Two-Day Zoos

snowleopard

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
Spurred by the discussion on the Pairi Daiza 2019 thread, I have been pondering what zoos of the world cannot be fully toured in a single day. Of the 420 different zoos and aquariums that I've visited, I would estimate that perhaps 3 of them would need more than a day to properly see. I'm basing my thoughts on an average visit from a zoo enthusiast, although we must all bear in mind that for some people a typical zoo visit is only a few hours...while for others they like to camp out for an interminable amount of time watching specific animals.

In North America:

San Diego Zoo - This zoo is definitely a two-day facility, especially with its winding canyon pathways and long treks up and down steep roads. One day is clearly not enough.

Bronx Zoo - A zoo that really does require two days, partly due to its immense size of 265 acres but also because of the enormity of the animal collection.

Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium - I was at this zoo from open to close last summer and I comfortably saw everything. However, it was my 3rd visit in a decade and it didn't include any back-tracking into the large animal buildings near the entrance. A first-time visitor would need two days and the zoo heavily advertises that fact at the admission booths with a discounted, two-day ticket.

Of all the other major U.S. zoos, there is never an issue of missing anything in a single-day visit. I know of individuals who have spent a full day at Columbus, Cincinnati, Saint Louis, Denver, etc., and those days might have been lengthy but there was never any chance of missing anything and there was even time for backtracking in an attempt to spot 'no-shows'. A zoo that could easily become a two-day facility in a few years would be North Carolina Zoo, as there are plans for an expansion into Australian and Asian continental areas that would join the existing African and North American zones. North Carolina Zoo is already a full day of adventures (500 acres!) and there is a desire to turn the zoo into a two-day destination within the next 5 years.

There isn't a zoo in Africa that would require more than a day to visit, and South America is in the same position. Australia has Taronga Zoo and Melbourne Zoo but neither are two-day ventures even though I do recall a very long day at Taronga Zoo when I was there in 2007. Asia has Singapore Zoo but I think that everyone I know visits both the zoo and the Night Safari on the same day and so the main zoo obviously doesn't necessarily require two days.

That brings me to Europe.

Berlin Zoo - I've been told by numerous zoo nerds that two days is essential and that the aquarium alone can take 2-3 hours.

Berlin Zoo Tierpark - At 400 acres it is a massive zoo with many spacious ungulate paddocks. Clearly a two-day zoo or at the very least a zoo enthusiast would need 1.5 days for each of the Berlin giants and therefore 3 days for both would be a minimum. I've known several people that have seen everything over 3 days between the zoos but I'm guessing that 4 days would be ideal.

Pairi Daiza - This Belgian zoo has grown in leaps and bounds over the past decade to the point where it is apparently difficult to see everything within the confines of a single day. However, the late summer hours means that the zoo is open for 11 hours per day and even 13 hours on Fridays and Saturdays. I suppose that this zoo is a one-day zoo in July and August (but a very long day!) or clearly a two-day zoo at any other time of the year.

What other zoos of the world would possibly require more than a day to properly see everything. Prague? Chester? What others???
 
Good question!

Obviously it’s a personal thing, but I’d certainly add Beauval to the list (especially if the bird show is watched - as it must be); Prague (could gladly go beyond two days there); and Wroclaw (especially if reptiles are of more than a passing interest). Pilsen clearly is a two-dayer if behind-the-scenes tours are included.
 
Berlin Zoo - I've been told by numerous zoo nerds that two days is essential and that the aquarium alone can take 2-3 hours.

Berlin Zoo Tierpark - At 400 acres it is a massive zoo with many spacious ungulate paddocks. Clearly a two-day zoo or at the very least a zoo enthusiast would need 1.5 days for each of the Berlin giants and therefore 3 days for both would be a minimum. I've known several people that have seen everything over 3 days between the zoos but I'm guessing that 4 days would be ideal.

Zoo Berlin can just about be managed in a day if you are well-disciplined, I reckon; on my first visit in 2014 I managed everything but the Hippo and Rhinoceros houses within a day, and hence had a second day where I visited these and revisited a few other highlight areas, but I think I would have got around everything had I not revisited the Bird House and Pheasantry so many times, and hadn't been writing copious, copious notes :P on my second visit in Sept 2018 I managed everything within a day pretty comfortably, but of course repeat visits are different, and the Carnivore House and Nocturnal Basement was closed.

Tierpark Berlin definitely requires two days to view properly; on my first visit in 2014 I managed to get around 2/3 of the place in a day, but this was in the company of German zoonerds who already knew their way around the place, and a second full day to polish off the final third and revisit areas was needed. My second visit in Sept 2018 only just about fit into a single day - given the aforementioned advantage repeat visits give in terms of speed and timekeeping, and the fact the Alfred-Brehm Haus was closed and hence a chunk of time was saved, this perhaps shows just how big the place really is.

This said, when @ThylacineAlive and @ShonenJake13 visited these two collections for the first time in September 2018 - days before my aforementioned repeat visits - they told me that they had managed to finish Tierpark in a day, and Zoo (barring the Aquarium) in under a day :P they still spent an extra day at each, however, as I had the pleasure of their company during my repeat visits.
 
Once WRS open the Bird Park and Rainforest Park on the reservoir site in Singapore (2021 maybe?) there will be five collections all adjacent to each other run by the same organisation. I am going to be annoyingly insistent on this site that this will represent one 'zoo' which may literally be a three day visit, even for someone like me who (with a small amount of jogging) can get around the Berlins in a day each. I think one day it will be the best zoo in the world, if they make some careful improvements to the existing collections after they finish the new builds.
 
even for someone like me who (with a small amount of jogging) can get around the Berlins in a day each.

That's a fair bit of jogging for Tierpark :p on the aforementioned Sept 2018 trip where I managed Tierpark in a day, my pedometer stated that by the end of the day I had walked 39.31 kilometres.
 
Out of the zoos on this list, I have visited Bronx, San Diego, and Pairi Daiza. I have easily seen the majority of all of these zoos in one day, but I'd agree that if I were to visit them again, I'll spend two days at each zoo, not one.
 
There isn't a zoo in Africa that would require more than a day to visit.
I'm not so sure. The National Zoo of South Africa in Pretoria is an absolutely massive zoo with a very comprehensive collection, complete with an extensive aquarium and reptile park. I think one would be very hard-pressed to comfortably see the whole facility in one day. While I lived there, I always split my visits across two days.
 
I recall the Minnesota Zoo being difficult to get through in one day, but I haven't been there in a long time.
 
I recall the Minnesota Zoo being difficult to get through in one day, but I haven't been there in a long time.
Minnesota Zoo is easy to do in one day, provided you get there right when the zoo opens.

I nominate Brookfield Zoo. Now, this zoo only takes two days if you truly wish to do everything. That is, visit both Hamill spots and see the dolphin and bird shows - which honestly isn't a bad way to go at Brookfield. You can get away with doing all those things and seeing everything if you go on a day they are open late, but it can still be difficult to squeeze everything in.
 
This said, when @ThylacineAlive and @ShonenJake13 visited these two collections for the first time in September 2018 - days before my aforementioned repeat visits - they told me that they had managed to finish Tierpark in a day, and Zoo (barring the Aquarium) in under a day :p they still spent an extra day at each, however, as I had the pleasure of their company during my repeat visits.

I think this genuinely surprised the both of us! Tierpark we managed in one day but we had no time for revisits and both the carnivore house and pachyderm house were closed (the former for obvious reasons and latter due to a rhino calf birth). Had they been open we would not have finished in one day. Zoo I maintain can be done in a single day. We didn't do the aquarium but that was only because we purposefully saved it for our second visit and we did not stay until closing as we saw everything we needed/wanted to. Of course the carnivore/nocturnal house was closed so perhaps this would have pushed our visit into a two-day necessity. I have no idea how long it takes to visit the building.

What other zoos of the world would possibly require more than a day to properly see everything. Prague? Chester? What others???

@ShonenJake13 and I had tentatively planned for two days at Prague, but we did it relatively comfortably in a day and ended up using our second day to visit Jihlava instead. I believe the zoo will be opening a new Australian exhibit and a parrot house by the end of the year, however, with further developments waiting to begin. I would recommend allowing for two days here but also having a back-up plan should you succeed in a day.

Chester is a zoo that I'd definitely recommend two days for. I have visited twice now- in 2016 and 2018- and on my first visit we barely covered the entire zoo (and I was being shown around by several members very familiar with the collection); on my second visit we ended up skipping a couple of the minor exhibits, though we did go at a much more leisurely pace and chose to revisit Monsoon Forest. With phase 1 of their Madagascar exhibit well underway, a new Asiatic Lion-centric exhibit just getting started, an African grasslands exhibit on the slate, an African forest exhibit being planned, and Islands still being developed, if this zoo isn't already a two-day visit it certainly will be very soon.

Obviously it’s a personal thing, but I’d certainly add Beauval to the list (especially if the bird show is watched - as it must be); Prague (could gladly go beyond two days there); and Wroclaw (especially if reptiles are of more than a passing interest). Pilsen clearly is a two-dayer if behind-the-scenes tours are included.

As you said, it's obviously personal due to how fast someone walks, what they want to see, how extensively they focus on each exhibit/animal, how lucky they get with spotting targets, etc. but for myself and Jake we had were able to just about see Wroclaw (including reptiles) in a day, and we were a bit rushed due to having gotten a late start and having to leave a tad early. Though seeing as the zoo is pretty rapidly expanding, I don't think allowing for two days is a bad idea.

Plzen we had no problems completing in a day, bts included. Admittedly we were only given about 30-40 minutes bts, but I still don't think a longer tour would have pushed things. Maybe it was different before they started moving most of the off-show collection on-show?

~Thylo
 
Plzen we had no problems completing in a day, bts included. Admittedly we were only given about 30-40 minutes bts, but I still don't think a longer tour would have pushed things. Maybe it was different before they started moving most of the off-show collection on-show?

Helly and myself definitely needed both days - granted this was during the time of a larger off-show collection, where we spent about 150 minutes behind the scenes, but I reckon the factor which influenced our speed most of all was actually the temperature :p we visited during something of a heatwave, and the heat and humidity was so intense that it definitely slowed our progress around the collection on our first day. I think we spent almost an hour in the subterranean house cooling off!
 
Toronto and Bronx are the only two zoos I've visited where I can truly say would take me more than a day to see everything. The size of the parks combined with the number of exhibits make it almost impossible to see everything in one go, I spent a full day at each and still missed a couple sections.

I feel like St. Louis has the potential to be a 2 day zoo for me but I haven't been in close to 15 years, so I'm not sure to be honest. I know with all the changes since I last visited I'd want to spend a lot of time there.

As for everything else...yeah every other zoo I've visited is a one day or even half day facility haha. I didn't see all of the Denver Zoo in one trip but that was due to being in a group of people who wanted to leave early in order to beat traffic, not because I couldn't get through it all.
 
Super interesting topic! I'm really enjoying reading all the opinions so far.

I guess a place to start defining this category a bit more is to look at both the people visiting the zoo, and the "type" of zoo itself.
A zoo visit is a different experience for everyone, as we all know. For example, I'm relatively sure most members of the non-zoo-hobbyist public that would stumble upon this topic would be of the opinion that all zoos can be done in a single day: it's no big deal if you miss an area, and photography is not often the main focus of a zoo visit. Even with us zoochatters, I imagine there will be a lot of people who don't need to stop at every enclosure: I love making lists of just about any bird, mammal or reptile I see, but through most aquaria or insect houses I'll casually walk by most tanks until something catches my eye. If you make lists of all of those (and enjoy seeing the animals while doing so), you're going to be in that aquarium a lot longer than most people, of course. I'm sure photographers are even more pressed for time, having to go back to certain places for the perfect picture at the perfect time of day. People that are familiar with the zoo will go through zoos a lot quicker than people who aren't, etc.
I think it would be possible to split the "two-day zoo" category roughly in two; zoos that focus on smaller animals but have very large amounts of them forming one group (i.e. Plzen, Berlin Zoologischer Garten, Wroclaw) because it takes a lot of time to see every species, and zoos that focus on larger animals but have huge surface areas (Toronto, Berlin Tierpark, Pairi Daiza) forming the other group, as the walking between exhibits just takes a lot longer. I think a correlation between my earlier thoughts about the different people can be tied into this as well; people that enjoy listing and photographing every single species will spend a lot of time in zoos of the first group, whereas people that aren't that bothered about smaller animals might be more interested in spending more time at enclosures for larger animals, and might spend a lot of time in zoos of the second group.

For me personally, I find time in zoos seems to be a very weird and unpredictable thing! I usually get through Antwerp completely in just under 2 hours, but on some days I'll be there for just about a full day and still not see everything (and Antwerp is tiny compared to many zoos on this list)! On the other hand, many of the zoos people here mention needing two days (Bronx, Pairi Daiza, Beauval, Prague, Toronto) I have been able to do comfortably in one day. Berlin Zoo and Wroclaw were both fairly tricky and @KevinVar and I ended up not quite seeing the entire zoo because of a slight lack of time, but I reckon are definitely more than doable in a day when done more efficiently. The only zoos so far where I've needed (and planned!) second days were Berlin Tierpark and Plzen - but I don't think I'd need multiple days if I were to visit them again, as the necessity of seeing the majority of species has been met on the earlier visits... Having said all this, I'm sure I could spend 2 (or more!) days at all of the zoos mentioned in this thread so far, and not be bored for a second!

A zoo that I haven't seen in this thread so far, to my surprise, is Walsrode! I've done it fairly comfortably on single days twice now, but I've heard of a few people taking two or more days for it - which I definitely understand!
 
Good question!

Obviously it’s a personal thing, but I’d certainly add Beauval to the list (especially if the bird show is watched - as it must be); Prague (could gladly go beyond two days there); and Wroclaw (especially if reptiles are of more than a passing interest). Pilsen clearly is a two-dayer if behind-the-scenes tours are included.

Prague surtainly belongs IMO on this list: it huge and has a large number of different houses - places were I can spend a lot of time. I vitited Prague 2015, needed 2 days and later discovered that I had still missed one of the houses completly ( one of the Reptile-houses :( ) !
 
I agree with Chester being on the list - that said, I was visiting with family who were a little slow moving.

My next visit will certainly be a two day trip.

Berlin zoo - I've only had one unfortunate visit whist on a school trip to Germany - We were only allocated TWO HOURS at this huge collection.... I was not best pleased.

I shall be taking a trip there again in the near future (I hope) and two days will most certainly used.
 
Good question!

Obviously it’s a personal thing...

And that’s it, I fear. There is not going to be any decisive answers to this question because the way people visit zoos is an independent variable. Some will find it hard to get through Walsrode in two days, for instance, whereas I was content with just less than a full day. Neither is the wrong way to do it.

The ones I’ve been to where I’ve found it tough to get around everything in one day are San Diego, Bronx, Beauval, Prague, Chester and the two Berlins. So all major global leaders, but in at least one case (Bronx) it’s only because the opening hours are unreasonably short. Prague would have been fine had it not been 35 degrees, which was taxing. At Beauval I was limited by my need to get a bus back to Paris at about 4:30 or so. San Diego can, I think, be done in a big day during summer when the hours are longer.

I managed at Chester, just, and at the Tierpark, just. Berlin Zoo would have been a real struggle had I not done the Aquarium separately, though I think I’d have managed simply by lavishing less time on the bird houses.

Personally, I don’t think a zoo *should* take more than one day to finish. I think any zoo goer, even slow ones like us, should be able to make a day of a zoo and feel confident of seeing the whole thing. That’s just a question of basic fairness to the consumer.
 
And that’s it, I fear. There is not going to be any decisive answers to this question because the way people visit zoos is an independent variable. Some will find it hard to get through Walsrode in two days, for instance, whereas I was content with just less than a full day. Neither is the wrong way to do it.

The ones I’ve been to where I’ve found it tough to get around everything in one day are San Diego, Bronx, Beauval, Prague, Chester and the two Berlins. So all major global leaders, but in at least one case (Bronx) it’s only because the opening hours are unreasonably short. Prague would have been fine had it not been 35 degrees, which was taxing. At Beauval I was limited by my need to get a bus back to Paris at about 4:30 or so. San Diego can, I think, be done in a big day during summer when the hours are longer.

I managed at Chester, just, and at the Tierpark, just. Berlin Zoo would have been a real struggle had I not done the Aquarium separately, though I think I’d have managed simply by lavishing less time on the bird houses.

Personally, I don’t think a zoo *should* take more than one day to finish. I think any zoo goer, even slow ones like us, should be able to make a day of a zoo and feel confident of seeing the whole thing. That’s just a question of basic fairness to the consumer.

Agree with your final statement...
 
However, the late summer hours means that the zoo is open for 11 hours per day and even 13 hours on Fridays and Saturdays. I suppose that this zoo is a one-day zoo in July and August (but a very long day!) or clearly a two-day zoo at any other time of the year.

I did spend like ten hours in Pairi Daiza and it was quite doable in a day, and I had time to see (almost) everything comfortably and make return visits to some enclosures (like the tasmanian devils). I skipped the bird demonstration though.

Personally, I think Zoo Berlin is doable in a single day if you are there from opening till closing. That being said, I had no time of return visits and I would have loved to visit the bird house a second time. For Tierpark Berlin I think two days are needed (at least on the first visit). It gave me time enough to see everything comfortably including a few return visits for rare species. In retrospect, the knowledge that I had a second day probably did slow down the pace in the Tierpark, and I think the same could be true for the Zoo. I choose however to squeeze Magdeburg in instead of a second visit to the Zoo, and I don't regret it.

Walsrode is difficult. I think a lot of people can easily see it in a day, but as a bird fanatic I simply can't. I went two days and though I had seen everything to my satisfaction, I could've easily spend another day there. I do think that Walsrode is the sort of place where a slower pace truly makes for a more pleasant visit, as you are able to enjoy the fantastic atmosphere better. But if birds aren't your thing, I guess even with a slower pace it is possible to see the zoo in a day.

For me personally, I find time in zoos seems to be a very weird and unpredictable thing! I usually get through Antwerp completely in just under 2 hours, but on some days I'll be there for just about a full day and still not see everything (and Antwerp is tiny compared to many zoos on this list)!

Good point. For me, Burgers' Zoo is like that. I could easily hang around in the dome complex (Bush, Ocean, Desert) for an entire day and not be bored a second. However, if I don't feel like spending a lot of time in a single place, I can easily see the entire zoo in a few hours.
 
I feel like St. Louis has the potential to be a 2 day zoo for me but I haven't been in close to 15 years, so I'm not sure to be honest. I know with all the changes since I last visited I'd want to spend a lot of time there.
I took two days at Saint Louis, but only because I got there a couple hours after opening on the first day. If I had gotten there right when the zoo opened, Saint Louis would have been an easy one day-er.
 
Wow...lots of great responses to this thread! Clearly a zoo visit boils down to personal taste, as has been pointed out on a few occasions already. I know a zoo enthusiast who claims that they saw everything at San Diego Zoo in 6 hours...while most zoo nerds take two days to make their rounds at that world-famous attraction. A very young zoo friend of mine is not a big fan of reptiles and amphibians, and so (hypothetically speaking) if he were to venture far afield to Wroclaw Zoo then I suppose he'd be done and dusted in not much more than half the day...while I enjoy Reptile Houses and the one at Wroclaw is apparently jam-packed with delights.

Opening hours is a major factor in my opinion. The Bronx Zoo is open from 10:00 - 5:00 year-round and 7 hours is NOT enough time to see everything; the hours there are most unfortunate for zoo enthusiasts. On the other hand, Pairi Daiza has brilliant hours in July and August, being open for 11 hours per day and even 13 hours on Fridays and Saturdays. Surely enough time to see it all, right? Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium is open for 8 hours in the summer and the buildings are actually open for 9 hours during the peak season. It took me a full 8 hours to see everything last summer and I didn't double-back into any of the buildings. However, in the winter Omaha is only open for 6 hours (buildings for 7 hours) and that is NOT enough time to see one of the world's great zoos. The zoo promotes a second day via posters and signs near the admission booths, and even this morning I visited the zoo's website and after selecting a ticket a statement reads: "Upgrade to Two Day Admission - Add a second day at the Zoo for half the cost! (Must be used consecutively with first day.)" My point is that both Bronx and Omaha could conceivably be one-day zoos if they had summer hours like Pairi Dazia.

Of course we are all looking at zoos through the lens of being zoo enthusiasts, which admittedly was something I stated in the opening of this thread. When I take my wife and 4 young kids south to Seattle's Woodland Park Zoo (a round-trip drive of 5 hours!) we NEVER see the whole zoo in a day. There have been occasions when we spend 5 hours driving there and back and 5 hours at the zoo but only see a third of what is on offer. Young kids drag their feet around whenever they get tired and walk at the speed of drunken sloths, plus they get hungry and lunch is a full hour, plus there is an outdoor play area and an indoor Zoomazium center, plus there are wild squirrels rampaging around. We have plenty of squirrels in our backyard (as well as deer, raccoons, opossums, coyotes and the odd bear or cougar) but when at the zoo the kids are enthralled by squirrels and run past boring old gorillas and part of my heart breaks. Haha! If I took my brood to Berlin Zoo we'd probably get through the aquarium and by then it would be closing time!
 
Back
Top