. . . . apart from the camera and lens(es)?
Our thread about African hunting dogs in the Chester Zoo forum went off at a tangent, which was largely my fault, so I have decided to widen the discussion here.
I always carry a spare, fully charged, camera battery with a lens cleaning cloth and a blower brush. But I think the most important extras are my four spare memory cards (4, 4, 2 and 1 GB) to back up the 8GB card that I load into my camera at the start of the day. I reason that if something extraordinary happened, like a bird of paradise courtship display or a giraffe birth or a cub emerging from the den for the first time, I might want to take 200 shots in 15 minutes, so not having plenty of space could be a very false economy as memory is so cheap now.
In the old days of film, I could only afford to take 70 or 100 shots in a day, even if I had spent a lot of money travelling to the zoo, paying for admission and so on, so I had to think carefully and judge the moment for each shot as exactly as I could. All amateurs were in more or less the same position: only professionals could afford to take hundreds of pictures in a day, so they could afford to take chances and they got many more knockout photos than amateurs could.
Now I am in that position too. I can take 800 shots a day if I want to and I can pick out the half dozen best ones with a supercritical eye. It's wonderful
I shoot in RAW format, so I do need more memory than someone who is only shooting jpgs, but the same principle applies. I am convinced that an extra memory card and a spare rechargeable battery could improve anyone's photography.
Alan
Our thread about African hunting dogs in the Chester Zoo forum went off at a tangent, which was largely my fault, so I have decided to widen the discussion here.
I always carry a spare, fully charged, camera battery with a lens cleaning cloth and a blower brush. But I think the most important extras are my four spare memory cards (4, 4, 2 and 1 GB) to back up the 8GB card that I load into my camera at the start of the day. I reason that if something extraordinary happened, like a bird of paradise courtship display or a giraffe birth or a cub emerging from the den for the first time, I might want to take 200 shots in 15 minutes, so not having plenty of space could be a very false economy as memory is so cheap now.
In the old days of film, I could only afford to take 70 or 100 shots in a day, even if I had spent a lot of money travelling to the zoo, paying for admission and so on, so I had to think carefully and judge the moment for each shot as exactly as I could. All amateurs were in more or less the same position: only professionals could afford to take hundreds of pictures in a day, so they could afford to take chances and they got many more knockout photos than amateurs could.
Now I am in that position too. I can take 800 shots a day if I want to and I can pick out the half dozen best ones with a supercritical eye. It's wonderful
I shoot in RAW format, so I do need more memory than someone who is only shooting jpgs, but the same principle applies. I am convinced that an extra memory card and a spare rechargeable battery could improve anyone's photography.
Alan
Last edited: