Pages from Aardwolf's Notebook

I hadn’t planned on making any other entries in this thread, but then two things happened. First, I had my first trip ever to the Pacific Northwest, and travel always gets my exhibit-design ideas going. Second, I read an excellent book of narrative nonfiction (Island of the Blue Foxes, by Stephen Bown, if anyone was interested), which made me decide to take a second look at a barely-formed exhibit concept I mentioned a while back. As I mentioned with my Ituri Quest exhibit idea, I love it when zoos can tell stories with their exhibits, especially combining history, geography, and zoological, and as I mentioned with Forgotten Forest, I really like highlighting geographic areas that are seldom covered. This concept blends both of those ideas.

And so, one more exhibit idea to end the year

Bering’s Crossing

Concept: In 1733, Danish explorer Vitus Bering, in service to the Russian czar, led the Great Northern Expedition of discovery to the Russian Far East and the northern Pacific, the first step in opening Alaska up to Russian colonization. The Expedition fared poorly, with Bering and many of his men shipwrecked and stranded on an island in what would later be known as the Bering Sea. Among the shipwrecked expedition members was German naturalist Georg Steller, who was the first European to describe many of the species of the region. Bering’s Crossing tells the story of Bering, Steller, and the wildlife that they encountered during their quest to survive a harsh landscape.

Species: Giant Pacific Octopus, Wolf Eel, Sea Otter, Steller’s Sea Lion, Steller’s Jay, Steller’s Eider, Steller’s Sea Eagle, Arctic Fox, Double-Crested Cormorant, West Indian Manatee

Spatial Requirements: Two Acres. Exhibits are somewhat spread out to increase the feelings of isolation and bareness of the exhibit

Keeper Requirement: Two Keepers Per Day. Minimum of two keepers present for all diving operations, tank cleanings for safety.

Description: Bering’s Crossing has a one-way visitor flow to facilitate crowd management and narrative elements. Visitors take a crush gravel path down a stony, stark rock garden as they approach the wrecked ruins of the St. Peter, Bering’s ship, which wrecked on the island in 1741. Outside the ship, a pile of barrels, crates, and cargo netting forms a play area for children, with rubber matting underneath to protect them if they fall. This play area is meant to give the children an understanding of life of a sailor, climbing through the rigging and moving through cargo. Some of the crates (fronted with locked Plexiglas doors) hold biological specimens that were collected on the expedition, such as skulls and pelts, as well as replica artifacts from indigenous groups encountered on the voyage, which zoo docents can unlock and bring out for visitors to touch and experience. Visitors enter the St. Peter through a hole in her side, torn open during the wreck, and descend into the sunken hull of the ship.


While the visitor walkway is dry, formed of wooded planks, much of the rest of the ship appears to be flooded as a result of the wreck. Visitors peer into the hold of the ship, now underwater, which now appears to be inhabited by sea creatures which have taken over the ship. In other spots, visitors can peer through holes in the ship, looking out into the underwater world outside, actually aquariums for giant Pacific octopus and wolf eel, along with anemones and sea stars. Stationed around the exhibit are the signs, made to resemble open notebooks made by Steller as he records his findings about the plants and animals of the region, and full of sketches and observations. The path ramp backs upward out of the ship. Visitors then take the gangway (lined with rope-netting side barriers) onto “Bering Island.”

The gangway passes between pools of two marine mammal exhibits – sea otters on the left, Steller’s sea lions on the right (life support systems for these exhibits are underneath the wreck of the St. Peter). The visitor path slopes to the right, along the front of the sea lion exhibit, which gradually takes visitors below the surface again for underwater viewing of the sea lions, before emerging back to the ground level. Visitors find themselves in a clearing, with a small stadium of benches (seemingly hewn from logs and driftwood) facing the sea lion exhibit for training demonstrations, before passing back towards a series of small huts in the middle of the clearing. On the path of the huts is a small garden; signage explains how Steller was able to use these plants to treat himself and his compatriots from the scurvy which plagued them.

Each of these huts (ostensibly replicas of the huts in which the sailors overwintered) faces outwards from the clearing to a different exhibit; visitors enter through the door, and then look out a window of each of a different habitat. The first hut looks out to the smallest habitat, a 20’ x 20’ x 10’ tall aviary for Steller’s jays (it was this species and its resemblance to the blue jays from his books which first confirmed to Steller that the expedition was in the New World, and not Russia any longer). The exhibit consists of a few small pine trees surrounding a large flat rock, while a small creek meanders through the pine-needle covered floor of the exhibit. The second exhibit is 50’ x 30’, open roofed, and houses Arctic foxes. The foxes are in a lightly wooded meadow with a few small trees and small hills, but appear to be in the act of ransacking the camp, sneaking between boxes and through overturned camp furniture. Their enrichment is often given in bags and boxes, heightening the impression that they are scavenging from the men (in truth Steller and his compatriots considered the foxes to be the banes of their existence on the island due not only to their thievery of food supplies, but due to their attacks on weakened/dying men). The third hut seems to be set on the edge of a rise, overlooking a small valley. This provides an elevated vantage point for the nearly quarter-acre aviary for Steller’s sea eagles, which are often seen perching in tall pine trees overlooking a central pool, which is occasionally stocked with live fish. The aviary has a few large trees, stationed mostly around the edges with one large dead tree in the center. This create more open space for flight. The outside of the aviary is more densely planted to help obscure the mesh.

Leaving the clearing, visitors follow the path through a set of double-doors into an outdoor walkthrough aviary, a marsh that is inhabited by Steller’s eiders and double-crested cormorants. The cormorants serve as a stand-in for the now-extinct spectacled cormorant, described by Steller on the voyage and since driven to extinction. The back of the aviary passes through some boulders, leading into a darkened exhibit building.

Inside the building, naturalism is eschewed briefly. The floor is tiled, the interior darkened, the walls on either side largely dominated by underwater viewing windows. The windows on the left provide underwater viewing of the sea otters seen earlier. Display cases and signage describe how Bering’s expedition was very nearly the beginning of the end for these charismatic mammals, as the expedition led to the introduction of sea otter pelts to European markets and an explosion in demand for the species’ fur. Hunting nearly drove the species to extinction. The opposite wall tells the even sadder story of the Steller’s sea cow, represented here by the manatee. This tank is approximately 200,000 gallons (about twice the size of the manatee tank in Cincinnati, for comparative purposes). The manatees seen here are non-releasable specimens from Florida. Their exhibit is completely insulated from the public area, so that the extra warmth needed for these cold-intolerant animals doesn’t clash with the sub-Arctic theming of the exhibit. Set into the tile flooring of the viewing area is a life-sized outline of a sea cow, with an outline of a manatee of top of that, to give visitors a better understanding of just how large these animals were. A broken whaling boat lies wrecked at the bottom of the manatee tank, further demonstrating the hunting that drove these giants to extinction.

To end the exhibit on a lighter note, a display at the exit of the building tells the story of Steller’s sea ape, a cryptid described on the expedition but never confirmed by science. Visitors are invited to ponder its origin and meaning, or if it was merely a figment of Steller’s imagination. The aquarium building exists out onto the zoo main path.
This was an amazing zoo design thread, it was simply done perfectly! :)
 
I love how the concept feels like both a zoo exhibit but also like a history museum exhibit -- tying together the Age of Exploration with both the tragedy of subsequent extinction and the triumphs of early natural science is such a smart way to elevate multiple concepts at once. The drama of the human story can hold visitors with less interest in wildlife. Fantastic work as always.
 
Your creative ideas and detailed design are phenomenal, really impress me. But just few question
Milky Eagle Owl, Caracal, Aardvark, Springhaas, Cape Porcupine, Rock Hyrax, Straw-Colored Fruit Bat, Moholi Bushbaby, African Rock Python, Emperor Scorpion, Spotted Hyena
Springhares are very rare in captivity probably the only AZA holder is Omaha, could that be realistic for North American zoos to have Springhare?
I was surprised at how many species came from New Guinea
In fact, European zoos have even more New Guinea collections like Dusty Pademelon, Brown Dorcopsis King Bird-of-Paradise, Twelve-wired Bird-of-Paradise and much more population of Ground Cuscus (San Diego and Bush Garden are the only 2 holder under AZA, but Europe has 13 holders) Looks like AZA zoos are not interested with these species. Anyway, you can add Agile Wallaby to the New Guinea exhibit.
Species: Giant Pacific Octopus, Wolf Eel, Sea Otter, Steller’s Sea Lion, Steller’s Jay, Steller’s Eider, Steller’s Sea Eagle, Arctic Fox, Double-Crested Cormorant, West Indian Manatee
How does West Indian Manatee associate with Bering's theme, he didn't reach the Southern US though.
 
Last edited:
Your creative ideas and detailed design are phenomenal, really impress me. But just few question

Springhares are very rare in captivity probably the only AZA holder is Omaha, could that be realistic for North American zoos to have Springhare?

In fact, European zoos have even more New Guinea collections like Dusty Pademelon, Brown Dorcopsis King Bird-of-Paradise, Twelve-wired Bird-of-Paradise and much more population of Ground Cuscus (San Diego and Bush Garden are the only 2 holder under AZA, but Europe has 13 holders) Looks like AZA zoos are not interested with these species. Anyway, you can add Agile Wallaby to the New Guinea exhibit.

How does West Indian Manatee associate with Bering's theme, he didn't reach the Southern US though.
In answer to your questions

1.) I mentioned in my first post, I’ve written these over a period of many years, and Secrets was one of the first I designed. At the time, springhaas were considerably more common in American zoos than they are now. Even so, if a zoo were inclined to import the species into the US to establish a population, I would consider it fairly feasible. No CITES or ESA permits, the main obstacle would be the CDC permits required for any African rodent, captive or wild bred - and that wouldn’t be too onerous of a burden, to be frank

2.) If this were built in other regions the species roster could be different. I was most interested in species that were very uniquely New Guinean, leaving out some species that are from the island but didn’t strike me as evocative

3.) As was mentioned, the manatee serves as a stand in for the now extinct sea cow. It’s my own little San Diego/Elephant Odyssey touch

Thanks for all of the comments, everyone - I’m glad folks enjoyed the thread
 
Two small carnivore taxonomy-themed exhibits

Foxes on the Edge

Concept: Though they are immediately familiar to many people, foxes are not especially popular as zoo animals. When they are exhibited, it is usually in a smaller side habitat that does little to highlight their uniqueness and adaptability. Foxes on the Edge places these small canines front and center, highlighting three species of the genus Vulpes which have managed to thrive in three very different yet challenging habitats across the globe by being flexible and adaptable. The overarching message of this exhibit is that different habitats pose different challenges for the animals that live there, and that in order to survive and thrive in harsh environments, animals must be well-suited to their environment.

Species: Arctic Fox, Fennec Fox, Red Fox

Spatial Requirements:

Keeper Requirement: A single keeper is sufficient to take care of this exhibit, while still being able to take on additional habitats.

Description: Foxes on the Edge does not feature one specific habitat type, so its physical campus is more generic than many exhibits, which are trying to invoke a specific place or feel. The broad cement sidewalk, lined with shrubberies, leads to a pair of indoor habitats, going into an alleyway between the two. Besides the sidewalk, a large, colorful world map shows the distribution – natural and introduced – of all the fox species, underneath the banner “Foxes of the World, a World of Foxes!”

The front of each building is dominated by a massive graphic of a fox – an arctic fox on the right hand side, a fennec fox on the left. Each graphic is surrounded by highlights of the features, both behavioral and physical, that make each animal well-suited to its habitat, while also pointing out similar, unrelated animals that have similar traits. For example, the fennec fox graphic will call attention to how the massive ears help dissipate heat (similar to elephants), how the cream-colored coat helps reflect sunlight (similar to sand cats), and how the foxes stay cool by staying in their burrows during the day (similar to many rodents). A highlight that appeals to many visitors is a large bronze of a pair of fennec fox ears, which visitors may place their heads between for a photo-op.

The twin buildings each provide indoor housing for one of the respective fox species, measuring 40 feet long by 20 feet deep. The arctic fox exhibit is air-conditioned to provide comfortable summer housing. It consists of several slate slabs forming a rocky backdrop to a foreground of soil buried under a thick blanket of pine needles. Several small live pine trees, as well as two large hollow logs, are also provided, as is a shallow (6 inch) pool. The rock formation in the back provides may climbing opportunities, as well as several small nooks and caves for the foxes to shelter in.

The fennec fox exhibit, directly opposite, is a sandy landscape with several prickly pear plants and a palm tree or two, as well as a red rock formation of its own. Mostly, however, it is an open, desolate habitat. The glass-paneled roof helps hold in sunlight, keeping the exhibit very warm (to highlight the different preferences of the two foxes, each species has a thermometer at the front of the habitat to allow visitors to compare the temperatures).

At the end of the alley is a third fox habitat, this one resembling a small townhouse at the edge of a city. The house itself provides the backdrop (as well as keeper space and indoor holding, including holding space for other arctic/fennec foxes if separations are needed), while the yard – a 30 by 30 foot grassy plot with a few planter beds, a bird bath (which provides water), some small trees, and a small patio table provides the main habitat for a pair of red foxes. The foxes also have constant use of the patio, where a porch swing and railings provide further climbing structures. Here, signage explains how red foxes around the world have adapted to urban life, complete with photos depicting foxes in cities around the world, from the US to France to Japan. The lesson presented here is that, while the arctic and fennec foxes are specialists adapted to specific habitats, the red fox is a canny survivor which can make its home in diverse landscapes – sometimes even crowding out its specialist cousins.

After the red foxes, the path bifurcates and curves backwards, around the backs of the two fox buildings. At the back of each building is an outdoor habitat for the foxes; the arctic foxes have outdoor access in the winter, the fennecs in the summer, though at some times in the year both may have full indoor and outdoor access. The paths then merge again at the front of the exhibit.

Cat’s Cradle

Concept: Virtually everyone is familiar with the big cats, such as the lion and the tiger, but how many zoo visitors are familiar with the many equally fascinating but far-less studied small cats that are found across the globe? The smaller felids have often been overlooked in zoos, written off as poor exhibit animals of limited interest to the public, likely to hide all day. As a result, breeding programs for many of these species have suffered from a lack of space and institutional interest. Cat’s Cradle seeks to remedy this by creating an innovative, exciting, flexible habitat for five species of small felid.

Species: Sand Cat, Black-Footed Cat, Ocelot, Fishing Cat, Pallas’s Cat

Spatial Requirement: Approximately ¼ Acre

Keeper Requirements: 1 Keeper der day

Description: Unlike many other zoo exhibits, Cat’s Cradle makes no pretense of immersing the zoo visitor in the habitat of the animal. This is because the species featured here don’t have “a habitat” – they come from varied habitats around the globe. While the habitats themselves are made reasonably natural, the public spaces are glossy, modern, and high-tech, evocative of a science museum. The message that the visitor absorbs as they walk through the door is that this is a scientific facility devoted to the study and conservation of endangered small felids.

The building itself is relatively unconventional looking. Cats are everywhere. Right in front of the entrance is a replica skeleton of a Smilodon, posed standing on top of a rocky outcrop in a silent roar. A pair of pillars, shaped like the Egyptian cat goddess Bastet, flanks the entrance, while a series of metallic sculptures depicting cats leap in an arc over the doorway. Immediately inside, visitors walk down a corridor heavily decorated on one side with depictions of cats – big and small, exotic and domestic – in our literature, culture, and religion. The other side is a mural of the living felid species in a tableau, with a key one the side identifying each one.

Inside, the building is circular, with visitors traveling around a central island that holds educational displays. These displays – some graphics, some mounted TV screens playing looped clips, some scale models, some taxidermy mounts of mounted skeletons, and some props. These displays pose and answer a variety of questions, such as: “Where in the world do cats live?” “What makes a cat a cat?” “What makes cats such successful hunters?” and “Why are cats in danger?” A special exhibit gallery takes a look at the most common of the word’s cats – the domestic cat - exploring how this species came to be domesticated, how humans have changed cats from their wild ancestor, and how domestic cats can act as invasive species and imperil native wildlife (this exhibit is unapologetic in its advocacy of keeping cats indoors and includes resources for how to build an enclosed “Catio.”

The outer walls of the building are made up of habitats for the five species of wild felids exhibited here. The first two exhibits are paired dryland enclosures for two representatives from Africa, the sand cat and the black-footed cat. Exhibits are situated three feet off the ground to allow easier viewing. Each of these glass-fronted exhibits is about 25 feet long and 10 feet deep and 10 feet tall, making them unusually spacious for small cat exhibits. Each is floored with a mixture of sand, soil, and gravel and contains live plants (including small trees), extensive rockwork, and deadfall for climbing. The rockwork at the back is pockmarked with caves and burrows, providing ample hiding spaces for the animals. Half of each ceiling is made up of skylights, allowing in natural light, while the other half has lights that can be manipulated by staff to alternate between day, twilight, and night (the later achieved through blue lighting). Overhead misters can provide a fine, misty drizzle as an occasional light rain.

The Pallas’s cat exhibit is roughly the same size as the desert cat enclosures, though slightly taller (15 feet) to accommodate more rockwork. This exhibit is a towering rock heap with a few small scraggly pines growing from planters.

The longer back wall of the building is taken up by two jungle habitats, one for fishing cats and once for ocelot. Each is about 40 feet long and 15 feet deep and 10 feet high. These exhibits are each densely planted. Each has a pool – a mere six inches deep in one, two feet deep in the other – which can be stocked with live fish for enrichment.

The design of the building facilitates the shifting of the sand cats and black-footed cats between each other’s exhibits for increased exploration opportunities and enrichment. The same set up exhibits between the fishing cat and ocelot exhibits.

Outside the building, a small trail meanders in an arc around the building, encompassing five habitats for the small cats. Each is roughly the size of the indoor exhibit and made in roughly the same mold, though with more live plants. Again, the option to rotate between exhibits exists, meaning that each sand cat, black-footed cat, ocelot, and fishing cat really has four habitats that it can be shifted between, two indoor and two outdoor, while the Pallas’s cats have two (being much more cold hardy that the other species, the Pallas’s cats get more winter access).

The exhibit fall of the building is the show space; much of the breeding takes place behind the scenes. The basement level of the building contains holding space for additional small cats, including stalls for private housing and rearing of kittens, as well as larger rooms for introductions. This area also includes a small amount of quarantine space, a small kitchen, a small workshop for making enrichment, and a keeper office. The building is equipped with a small number of closed circuit cameras which can be placed in various dens and exhibits and monitored remotely from the keeper office.
Just saying but I love this exhibit and the main reason is Because I am a big fan of the Pallas cats but if I was designing an exhibit like this I would add In two creatures and they are both cats and one of them which is the Scottish wildcat can only be found in zoos in Europe while the other one which is the Eurasian Lynx can be found in zoos in North America and Europe and the exhibits for the cats would be themed around Scotland and the exhibits would be themed around Scotland because Scotland is the only place in the wild where you can find the Scottish wildcat but the Lynx exhibit would be themed around Scotland because before 700ad the Lynx used to roam across all of Britain minus Ireland however from 700ad up until the 18th century the Lynx’s last bastion in Britain was Scotland however there has been an increasing interest in returning once native carnivores to the Uk as part of growing Rewilding schemes and while the reintroduction of wolves into the Uk is highly unlikely any time soon but the return of the Lynx is seen by some as much more achievable.
 
if a zoo were inclined to import the species into the US to establish a population, I would consider it fairly feasible. No CITES or ESA permits
What are the feasible origins of importing Springhare, private breeder, rescue center or wild-caught from Africa?
 
@StellarChaser ,those are all possibilities. Wild import would probably be the most likely if a party were interested - which at present time no one in the RIL TAG is, as far as I know. It’s doable, and wouldn’t even be too expensive, all things considered. I just don’t think there’s the interest, which I can’t blame folks for. Springhaas were never exactly a major draw (I mean, I like them. I’ve seen them at I think three zoos, and the wild). But if several zoos decided that they were interested and were willing to go in on importing a few pairs, they could really take off. The system of making literally everything an SSP a decade or so ago was meant to flatten out that boom/bust population cycle that we were seeing in with so many species (Patagonian cavy, I’m looking at you…)

@Tigeanderson , my early designs for the cat exhibit actually called for an additional outdoor walking trail with caracal, serval, fishing cat, and Canada lynx, but I decided to focus more on just the smaller species. Wild cat just wasn’t present in the numbers for me to justify its inclusion, cool though the species certainly is from both a conservation and historical perspective.
 
Exhibits of black-footed ferret, burrowing owls, and other species are side-by-side in a seeming panorama of habitats, each with an underground cutaway area and with an above ground area. Special attention is paid to the ferret, detailing its extreme dependence on the prairie dog and its near extinction and reintroduction.
This is my currently my favorite exhibit that you have envisioned and shared, out of several great ones. I decided to read it again, and pondered for a little while how this idea would work for black-footed ferrets. I don't recall ever seeing a black-footed ferret enclosure, but I can't imagine they could be managed in an enclosure similar to what most zoos have for prairie dogs. I'm thinking this because they are generally solitary and subject to federal regulations.

The manatees seen here are non-releasable specimens from Florida.
How many manatees were you thinking would live in this exhibit? I understand these concepts are all hypothetical, but this specific idea is impractical (with my current understanding of the amount of non-releasable manatees there are).
 
BFF could be managed in an exhibit similar to how prairie dogs are typically kept, but it would be difficult, wildly impractical, and almost impossible for keepers to regularly have eyes on them, let alone visitors. Instead, the ferret exhibit that I imagined would have been similar to, say, SNZP's black-footed ferret exhibit in the Small Mammal House (which, when it opened, had an identical prairie dog exhibit attached to it to create a panorama, but the prairie dogs are no longer in it). I took that idea and decided that, instead of prairie dogs, I'd extend that panorama with the owls and other small animals.

Three or so manatees was my idea for the Bering Strait exhibit. And no, I wouldn't be any less practical than Columbus or Cincinnati having the species outside of the range. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if in the future we see more manatees that are in need of permanent placement in zoos and aquariums, in addition to the revolving-door of rescue and releases, as the wild population struggles.
 
BFF could be managed in an exhibit similar to how prairie dogs are typically kept, but it would be difficult, wildly impractical, and almost impossible for keepers to regularly have eyes on them, let alone visitors. Instead, the ferret exhibit that I imagined would have been similar to, say, SNZP's black-footed ferret exhibit in the Small Mammal House (which, when it opened, had an identical prairie dog exhibit attached to it to create a panorama, but the prairie dogs are no longer in it). I took that idea and decided that, instead of prairie dogs, I'd extend that panorama with the owls and other small animals.
That is pretty much what I thought about black-footed ferrets living in a prairie dog-style exhibit. It took me a moment to figure out what "SNZP" is. I didn't realize that the enclosures for auxiliary small animals weren't adjacent to the prairie dog enclosure, which I think would also have been cool. It looks like there is a layer of dirt or sand on top of some hard mold of a tunnel and den system in the pictures of those enclosures. Is that necessary, or could they just be given a foot or so of substrate to dig in? Do you think there would be any way to exhibit black-footed ferrets in an outdoor enclosure in a panorama with bison and pronghorn, or would that just not be possible?

Three or so manatees was my idea for the Bering Strait exhibit. And no, I wouldn't be any less practical than Columbus or Cincinnati having the species outside of the range. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if in the future we see more manatees that are in need of permanent placement in zoos and aquariums, in addition to the revolving-door of rescue and releases, as the wild population struggles.
What I meant about practicality was that I didn't know if there were enough (three) non-releasable manatees right now to do design a facility specifically for. There are?

Chinese Hwamei
Any reason for Chinese hwamei specifically, and only Chinese hwamei?
 
I think you could house black-footed ferret outside, but exhibiting them would be extremely difficult. They're everything that prairie dogs are not - nocturnal, solitary, carnivorous (in this case relevant because they eat one meal daily, rather than being out and about foraging all day) - so just wouldn't work well as display animals in such a context. Compare it to meerkats or dwarf or banded mongoose - also carnivorous, but they eat several smaller food items a day compared to one big meal, which means they spend more time above the surface, plus they are social and diurnal

Right now, this minute, are there three rescue animals available? Who knows (outside of FWC/USFWS). Will there be three available tomorrow, or next week? Same answer, but possible. Sourcing rescue animals for exhibits is often a feast-or-famine situation (I don't speak from experience with manatees, but with other several other native species). Sometimes there are none to be had. Sometimes there's a bonanza of them, and you start getting panicky emails from wildlife officials trying to place them before the non-releasable ones get euthanized. One thing manatees have going for them in this situation is their longevity; once you have a rescue manatee, or two or three, deemed non-releasable, you don't need to find another in a hurry any time soon. That being said, this was the exhibit in my notebook in which I did give myself the most free rein to imagine what could be. Honestly I'd find the sea lions to be a bigger headache to source than manatees, I suspect.

Why Chinese hwamei? Why not? Whenever possible, I try to use AZA-managed program species, I considered which managed passerines were native to China, and thought this one would be a good fit. I could have also gone with, say, red-billed leiothrix, for example. Why only Chinese hwamei, and not more species? I decided just to go for a single passerine species, as my focus was on reptiles for that exhibit. When making these exhibit plans, I tried asking what they'd probably look like in real life, rather than a list of all the species that could work there. I don't think I've ever been part of an exhibit design process in real life where we didn't end up scaling down the number of species/features involved in the exhibit
 
For today's exhibit, we take a page from Bill Conway and apply his "How to Exhibit a Bullfrog" to a species that is one of the most ubiquitous mammals in American zoo collections, but seldom truly highlighted as a star attraction itself:

Prairie Dog Pass

Concept: Prairie dogs are an almost ubiquitous in zoo collections and are very popular exhibit animals. Their true ecological importance is seldom appreciated. At the same time, most zoo exhibits provide little insight into the true complexity and uniqueness of prairie dog life. In many parts of their natural range, prairie dogs are viewed as pests or as competitors for livestock. It is the desire of this exhibit to provide a comprehensive, in-depth look at the ecology of one of North America’s most social keystone species, the black-tailed prairie dog.

Species: Collared Peccary, Black-Tailed Prairie Dog, Black-Footed Ferret, Grasshopper Mouse, Burrowing Owl, Prairie Rattlesnake, Houston Toad

Spatial Requirements: 0.5 Acres. About two-thirds of the space is taken up by the outdoor peccary exhibit, the remainder by the prairie dog building.


I was going to ask if any zoo has done a prairie dog town exhibit and came across this thread.
Its been reported that anywhere from between 126- to "hundreds" of animal species utilize prairie dog towns. I think this this is worthy of a much larger exhibit. I'd like to see a 5 -10 ish acre exhibit that includes bison and pronghorn. With an attachment building to show many of the hundreds of species to be found in and around prairie dog towns. Kind of a prairie dog town museum(let) to showcase the importance of the dogs .
However one that I would not include would be the Houston toad which does not overlap with the prairie dog.
 
Back
Top