As the lone voice (so far) in favour of Wuppertal, I have been thinking why it is that I feel it ranks ahead of Twycross in this category.
Whilst I have been doing that thinking,
@SabineB has brilliantly articulated much of what I was thinking, above.
Although Wuppertal is a long way from perfect, and I am deeply suspicious of its future direction, I feel that it is a zoo which does things well, professionally, in a very German way (as described by Sabine). Its Monkey House is old-fashioned, certainly, but the way in which the collection has been managed - still diverse, but not at the expense of animal welfare, with a sensible downsizing in place - seems to be intelligent. The Ape House I like. The various outdoor enclosures which have been added over the years have hugely improved it, and, while certainly this is not cutting edge zoo design, there is a sense of things being done well.
Twycross’s
thing is, obviously, primates. And I hate the way in which some seek to condemn Twycross, viciously, for everything they do. But, despite things certainly improving on the primate front, I still feel that Twycross has a long way to go: the Orang housing is pretty awful; the Gorilla exhibit is poor; the Chimps have been terrible (although maybe that is improving, as we debate). The Bonobos don’t lift the overall level of quality. The newish Gibbon House could be good, but still doesn’t seem to have bedded down. And while the monkey collection is still fairly large, there is a clear sense of its slipping away - with none of the exhibitry being anything special. Lemurs and callitrichids: yes, fine, but no more than that. So, overall, I’m not sure there’s anything at Twycross, primate-wise, that one would take for a fantasy zoo, so nothing to lift it to the level that suggests a thumping win should be theirs.