Where are the great endemic zoos of the world?

CGSwans

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Ever since visiting Bali Zoo in early August I've been firmly convinced that it's missing its calling as Indonesia's endemic zoo. In a country that's home to elephants, tigers, leopards, sun bears, otters, orang utans, gibbons, macaques, proboscis monkeys, tapirs, babirusas, Komodo dragons, crocodiles, giant pythons, cassowaries, eagles, cockatoos and many other charismatic megafauna, it would have little trouble succeeding with such a focus. It doesn't need the current lions and white tiger.

Coming from Australia, I'm familiar with zoos that have a strictly native focus. I've been to two of them - Healesville and Cleland - that are accepted as masters of the approach, using the existing bush landscape to display primarily local fauna, along with some animals that are from other parts of Australia but are nevertheless suited to the local conditions. Alice Springs Desert Park is somewhere I haven't been, but i understand that it follows the same template for Australian desert environments. These places work because they're relatively cheap to build, stock and maintain, and because both Australians and international tourists want to see native fauna. Yes, there's an opportunity cost in not displaying exotics, but some successful native parks seem to thrive in the same markets as larger zoos focused on exotics. This is despite the general impression in Australia that our native species are "boring" compared to those from overseas.

However, it does seem that there are relatively few other large-scale endemics-focused zoos outside Australia. I'm aware of Northwest Trek and Arizona-Sonora in the western US. And the Arabian Wildlife Centre in the UAE sounds like it fits the description as well. But the Highland Wildlife Park in Scotland eventually diversified beyond Scottish fauna to boost visitor numbers. Is there a zoo now in Europe that focuses entirely on the animals of Europe, let alone its country's native wildlife?

I'm particularly keen to hear about institutions in mega diverse developing countries - such as China, India, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, which might fly under Zoochat's radar a little. Like Indonesia, these countries are all home to charismatic species and attract large numbers of tourists who could effectively underwrite an endemics zoo in the right location. But would be interested in any parks that, by design, display the species of a particular region or country.
 
The Uganda Wildlife Education Center looks like a nice zoo that focuses on the wildlife of Uganda with species like bush pigs, Uganda kob, Rothschild's giraffes, etc. Nick@Amsterdam has some nice pictures of it in the Africa gallery.
 
Last edited:
The Uganda Wildlife Education Center looks like a nice zoo that focuses on the wildlife of Uganda with species like bush pigs, Nile lechwe, Rothschild's giraffes, etc. Nick@Amsterdam has some nice pictures of it in the Africa gallery.

Entebbe's UWEC is the only zoo in the world exhibiting giant forest hogs, and one of the few with Uganda kob.

A similar facility is the 'Nairobi Safari Walk' on the perimeter of Nairobi National Park--visited by more Kenyans than all of the country's national parks combined

The Belize Zoo is an excellent example of an endemic zoo. And then there's Austria's terrific Alpenzoo.
 
Awesome, folks, thanks. I didn't realise that Alpenzoo was strictly Austrian fauna - I had thought it had animals from across montane and northern biomes. Hadn't heard of UWEC, Nairobi Safari Walk or Belize Zoo.
 
The US is so large and varied that the need for these type of zoos isn't particularly needed except for the above mentioned desert type zoo in the Southwest.

America has too many readily available and accessible wild lands. Why go to a zoo to see the fauna of the Southeastern US for example (Whitetail, Black Bear, Boar, Cougar, Red Tailed Hawk, Eastern CoyWolf) when I can see them either in my backyard or at a national park that is easily accessible.

Now North Carolina Zoo does a good job with bringing the fauna of the American West to the Carolina Low County but those animals (Wolf Bison Elk) are as out of place as the animals in the African Section.
 
India - Himalayas
Padma Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park

Mexico - state of Sonora
Centro Ecologico de Sonora

Canada - state of British Columbia
BC Wildlife Park

United States - Desert Southwest
Arizona Sonora Desert Museum (Arizona)
Living Desert Zoo and Gardens (New Mexico)
Spring River Park Zoo (New Mexico)
Wildlife West (New Mexico)

United States - General
Bearizona (Arizona)
California Living Museum (California)
Curiodessey (California)
High Desert Museum (Oregon)
Lee G Simmons Conservation Park (Nebraska)
Northwest Trek (Washington)
 
The US is so large and varied that the need for these type of zoos isn't particularly needed except for the above mentioned desert type zoo in the Southwest.

I would really disagree with this assessment as I think many people have no idea of the biological treasures in their own back yards (literally and figuratively). There are several outstanding "endemic zoos" (I like that term) in the U.S.

The Alaska Sealife center is an aquarium in Seward Alaska that focuses on the sea life of the ocean outside of it. My in-laws have visited and raved about it. They have tufted puffins, sea otters, Steller's sea lions, among other local Alaskan species.

The Monterey Aquarium is famous for focusing mainly on the local ecosystems that are literally outside its door.

The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum has been mentioned.

The Las Vegas Springs Preserve has a small zoological collection focusing on Mojave Desert species (grey fox, Merriam's kangaroo rat, pallid bats, Gila monsters, many other lizard and snake species, etc.),

The Omaha Zoo has a wildlife park that doesn't get mentioned here much that focuses on species of the great plains of the Mid-west including wolves, black bears, bison, elk, sandhill cranes, etc. It is quite good.

Northwest Trek in Washington state gets glowing reviews here for its exhibits of species endemic to (surprise) the Pacific Northwest.

Many states and regions in the U.S. have some kind of zoo or wildlife park focusing on endemic species, frequently with animals that have been injured, kept as pets, etc. and cannot be released. These collections usually include birds of prey, bobcats, deer, rabbits, mountain lions, coyotes, etc.
 
New Zealand has a large number of native bird parks, often also displaying native reptiles, although many of these also display feral, domestic and exotic species (usually minimal in contrast with the natives though). Examples include: Zealandia, Nga Manu, Wingspan, Otorohanga Kiwi House, Owlcatraz, Kiwi Birdlife Park, etc, etc. Otorohanga is probbaly the best of these, in terms of number of species displayed.

In Sweden, the animal collection at Skansen (Stockholm) is composed of Swedish species, but it mostly displays large mammals, not many birds. The Skanes Djurpark (in southern Sweden) states that it displays only 'Nordic animals', and this is largely true, depending on the definition of Nordic used (it might be a mis-translation of "northern", I'm not sure). They have over 80 species, but a few are not Scandinavian at all (e.g. Raccoon Dog, Przewalski's Horse). It has a great collection though, with probbaly the best display of Scandinavian species in the world.

I didn't see any other endemic zoos in Europe, but then that was not really what I was looking for. There certainly are several small wildlife centres in Britain with native species, and the same is likely true of the continent.
 
I would really disagree with this assessment as I think many people have no idea of the biological treasures in their own back yards (literally and figuratively). There are several outstanding "endemic zoos" (I like that term) in the U.S.

The Alaska Sealife center is an aquarium in Seward Alaska that focuses on the sea life of the ocean outside of it. My in-laws have visited and raved about it. They have tufted puffins, sea otters, Steller's sea lions, among other local Alaskan species.

The Monterey Aquarium is famous for focusing mainly on the local ecosystems that are literally outside its door.

The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum has been mentioned.

The Las Vegas Springs Preserve has a small zoological collection focusing on Mojave Desert species (grey fox, Merriam's kangaroo rat, pallid bats, Gila monsters, many other lizard and snake species, etc.),

The Omaha Zoo has a wildlife park that doesn't get mentioned here much that focuses on species of the great plains of the Mid-west including wolves, black bears, bison, elk, sandhill cranes, etc. It is quite good.

Northwest Trek in Washington state gets glowing reviews here for its exhibits of species endemic to (surprise) the Pacific Northwest.

Many states and regions in the U.S. have some kind of zoo or wildlife park focusing on endemic species, frequently with animals that have been injured, kept as pets, etc. and cannot be released. These collections usually include birds of prey, bobcats, deer, rabbits, mountain lions, coyotes, etc.

all those you mentioned either cater to niche environments or to me the equivalent of the smaller "wildlife center" or road side attractions. When he meant Zoos I was assuming the big AZA accredited type zoos. There is really is no big zoo in the US that specifically caters to the North American Species especially the bigger ones.

We just have differing opinions of what a "zoo" is I guess. I don't consider a museum keeping a few species or the animal equivalent of a Nursing Home/Rehab Hospital as a zoo.
 
New Zealand has a large number of native bird parks, often also displaying native reptiles, although many of these also display feral, domestic and exotic species (usually minimal in contrast with the natives though). Examples include: Zealandia, Nga Manu, Wingspan, Otorohanga Kiwi House, Owlcatraz, Kiwi Birdlife Park, etc, etc. Otorohanga is probbaly the best of these, in terms of number of species displayed.

I dislike Zealandia/Karori Wildlife Sanctuary being lumped in with zoos and bird parks. Apart for a couple of notable exceptions (takahe and geckoes) all the wildlife there is wild. If you're going to include Zealandia then you have to also include all the offshore islands under zoos; the only difference is that one is bound by a fence and one is bound by water.
 
all those you mentioned either cater to niche environments or to me the equivalent of the smaller "wildlife center" or road side attractions. When he meant Zoos I was assuming the big AZA accredited type zoos. There is really is no big zoo in the US that specifically caters to the North American Species especially the bigger ones.

We just have differing opinions of what a "zoo" is I guess. I don't consider a museum keeping a few species or the animal equivalent of a Nursing Home/Rehab Hospital as a zoo.

The Monterey Aquarium, Arizona-Desert Museum, Omaha Wildlife Park, and Northwest Trek are major AZA zoos/aquariums. I don't think anybody would consider them roadside attractions.

Many people consider Monterey and ASDM to be among the best zoological institutions in the world. That shows that the concept of the endemic zoo can be a powerful one.
 
David did you see the part where I said Niche environments? That is what I am saying. The ones that do exist either specialize like the sea, the desert, the plains, or the northwest.

There is no big all encompassing "big zoo" that is just an endemic north american zoo.
 
Coming from Australia, I'm familiar with zoos that have a strictly native focus. I've been to two of them - Healesville and Cleland - that are accepted as masters of the approach, using the existing bush landscape to display primarily local fauna, along with some animals that are from other parts of Australia but are nevertheless suited to the local conditions. Alice Springs Desert Park is somewhere I haven't been, but i understand that it follows the same template for Australian desert environments. These places work because they're relatively cheap to build, stock and maintain, and because both Australians and international tourists want to see native fauna. Yes, there's an opportunity cost in not displaying exotics, but some successful native parks seem to thrive in the same markets as larger zoos focused on exotics. This is despite the general impression in Australia that our native species are "boring" compared to those from overseas.

Another fantastic Australian collection that I visited probably about 10 years ago is Currumbin Sanctuary in southern Queensland. The list of small native-only attractions would go on and on but one of my favourites is still Kyabram Fauna Park.
 
David did you see the part where I said Niche environments? That is what I am saying. The ones that do exist either specialize like the sea, the desert, the plains, or the northwest.

There is no big all encompassing "big zoo" that is just an endemic north american zoo.

I wasn't sure what you meant by "niche environment". Thanks for clarifying. I think you are right about there being no comprehensive "big" zoo. The only thing like that which comes to mind is ZooAmerica in Pennsylvania which apparently covers many of the major ecosystems of North America, but is a relatively small zoo from the way people have described it.
 
David did you see the part where I said Niche environments? That is what I am saying. The ones that do exist either specialize like the sea, the desert, the plains, or the northwest.

There is no big all encompassing "big zoo" that is just an endemic north american zoo.

And yet, I clearly included "regional" themed collections in my question. So niche environments are fine by me. :)

Personally, I do draw a distinction between what I'll call a 'curated' collection (like Healesville or Northwest Trek) and a rescue or rehab centre, which is composed of local widlife not by conscious intent but as a necessary result of how it sources animals. I don't really consider the latter to be zoos, important though their work is. Having said that, I don't presume to tell people not to name them if they wish.

Currumbin is a tricky one. It, like Australian Reptile Park, Ballarat Wildlife Park and Featherdale Wildlife Park to name a few are *almost* exclusively native parks, but all have a small handful of exotic birds or reptiles. So they don't strictly speaking qualify by my reckoning. True, Healesville Sanctuary also technically transgresses by having a Goodfellow's Tree Kangaroo, but I give this a pass on the basis that PNG is biologically part of the Australian continent.

Thanks for everybody's nominations - look forward to seeing more. :)
 
I would really disagree with this assessment as I think many people have no idea of the biological treasures in their own back yards (literally and figuratively). There are several outstanding "endemic zoos" (I like that term) in the U.S.

The Alaska Sealife center is an aquarium in Seward Alaska that focuses on the sea life of the ocean outside of it. My in-laws have visited and raved about it. They have tufted puffins, sea otters, Steller's sea lions, among other local Alaskan species.

The Monterey Aquarium is famous for focusing mainly on the local ecosystems that are literally outside its door.

The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum has been mentioned.

The Las Vegas Springs Preserve has a small zoological collection focusing on Mojave Desert species (grey fox, Merriam's kangaroo rat, pallid bats, Gila monsters, many other lizard and snake species, etc.),

The Omaha Zoo has a wildlife park that doesn't get mentioned here much that focuses on species of the great plains of the Mid-west including wolves, black bears, bison, elk, sandhill cranes, etc. It is quite good.

Northwest Trek in Washington state gets glowing reviews here for its exhibits of species endemic to (surprise) the Pacific Northwest.

Many states and regions in the U.S. have some kind of zoo or wildlife park focusing on endemic species, frequently with animals that have been injured, kept as pets, etc. and cannot be released. These collections usually include birds of prey, bobcats, deer, rabbits, mountain lions, coyotes, etc.

Agreed, there are also a large number of "nature centers" in the US that exhibit examples of native fauna including larger species such as red wolves and mountain lions. These facilities often pass under our radar as they don't advertise themselves as "zoos".

One good example is the Western North Carolina Nature Center. Western North Carolina Nature Center, Asheville, North Carolina > Your Visit > Planning Your Visit

Or the Squam Lakes Nature Center.
Animal Exhibits and Trails | Squam Lakes Natural Science Center

Or the Beartooth Nature Center in Red Lodge, Montana
The Conservation Assessment Program ? Spotlight Article 20th Anniversary
 
I take that back. If that pull that off it will be my favorite place in the world. Ive always been interested in the fauna of ancient Southern Appalachians. I live in the area. If you have seen the Bear Grylls Alabama episode I am 15 miles from that. Its not really that wild. He was never more than a mile from a road.
 
that Western North Carolina Nature Center looks nice but still comes across as most of the attractions around the Smokies do.

I guess I don't quite follow what you are saying.

By the way, the WNCNC is accredited by the AZA.
 
Sorry I prejudged based on location/experience. This concept has been tried and failed many times and basically results in a poor roadside zoo that is there to get money off the traffic headed to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Like something that would be around Pigeon Forge or Gatlinburg.

But I went to the website and it seems awesome. I am personally struck by their 2020 plan and its focus on accessibility. My father is in a wheelchair and I am often frustrated how zoos often over look the concept that some of their guests will be disabled.

When they get the prehistoric Appalachian part done I will be a frequent visitor.
 
Sorry I prejudged based on location/experience. This concept has been tried and failed many times and basically results in a poor roadside zoo that is there to get money off the traffic headed to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Like something that would be around Pigeon Forge or Gatlinburg.

But I went to the website and it seems awesome. I am personally struck by their 2020 plan and its focus on accessibility. My father is in a wheelchair and I am often frustrated how zoos often over look the concept that some of their guests will be disabled.

When they get the prehistoric Appalachian part done I will be a frequent visitor.

I started a new thread to discuss the WNCNC Vision 2020 masterplan and the Prehistoric Appalachia aspect of it in particular.

http://www.zoochat.com/22/vision-2020-masterplan-300431/#post620399
 
Back
Top