, 2023
Gembira Loka Zoo

A very short visit as part of my two-days visit to Yogyakarta. I had to travel from Jakarta to Yogyakarta and back with a car, which takes almost 10 hours if there's no heavy traffic. It's almost 11.30 AM by the time I exited the zoo, so I had to start my trip back to Jakarta to atleast before 2 AM to avoid driving through midnight.

My visit to Yogya was also not really for vacation, I almost cancelled my trip to Gembira Loka until I finally managed to find and book a boarding room before 9 AM.

I went to only like a handful of exhibits, there's definitely a number of great one, but most are honestly very outdated. Here's those exhibits and my personal view of those.

Primate Zone:
Not really a full tour as I only went to only several exhibits near the zone's old entrance. The primate exhibits are some old school primate aviaries, even all of the newer one from I can see. There's also three very crammed rectangular aviaries that are more suitable for smaller passerine birds, that infuriatingly have an adult agile gibbon. Another sad sights include Asian palm civet and Malayan civet. Though I'm not a huge fan of primate aviaries, atleast the larger aviaries is still tall enough for the gibbons to move around.

There's also a new walkthrough aviary that barely have any foliage aside from several perching platfroms. Not only that and also the rather small size, it also have the most messy collection choice inside. From green iguanas, African spurred tortoises, Sunda teals, peafowls, mute swans, golden pheasants, and even a bunch of hooded butcherbirds and a trio wreathed hornbills. I guess they were supposed to be temporary inhabitants, as this was planned to house ring-tailed lemurs in the future. I honestly really hope that's the case, the similar aviary at Bali Zoo is bad enough.

Aquarium:
I guess the new capybara enclosure is part of the aquarium zone, right? I definitely not a fan of the design, even if it's for a pair of young capybaras. Eventually they'll get larger and need to be moved elsewhere. The "mega tank" isn't even that "mega". It was very dark, you can barely saw anything until you squint hard enought or when the fish swim closer to the glass. There's also a very huge pirarucu that I barely even notice due to the lighting. The tank also have a upper view for some reason, which was utterly useless atleast for the visitors since you can barely see things and also due to the small size of the "mega" tank.

The main aquarium building is pretty troubling in my opinion. It's a bunch of small tanks with most of their inhabitants having outgrown their tank. Not to mention, it even have a colony of GloFish™ in there! And I thought SeaWorld Ancol was bad.

I really wanted to see the Zoo's white-edged whipray, as it was in my mind the aquarium's center piece. I was disappointed that the ray had apparently been phased out. The tank that supposedly housed the ray now have tinfoil barbs and a pair of fahaka puffer. But only a short while later, I was blasted with a very surprising addition to the aquarium, a Chinese giant salamander!!! Let's say that I'm glad that they for some reason hadn't make any news about this despite the reputation this species has ;-)

Still, I don't like how they displayed the salamander. The tank is quite small for it to move around freely. I prefer the salamander to have it's own "special exhibit" in a sense, rather than treated as another aquatic species in a rather unworthy Aquarium.

Zona Cakar (Scratch Zone):
Another exhibit that I hasn't fully toured, even skipping the zoo's fishing cat and overall the cat row. Still, I managed to visit the zone's and also one of the zoo's center piece, the new Sumatran tiger exhibit. The closest I could compare it to is with Taronga's tiger exhibit. It have two indoor glass viewing where we can see the tigers up close without seriously bothering them. The moat in the outdoor viewing have a beautiful waterfall, coupled with the lush vegetation just across it. There are two otter exhibits (Indoor and outdoor), which I'm not sure if they are connected or not. The outdoor exhibit is pretty decent, the otter's smell though got me nostalgic for some reason. The indoor exhibit wasn't that bad, not a fan of the choice of the plain white wall.

Another interesting addition is the Javan leopard exhibit. Very large and had a lot of climbing platforms for the leopards. Thought, I'm not a fan of the use of wires instead of glass for viewing, making it a bit harder to see the leopards in the rightfully large exhibit. It also had minimal foliage for the shy leopards aside from at the back, which is a huge minus.

Miscellaneous:
There's several enclosures scattered around the park that aren't assigned to the specific zones. At the western part of the entrance, there's a rather ugly, but still large enough aviaries for Prevost's squirrel and cream-colored giant squirrels. They have these wired tunnels that lead to a square space in front of the exhibits for the visitors to see the squirrels feed on some fruits for up close.

Just behind and also beneath it, there are two increadibly old and dirty enclosures with South American coatis and Sunda porcupines. The coati enclosure has like a dozen of them crammed in that enclosure, no idea they had a breeding success with this species. This is what the now coati exhibit when they still had sun bears, the moat is dry now (Thank god they were moved lol) - https://www.zoochat.com/community/media/sun-bear-enclosure.429165/#media

The Sumatran elephant enclosures is pretty much like every other elephant enclosures in all other city zoos, plain but large. Still, atleast they have much more space to moved around and also natural flooring instead of cement. Near that, there's two enclosures with a island in the middle of each exhibits. Despite the relatively small size of the enclosures, the first one have a mother and child Bornean orangutan duo, while the second one have a adult chimpanzee. It was probably one of the oldest inhabitants of the zoo.

Conclusion
I had a mixed view of Gembira Loka. On a positive note, I was genuinely surprised by the zoo's layout. I was expecting a messy and unconnected layout of Ragunan as both were old city zoos, I was amazed that not only the zoo's layout was somewhat modern, the setting and surrounding of the zoo is very great despite being in the middle of a city. Not to mention that the map is actually very helpful and accurate, compared to other Indonesian zoo's.

They also somewhat committed to actually do several upgrades, as Zona Cakar is now on one my Top 10 exhibits in Indonesian zoos and aquarium. Thought aside from that, the other "upgrades" were just not great. There's still so many remnants of the zoo's older exhibits that are now very unfeasible, I'm very pessimistic that they'll do any actual revitalization of those.

There were a lack of staffs in some of the most "vulnerable" exhibit I'd say, especially since impressionable children are frequent in Gembira Loka and Indonesian zoo's overall. The most glaring example in the future lemur walkthrough aviary. Before I entered the aviary, I guess someone's child either forgot their balloon or deliberately gave it to a female wreathed hornbill for "entertainment", the child and their family had left when I first saw the balloon. The hornbill was "playing" around with the balloon until it popped, which definitely shocked most of the aviary's inhabitant especially that hornbill. What followed is a anxious struggle to prevent the same hornbill from literally swallowing and devouring the deflated balloon. It was the closest time that I have ever been to an adult hornbill, I guess I was lucky that the hornbill was quite docile. I found the opportunity to take the deflated balloon as the hornbill was perching in one of circular platform, there was hole in the middle where part of the balloon was peeking in, which I managed to take from the unsespecting hornbill.

Again, despite all that, no guard at all were present inside or atleast around the aviary to prevent this and similar situation. But, I also want to say what the hell was the child's parents doing during that aside from taking selfies and vlogs for their Instagram post? It really prove my point that most of the stupid stuffs and some controversy in Indonesian zoos and also pet keeping in general is the result of bad parenting, as well as lack of proper education and others.

Suggestion
Definitely need to demolish the older, unfeasible enclosures in the zoo and maybe repurpoused it into something else. I can see the coati and porcupine exhibit to be demolished and turned into a large, connected pool. They can moved the pirarucu and other larger fish into the pond.

For the Primate Zone, I'd say follow the Taman Safari model with their Primate Centre. They can build a tall, but also natural enclosures for the leaf-eating monkeys and gibbons with glass viewing. The smaller aviaries can be demolished and turned into a glassed, planted enclosures displaying slow lorises and tarsiers. They can maybe build another primate complex speficically for tamarins and marmosets.

For the orangutan and chimpanzee enclosures, they should renovate it to be much bigger, similar to the enclosures at Taman Safari Bogor's Primate Centre. They also should definitely get more orangutans and chimpanzees as they were somewhat alone in those exhibits, probably due to the lack of enclosure space.

The "mega" tank, after the fishes were moved, should be remodelled with better lighting and natural decoration. Then, the Chinese giant salamander should be moved in to the much better and appropriate enclosure. For the capybara enclosure, as they grow older and larger, it should housed turtles or maybe a dwarf caiman. Aside from that, I'd say it need more foliage.

For the Aquarium it self, moved out all the larger fish in there and definitely get rid of all the GloFish™. Instead, I can see all the +15 tanks being repurpoused into a thematic tanks, representing various rivers and lakes in Indonesia and the world with smaller aquascape fish (Definitely not the man-made morphs one). Since the middle of the Aquarium building was empty, they should get a larger tank where they can display their Asian arowana, tinfoil barbs, bala sharks, clown loach, and, if they could, the white-edged whipray.

The Carnivore Zone (Zona Cakar) is good enough in my eyes aside from several negatives. The wall in the indoor otter enclosure should be repainted/remodelled into a more natural, Rocky wall. Aside from that, they should add glass viewing to the Javan leopard enclosure.

Score
  • Animal exhibits: 6/10
  • Animal welfare: 7/10
  • Zoo's setting: 10/10
  • Species variety: 7/10
  • Man-made morphs: Handful
Species highlight
  • Chimpanzee
  • Agile gibbon
  • Sumatran tiger
  • Javan leopard
  • South American coati
  • Malayan civet
  • Cream-colored giant squirrel
  • Prevost's squirrel
  • Wreathed hornbill
  • Hooded butcherbird
  • Chinese giant salamander
  • Pirarucu
  • Fahaka puffer
 
Last edited:
Back
Top