Pygmy Sloth Exporting

Pacarana

Well-Known Member
Attempt to export nearly-extinct pygmy sloths sets off international incident in Panama

Definitely a good read. A little long though. I'm not too surprised that this is something Dallas World Aquarium would do, but to have the bad publicity on their hands is going to be hard to get rid of. I'm also surprised that no other institution that was involved, was addressed like Dallas was.

I'm a strong believer in captive breeding but I don't feel like this is the right way to do it. Especially since this animal, though not protected on the island, is protected by the people. Having the community fight for this animal is already an accomplishment.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
This is a good example of how a good intentioned wildlife conservation project can backfire by completely ignoring the local population. I know of other examples from my work as an enviromental anthropologist in Mexico. Let us hope that the DWA will learn from the lamentable mistake.
 
Thank you for sharing ! Realy unbelieveble that a well-known zoo tries to obtain such an endangered animal-species this way ! I would say : try first to be succesfull with a related species and only if this proved to be working ( what isn't the case ) you can bring in some of the Pygmy sloths in cooperation with other zoos, conservation societies and other experts !
As I understand from the article the Pygmy sloths are relative save on their small home-island for the moment so there is time do do further recearch and to gain experience with the releated species !
 
Thank you for sharing ! Realy unbelieveble that a well-known zoo tries to obtain such an endangered animal-species this way ! I would say : try first to be succesfull with a related species and only if this proved to be working ( what isn't the case ) you can bring in some of the Pygmy sloths in cooperation with other zoos, conservation societies and other experts !
As I understand from the article the Pygmy sloths are relative save on their small home-island for the moment so there is time do do further recearch and to gain experience with the releated species !

That's exactly what the DWA has done. They are the only facility that has ever been successful with the larger Brown-Throated 3-toed species.
 
As I understand from the article the Pygmy sloths are relative safe on their small home-island for the moment so there is time do do further recearch and to gain experience with the releated species !
I'm not convinced the sloths are very safe on their island: - a group of scientists from the Zoological Society of London went to conduct an extensive population survey of the pygmy sloths in March 2012. In total they encountered only 72 sloths and observed a lot of mangroves that had been cut down. (The sloth appears to be found exclusively in red mangrove forests surrounding the island)
 
That's exactly what the DWA has done. They are the only facility that has ever been successful with the larger Brown-Throated 3-toed species.

But even in the article it states that DWA's success with this species is very limited. Many of the sloths died, and DWA was only left with a fragment of the amount they had to begin with.
 
A couple of the comments sound like some of you think DWA did something shady or unethical, but the article says:

Sigler presented to the airport officials a research permit, animal export permit and a veterinary certification – all the required paperwork for the export.

Whether the survival of the species is best served by remaining on the island or being bred in captivity is a separate issue, but I saw nothing that leads me to think DWA did anything wrong legally or ethically.
 
That's exactly what the DWA has done. They are the only facility that has ever been successful with the larger Brown-Throated 3-toed species.

"Successful" is a relative term. They have kept an individual or two alive for an extended period, which is great, but long term, multi-generational propogation is not even close to have been acheived.
 
"Successful" is a relative term. They have kept an individual or two alive for an extended period, which is great, but long term, multi-generational propogation is not even close to have been acheived.

I'm not convinced the sloths are very safe on their island: - a group of scientists from the Zoological Society of London went to conduct an extensive population survey of the pygmy sloths in March 2012. In total they encountered only 72 sloths and observed a lot of mangroves that had been cut down. (The sloth appears to be found exclusively in red mangrove forests surrounding the island)

This is the quandary. The animal is rare,and is probably getting rarer. At what stage does one decide that a captive programme - and these usually end up with animals dying. whilst the husbandry is being established - should be risked?

I'm not knocking reduakari, but if species like Western Gorilla, Snow Leopard, Giant Panda, and Okapi are looked at, we see that early importations were pretty disastrous; lots of early deaths and no breeding for ages. Trial and error were part of the learning process.
 
like most Zoochatters I'm a big upholder of captive breeding for conservation purposes, but this is just stupid. I agree with the various professional people interviewed in the article that this should never have happened. There is literally nothing known about breeding, keeping, or even feeding pigmy sloths in captivity, and the experience Dallas has with keeping and breeding three-toed sloths I would call "poor" at best. Hell, it isn't even known what pigmy sloths eat in the wild (I had thought mangrove leaves myself, but the article says that isn't known for sure). Dallas may have had all the necessary permits but they went about it entirely the wrong way, and they just plain shouldn't even be attempting it. If they want to do something for the sloths, focus on protecting the wild population and the island's forests. Given the interest the locals obviously have this should be entirely feasible.

I do agree with IanRRobinson that the situation with the wild population is a pickle (leave them to it, take some for captive-breeding attempts). One could point to such successes as Californian condors (fully removed from the wild) or black robins (left in the wild but fully managed), but comparing to okapi, gorillas, etc is irrelevant as they are relatively simple to keep alive and breed (now) whereas three-toed sloths are not. (Which is to say, the species he mentions were fumbled with when zoological husbandry was not very developed).
 
I would opt for a locally sponsored two pronged approach habitat conservation and ethological/ecological research and tied in with a captive-breeding attempt (at some later stage).

A simple collecting trip sort of brings back how the last giant tortoises were dispatched and will not do if in situ conservation is not served ...
 
I'm not convinced the sloths are very safe on their island: - a group of scientists from the Zoological Society of London went to conduct an extensive population survey of the pygmy sloths in March 2012. In total they encountered only 72 sloths and observed a lot of mangroves that had been cut down. (The sloth appears to be found exclusively in red mangrove forests surrounding the island)
a recently-published study suggests that the pigmy sloth is not quite as rare as previously thought. Link to the actual paper (abstract only unless one is a member): Biology and conservation of the pygmy sloth, Bradypus pygmaeus | Journal of Mammalogy

Press release from the Smithsonian:
More Endangered Pygmy Sloths in Panama Than Previously Estimated | Newsdesk
25 June 2015

A Smithsonian scientist found that pygmy sloths wander inland in addition to inhabiting the mangrove fringes of their island refuge. He realized that the population size of the pygmy sloth was underestimated; a new, higher estimate for the number of sloths on Panama’s Escudo de Veraguas Island points to how little is known about the species, and it underscores the need to conserve the sloths’ isolated home.

Found only on a tiny island in the southern Caribbean, the threatened population of the pygmy three-toed sloth (Bradypus pygmaeus) does not have much room to grow. Fortunately, the world’s smallest sloth species is less fussy about habitat than initially thought. Once believed to live only in the mangroves that edge Panama’s Escudo de Veraguas Island, a new paper in the Journal of Mammalogy shows that the sloths also inhabit the island’s forested interior. This suggests that an estimate of fewer than 500 individuals based on the most recent census of pygmy sloths—79 individuals counted in the mangroves—may have fallen considerably short.

Bryson Voirin, a former fellow at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, placed radio collars on 10 sloths in mangroves and tracked their unhurried movements at three- to six-month intervals over a period of three years. Only three sloths remained entirely within the mangroves. Five moved past the mangrove edge into other tree species, and four moved more than 200 meters inland—quite far for a sloth. Coupled with population density estimates and extrapolated across the island’s 430 hectares, Voirin reached a high-end estimate of almost 3,200 individuals.

“The actual population size is most likely somewhere between these two—perhaps 500 to 1,500 individuals,” said Voirin, a researcher at Germany’s Max Planck Institute of Ornithology. “In any case, this is extremely small number for an entire species.”

Voirin warned against too much optimism for the pygmy sloth’s critically endangered status. Escudo de Veraguas is only nominally protected and developers have the island in their crosshairs—one proposal calls for turning the place into a semi-autonomous tax haven boasting a marina, airstrip, casino and hotel.

“Declaring the island a wildlife refuge or national park would protect not only the pygmy sloths, but also the other unique species found on the island,” said Voirin. Escudo de Veraguas is also home to an endemic hummingbird species and an endemic bat species. Its beaches are important for nesting sea turtles, and its flora remains understudied. Currently, the island falls under jurisdiction of the indigenous territory of Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca, and it is also threatened by unregulated timber harvesting.

The pygmy sloth was first described in 2001 by researchers at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History as separate from its mainland sister species, B. variegatus. It is about 40 percent lighter in body mass and 15 percent shorter in overall body length. Rising seas isolated Escudo de Veraguas about 9,000 years ago, and the sloth appears to have followed the process of insular dwarfism, by decreasing in size over time. Voirin and colleagues also found that because there are no sloth predators on the island the pygmy sloth exhibits different sleep-and-wake patterns from its mainland relative.

Future pygmy sloth research will involve deeper analysis of the species’ genetics and the diverse microbial community that lives on its fur. Voirin also hopes to better understand the sloth’s diet and population trends.

“Further scientific research on the pygmy three-toed sloth is much needed, and we hope we will continue to yield new insights into its life history,” he said. “Such research will not only help us to better understand the species, but will enable us to ensure that it persists into the future.”


There is a short Youtube video on that second link as well about Voirin's work which is definitely worth watching (and in which he admits to being "out-run and out-smarted by sloths all the time").
 
Attempt to export nearly-extinct pygmy sloths sets off international incident in Panama

Definitely a good read. A little long though. I'm not too surprised that this is something Dallas World Aquarium would do, but to have the bad publicity on their hands is going to be hard to get rid of. I'm also surprised that no other institution that was involved, was addressed like Dallas was.

I'm a strong believer in captive breeding but I don't feel like this is the right way to do it. Especially since this animal, though not protected on the island, is protected by the people. Having the community fight for this animal is already an accomplishment.

Thoughts?
My entire opinion on this swerved when I read that he had permission from the Panamanian government. (Most every article about this makes it sound like he just went out, stole, and broke the law). Yes it's risky, but all it takes is a large ecological disaster to wipe them out, so the survival of the species is going to be at high risk anyways.

Also knowing the success the aquarium has had with brown throated three toed sloths, I think he could have been successful with it, but perhaps an unlikely success.

I think it is important to have captive breeding before it is too late for many species, such as the devil's hole pupfish, who is in a similar situation (and has captive breeding). Captive breeding could have potentially saved the baiji and unfortunately (possibly) soon the vaquita, but it's taken too long for programs to get moving and well, too little too late.

This is what I fear will happen to pygmy sloths.
 
Also knowing the success the aquarium has had with brown throated three toed sloths, I think he could have been successful with it, but perhaps an unlikely success.
what success has the aquarium had with three-toed sloths? How many have they imported, and how many of those have died. Simply keeping a few sloths alive is not the same as being successful in establishing a captive population, which is what would have been needed for the pigmy sloths.
 
what success has the aquarium had with three-toed sloths? How many have they imported, and how many of those have died. Simply keeping a few sloths alive is not the same as being successful in establishing a captive population, which is what would have been needed for the pigmy sloths.

From what I know, they've only had two. The one that is there currently has set the longevity record for three-toed sloths in captivity, which I imagine was not very high before that (not to downplay it, it's still a notable accomplishment).
 
what success has the aquarium had with three-toed sloths? How many have they imported, and how many of those have died. Simply keeping a few sloths alive is not the same as being successful in establishing a captive population, which is what would have been needed for the pigmy sloths.
Very true, which is why I mean unlikely. I heard they have bred at least one sloth, which is a jump considering the species has failed miserably in other zoos in America (Hence why Dallas is the only place to have found a way to keep them alive).

This is a pattern at the aquarium. The owner takes in a random animal that has failed horribly in zoos or been ignored from being taken into zoos (Ex: Orinoco crocodile, Andean Cock of the Rock, etc...), gets failure (at controversial expense), tries again, eventually finds out how to get breeding success with the species. Because of this we can now see orinoco crocodiles and cock of the rocks in multiple zoos, with many many more animals to add to that list, and perhaps soon flashlight fish since they are working hard to successfully breed them.

After this incident it is now nearly impossible to export pygmy sloths, so all we can do is speculate the pros and cons, but Daryl Richardson clearly felt successful and prepared enough to take care of these to take such a gamble with such a rare species (after four years of working with the Panamanian government to set up a breeding colony).

Am I saying this is a good situation for the pygmy sloths to be put in? No. The trial and error would be very dangerous for such a rare species, but should he succeed the species would be much more secure.

He had no intention of exhibiting them, and was planning DNA tests of the species, furthering our understanding of the species. Breeding likely would have failed, but in his mind the possibility for success and amount of that success outweighed the risks.
 
Back
Top