what is one of the most disappointing habitats in zoos you have gone to

ilovetimberdoodles

Active Member
I have not gone too many zoos but I am still fascinated with them mostly just since I like animals, in my opinion I think that the sand hill crane habitat in the Detroit zoo is a little disappointing, its not that its bad but it seems like a little of a case of less quality in it due to less popularity to animals like the polar bears, giraffes, penguins, etc.
 
Florida Aquarium's penguin exhibit, it is an embarrassment. Fortunately it is intended to be replaced with a very nice outdoor habitat in the next couple of years. I am not sure why they bothered building this strange exhibit when most everything else at the aquarium is done really well. It should be noted that this exhibit opened in 2022.

full
 
Last edited:
Zoo African Safari near of Toulouse, during the drive-in Safari. When you have a drive-in Safari, you see animals in large enclosures and they can eventually move between cars. But in this drive-in Safari, some animals are in smaller enclosures like elephants, camels, rhinos and lions. And the most funny with lions, the exhibit (very small) is in the middle of antelopes and zebras, but fortunatly they can't escape. I don't understand the sense to put animals in smaller exhibit you can see from your car as you see them in pedestrian part. You lost the fun of the drive-in Safari.

lewp.jpg

Meanwhile, in Sigean, no fences between rhinos and cars.
bnhf.jpg
 
The Arctic Ring of Life in its current state.

*runs off*
While I happened to like Arctic Ring of Life (though not as much as the amphibian and penguin buildings), I can see why you would find it disappointing. I can't help but wonder, if the US polar bear population was doing better, if Arctic Ring of Life could be a genuinely much more impressive exhibit with a larger group of polar bears. There are nine polar bears in Assiniboine Park Zoo's Journey to Churchill. How awesome would Detroit's exhibit be if they even had four or five?! If I was to pick a most disappointing habitat at Detroit, it'd probably instead be the Great Apes complex. Gorillas don't live in the savanna!

To speak more broadly than Detroit, I'd actually argue though, I don't think there's a single zoo that doesn't have a single disappointing exhibit. Oftentimes, we judge zoo exhibits relative to the zoo they are in, so if there is one exhibit that is just "okay", or even outright good, in a zoo that is otherwise phenomenal, that exhibit will stand out in disappointing. In some regards, I'd call something like Bronx's leopard exhibit, which is subpar but by all means far from awful, actually more disappointing than some of the hideous exhibits at roadside zoos, simply because Bronx is a zoo that we'd expect so much more from, and this leopard exhibit is in a zoo that also boasts some of the best exhibits in the country. While many of the exhibits at roadside zoos are downright horrendous, I wouldn't necessarily use the word "disappointing" to describe them.
 
The Florida Aquarium's Penguin Exhibit was not open when I visited in January 2022, but this otherwise excellent facility had another letdown on hand; the Madagascar exhibit. It features one of the worst Lemur exhibits I've seen (with Riverbanks, Greenville, and Lazy 5 Ranch also being up there) and a few uninteresting reptile exhibits. The only good enclosure was the clone coral reef habitat. Also, the exhibit feels very out-of-place as it's located "above" the Wetlands of Florida exhibit.

Some others I can think of;

Jacksonville Zoo's Australia: Jacksonville is a very high quality zoo (currently my highest-ranking Florida facility), but the Australia exhibit feels like an afterthought. All you get are bog standard habitats for Emus and a bog standard Lorikeet aviary. You can skip it and not miss anything. Granted, the Amphibian Conservation Center is also located here, but it's thematically disconnected from the rest of the complex.

Zoo Atlanta is another elite zoo with a top-notch reptile house and excellent Africa and Asia exhibits, so when I got to the Exotic Bird aviaries afterwards, I was let down by the scattering of spacious, but otherwise uninteresting wood-and-wire aviaries with a decent but unspectacular collection. It felt like quite a sharp contrast from the previous exhibits at the zoo.

ZooTampa's Main Avairy; ZooTampa itself is a hodgepodge of disappointment exhibits, but for me, the one that sticks out the most is the Main Aviary. This large exhibit towers over the main plaza, and it looked impressive. I was very eager to check it out. But once inside, I was sorely disappointed by the lackluster path layout, the large ugly wooden structure at the very center seemingly left to rot, and the exhibit itself feeling very underpopulated. Compared to the excellent walk-through aviaries I experienced that same week, including those at Disney's Animal Kingdom, Florida Aquarium, and Jacksonville, I was very underwhelmed by what ZooTampa had to offer.
 
Toledo zoo's Tembo Trail was immensely disappointing for me. The complex is a very strange hodgepodge of various continents (why are there otters?) (Why is there a Tasmanian devil?) And all the exhibits are fairly small for being barely over 10 years old. I find it just plain odd that more of the space isn't being dedicated to the stars of the show: the elephants, especially when they have clear intent to keep growing their herd.
 
the California Sea Lion and Harbour Seal exhibit at Georgia Aquarium, for an aquarium that's in the running for best in the world, the embarrassingly small public exhibit for their pinnipeds is an extreme low for an otherwise world class facility, its something that I hope can be fixed in the future, I do know they have a larger behind the scenes area, but still it just didn't sit right with me.
 
the California Sea Lion and Harbour Seal exhibit at Georgia Aquarium, for an aquarium that's in the running for best in the world, the embarrassingly small public exhibit for their pinnipeds is an extreme low for an otherwise world class facility, its something that I hope can be fixed in the future, I do know they have a larger behind the scenes area, but still it just didn't sit right with me.

The Harbor Seals were actually mixed with the Belugas during my June 2022 visit. Otherwise, yeah, the Sea Lion exhibit is a huge letdown. Not only is it too small, but the viewing is horrible as well.
 
The Harbor Seals were actually mixed with the Belugas during my June 2022 visit. Otherwise, yeah, the Sea Lion exhibit is a huge letdown. Not only is it too small, but the viewing is horrible as well.
there was harbours with the belugas during my visit aswell,but there was also a single harbour seal with the sea lions.
 
Saint Louis Zoo's Primate Canopy Trails, which is still an exhibit I find very innovative and smart and a model for other zoos with historic primate buildings to follow -- but my imagination ultimately went higher than the final product, and the blending of children's playground elements and primate viewing was almost too seamless for my personal taste. The most enchanting moment was ruined somewhat by dirty glass. I would still consider it a great exhibit but to say it wasn't disappointing would be denial of my real feelings, and it did not live up to some of the more impressive exhibits at the facility overall. I hope other zoos learn from it and build on it, and I suspect Brookfield is doing exactly that.

I was initially disappointed with Regenstein Macaque Forest at Lincoln Park Zoo, which I feel almost guilty about as it has since become one of my favorite primate exhibits, and ditto for Walter Family Arctic Tundra, which I really didn't begin to appreciate until I actually saw polar bears using the habitat and then it just kind of hit different. These are both great exhibits that I just couldn't appreciate at first.

I was weirdly thinking about this earlier today. Weak pinniped exhibits seem to be a recurring trend in acclaimed US aquariums, as the New England Aquarium has an awful harbor seal exhibit and an okay sea lion exhibit.
I agree. I hate to even bring it up but the Shedd Aquarium also has a pretty weak pinniped exhibit (currently sea lions but has held seals in the past) as well.
 
Saint Louis Zoo's Primate Canopy Trails, which is still an exhibit I find very innovative and smart and a model for other zoos with historic primate buildings to follow -- but my imagination ultimately went higher than the final product, and the blending of children's playground elements and primate viewing was almost too seamless for my personal taste. The most enchanting moment was ruined somewhat by dirty glass. I would still consider it a great exhibit but to say it wasn't disappointing would be denial of my real feelings, and it did not live up to some of the more impressive exhibits at the facility overall. I hope other zoos learn from it and build on it, and I suspect Brookfield is doing exactly that.

I was initially disappointed with Regenstein Macaque Forest at Lincoln Park Zoo, which I feel almost guilty about as it has since become one of my favorite primate exhibits, and ditto for Walter Family Arctic Tundra, which I really didn't begin to appreciate until I actually saw polar bears using the habitat and then it just kind of hit different. These are both great exhibits that I just couldn't appreciate at first.


I agree. I hate to even bring it up but the Shedd Aquarium also has a pretty weak pinniped exhibit (currently sea lions but has held seals in the past) as well.
I haven’t been, but I’ve seen what the exhibit looks like. Why is this the one area these big names skimp on? The only pinniped exhibits I’ve seen in aquariums I actually like are New York and Mystic, and they still aren’t perfect.
 
Back
Top