i visited melbourne this morning and overheard the zoo guides telling visitors how rigo was the most genetically valuable gorilla in the world. they also metioned how he was very large for a silverback and particuarly handsome, as if that had something to do with his value! whilst i'm not sure about him being the most valuable, he certainly is underrepresented genetically, and after thinking about it more and more i'm starting to think that it is totally unacceptable, in this day and age, to keep a social animal like a gorilla, wether he be genetically valuable or not, alone for 10 years without any real company. i also think that removing moataba and his still young sons from the troop is an equally unfair.
now i can only see two justfiable scenarios as to why melbourne would keep rigo alone for a decade in a sub-standard enclosure.
1) the zoo believes he has such bad social problems he cannot be kept with any other gorillas, or
2) despite years of trying the zoo has never managed to secure a place for him at another zoo.
the sign on rigo enclosure states that they hope one day he will lead a troop of his own at another zoo.
now i don't work within the zoo industry, but i find it hard to believe that if rigo was so genetically valuable, that not a single decent zoo in the world has shown any interest in acquiring him in the last 10 years.
i also don't believe that the zoo belives rigo is an unsociable gorilla - otherwise they wouldn't be suggesting placeing him within their troop in the near future. nor has from my knowledge, rigo ever been attempted at being integrated with any more than two female gorillas (betsy and yuska) in his life.
melbourne zoo has an obligation to update their exhibit and place him with some new female company, or give him to a zoo that can. examining the ape grottoes this morning i can tell you now that it would require very little to refurbish them into something that was acceptable. european studbook or not, it seems rediculous that he is living alone when their are two totally unrelated females living just 800km away in adelaide.
10 years living alone is long enough!!!
now i can only see two justfiable scenarios as to why melbourne would keep rigo alone for a decade in a sub-standard enclosure.
1) the zoo believes he has such bad social problems he cannot be kept with any other gorillas, or
2) despite years of trying the zoo has never managed to secure a place for him at another zoo.
the sign on rigo enclosure states that they hope one day he will lead a troop of his own at another zoo.
now i don't work within the zoo industry, but i find it hard to believe that if rigo was so genetically valuable, that not a single decent zoo in the world has shown any interest in acquiring him in the last 10 years.
i also don't believe that the zoo belives rigo is an unsociable gorilla - otherwise they wouldn't be suggesting placeing him within their troop in the near future. nor has from my knowledge, rigo ever been attempted at being integrated with any more than two female gorillas (betsy and yuska) in his life.
melbourne zoo has an obligation to update their exhibit and place him with some new female company, or give him to a zoo that can. examining the ape grottoes this morning i can tell you now that it would require very little to refurbish them into something that was acceptable. european studbook or not, it seems rediculous that he is living alone when their are two totally unrelated females living just 800km away in adelaide.
10 years living alone is long enough!!!