It's been a long road - and I have an idea or two for "postscripts" to the mammal photographic guide project - but we have finally reached the final two major mammalian groups yet to be covered; the Xenarthra (sloths, armadillos and anteaters) and the Pholidota (pangolins), groups which although now recognised to belong to unrelated branches of the placental radiation were long assigned together within the now-defunct "Edentata" due to superficial similarities in dentition and - in the case of armadillos and pangolins - armoured integument.
We have, of course, already dealt with the aardvark in an earlier thread devoted to the Afrotheria, and as such need speak no further on the matter. However, before we get into the photographic guide proper, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the current placement of the two remaining groups in our understanding of the wider placental phylogeny.
To deal with the simpler issue first, it seems fairly well-established at this point that the Pholidota - despite being quite dissimilar to the members of the Carnivora in appearance, morphology and habits - represents the closest living kin to the aforementioned group, these representing the only living members of a clade termed the "Ferae" which appears to be sister to the Perissodactyla and Cetartiodactyla, It is worth mentioning, incidentally, that several extinct groups of mammals including the hyaenodont and oxyaenid "creodonts", are also regarded as members of the Ferae, and moreover that despite the similarity of the creodonts to modern carnivores they appear to be closer phylogenetically to the pangolins.
The trickier issue is where precisely the Xenarthra fits in; it is clear that they are one of the basalmost groups of modern placental mammal, but the precise order in which groups diverged is still a matter of great debate and currently three taxonomic models have been proposed:
We have, of course, already dealt with the aardvark in an earlier thread devoted to the Afrotheria, and as such need speak no further on the matter. However, before we get into the photographic guide proper, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the current placement of the two remaining groups in our understanding of the wider placental phylogeny.
To deal with the simpler issue first, it seems fairly well-established at this point that the Pholidota - despite being quite dissimilar to the members of the Carnivora in appearance, morphology and habits - represents the closest living kin to the aforementioned group, these representing the only living members of a clade termed the "Ferae" which appears to be sister to the Perissodactyla and Cetartiodactyla, It is worth mentioning, incidentally, that several extinct groups of mammals including the hyaenodont and oxyaenid "creodonts", are also regarded as members of the Ferae, and moreover that despite the similarity of the creodonts to modern carnivores they appear to be closer phylogenetically to the pangolins.
The trickier issue is where precisely the Xenarthra fits in; it is clear that they are one of the basalmost groups of modern placental mammal, but the precise order in which groups diverged is still a matter of great debate and currently three taxonomic models have been proposed:
- The "Exafroplacentalia" model, whereupon the Afrotheria are the basalmost extant group of placental mammals, with all other groups belonging within a clade of this name. Within the Exafroplacentalia, the Xenarthra would be basal to the remaining clades.
- The "Epitheria" model, whereupon the Xenarthra are the basalmost extant group of placental mammals, with all other groups belonging within a clade of this name.
- The "Atlantogenata" model, whereupon the Xenarthra and Afrotheria form a clade of this name, basal to all other groups.