One of the main tasks of my nearest collection, the New Forest Otter, Owl and Wildlife Park, is the rehabliation and release of wild animals brought into them by the public, vets and RSPCA that have been found orphaned and/or injured. If the latter cannot happen for whatever reason, the animal(s) will become a resident at the Park, serving as an ambassador for the species: A good example is the Park's two young red fox siblings, Bramble and Moss. A large amount of these rescued animals are injured or orphaned otter cubs, and these are kept in rows of off-show pens till they can go back into the wild.
However, I was looking at the site of another similar native-species collection in the UK, Wildwood, and found they do not take in injured wildlife as they feel it would be a health hazard to their own resident animals.
What is your opinion on this? Do you think it's a good act if a zoo or wildlife centre can maintain a wildlife rescue programme, or is it too much of a risk introducing potential diseases from outside into a collection?
However, I was looking at the site of another similar native-species collection in the UK, Wildwood, and found they do not take in injured wildlife as they feel it would be a health hazard to their own resident animals.
What is your opinion on this? Do you think it's a good act if a zoo or wildlife centre can maintain a wildlife rescue programme, or is it too much of a risk introducing potential diseases from outside into a collection?