Barcelona Zoo and Valencia Bioparc Visit Short Review

Nikola Chavkosk

Well-Known Member
Hello zoochatters,
I hope so my reviews are interesting in some way to you. Last Saturday I returned from trip in Spain, and here is my short (and informative) reviews of my visits of the Barcelona zoo (on the 28th of March) and the Valencia bioparc (on the 30th of March). I don't visited the L'Oceanographic Valencia (because I need to work 30 hours here for the ticket, but some other next time for sure).

The zoo animals that I saw for the first time in my life in person at these two zoos were: Brazilian tapir, spotted hyena, long-haired spider monkeys, Eastern bongo, mohr gazelle, dorcas gazelle, fossa, aardwark, African white-headed vulture, wattled jacanas, Galapagos giant tortoise, Utila spiny-tailed iguana, among some other smaller zoo animals.

1. Barcelona Zoo (28th March) (ticket for adult 19.9 euro):
- Despite someone wrote that the zoo is decreasing it's animal enclosure qualities or that is facing financial difficulties, the zoo is great and very nice, at the level of Tierpark Hellabrunn, and all of the animals looked well-fed and cared for. I was at the zoo entrance in 09:30, but zoo opened at 10:00 starting with a crowd of French students from primary school. It is easily reachable since it is in the centre of Barcelona neighboring the central city park.
- The part of the zoo that I liked the most was African savannah section (housing African bush elephants, Rotschild's giraffes, white rhinoceros and common hippos). It was under construction. I saw 3 African bush elephants (which as with most zoos, were not very interested in what they are doing), 3 common hippos and just one male white rhino.
- The rhino enclosure was relatively small, it should be bigger.
- The Komodo dragon new exhibit is great, but of 4 Komodo dragons I observed at the zoo, 2 were kept in small terraria in the reptile house.
- We don't have access to the dolphinarium.
- House for tropical birds was nice and hot; I liked that not all tropical birds are mixed in one big aviary, but there were several smaller aviaries with fewer species. Some birds in the tropical house: Common trumpeter, Bali myna, wattled jacanas or Brazilian tanagers.
- Outdoor aviaries mostly for parrots (but also for kokaburra, and some other birds) were eye-catching and high, but had limited opportunities for horizontal flying of the birds.
- Reptile house from outside is old, but inside renovated first-class design (except relatively small teraria for some snakes). I still think that reptilarium without venomous snakes is not complete, as it was the Barcelona zoo's reptilarium. Crocodile part of the reptilarium housed some rare crocodiles (but I don't take a picture because my battery was spent). The terarria for caimans, turtles, tortoises were very creatively build. I saw Utila spiny-tailed iguana. I would prefer natural lights for reptilaria whenever possible.
- The ape section was great, with glass-viewing. There were two groups of gorillas with several youngs.
- Brown bear enclosures were new and quite nice.
- I didn't like the stepped enclosures for lions and tigers (I did not see any tiger).
- The aviary for water birds (like for African spoonbill) was big and some of the birds were flying in circles.
- The zoo is quite demanding and I need several rests to concentrate more so I will pay greater attention to the upcoming enclosures and their inhabitants. I spent 7.5 hours in the zoo.
- The zoo had a lot of visitors, more than Valencia bioparc, and the park was still lively with visitors at 17:20 h, which was not case with Valencia bioparc.

2. Valencia bioparc (30th March) (ticket price for adult 23.8 euro):
- Definitively more exciting than Barcelona zoo, Tierpark Hellabrunn (Munich), Attica Zoological Park (in Athens, Greece) and other zoos I have visited so far. I think it will stay on my list of top 3 best zoos that I will ever visit (together maybe, with the San Diego zoo, and with Cologne/Zurich/Bronx/Zoorasia/ zoo).
- If you are going to visit I recommend to start with the equatorial section on the right of the park because it is more exciting than savannah section. It includes fantastic enclosures for pygmmy hippos, bongos, other tropical rainforest hoofstock, some birds, Madagascar fauna, leopards, gorillas, chimpanzees, mangabay, drills.
- It is interesting that when you enter the entrance, you are not actually in the park, but first you need to walk very long bridge above non-zoo land (park of Valencia), that will bring you in the zoo proper.
- I enjoyed every square metre of the park. I was constantly saying wow, wow. In this zoo, there is not a square enclosure, classical with mesh. The whole park is an amazing, awe-inspiring concept, despite having mainly African species (around 120), and no parrots for example.
- Unfortunately, I didn't see just the lemur section, because they were working something there.
- The leopard exhibit was fantastic, with several extensions, included grass-paddocks, waterfall and water pond, rocks, roofed with mesh and with glass-viewing from several places.
- There were interesting and exciting interenclosure designs throughout the park, like caves, rocky edges and hills, clefts in rocks looking into the enclosure (like the picture with the forest buffalo or gazelles grazing), narrow elevations, etc. Ape enclosures were fantastic too, different and awe-inspiring when viewed from different corners.
- I saw 5 African bush elephants. The park has potential to expand beyond into surrounding, and that will be great for the elephants, if they will have access to a grassy meadow.
- I attended the bird show (mostly) in the park amphitheatre, which included several species like: CR EN African white-headed vulture, Egyptian vulture, African fish eagle, crowned crane, black-backed jackal, porcupines. It included interesting education talks for conservation of the wildlife on Spanish (which I understand quite a lot).
- Many of the hoofstock (like gazelles or other antelopes, and even giraffes) had access to grassy paddock, but not red forest buffalos, Eastern bongos or red river hogs.
- There was a Rotschild's giraffe dam with its calf, separated in interesting enclosure (I have pictures in the section Valencia bioparc on Zoochat).
- I didn't like a lot the spotted hyena enclosure, which was stepping, but it was quite big and can be extended.
- Throughout the park there are several speakers emitting interesting noises from wildlife, making the general atmosphere more exciting.
- The park visitors number peak was in 13:00 o'clock, and in 16:00 the park was almost empty. It opened at 10:00 (and again I was there at 09:30). I spent 7 hours at the park and made two circles. It is good that you generally need to follow one walking road and will see all of the enclosures - so you can't get lost in the park's network of road.
- I didn't see the Nile crocodile(s) in the pool, but I saw African dwarf croc in a cave.

Any other additional explanations, I will eventually post via new replies.
I stayed in a hostel with Brits, Germans, Argentinians. I won't tell the sex ratio :)
 
Last edited:
We were ships in the night Nikola, as I was at Valencia on the 28th and Barcelona on the 30th. I agree with your assessment of Barcelona, though unfortunately I was very disappointed by Valencia.

It is a terrible shame that you were unable to visit Oceanografic, as it is one of a kind. Hopefully you will make it to Spain again one day.
 
We were ships in the night Nikola, as I was at Valencia on the 28th and Barcelona on the 30th. I agree with your assessment of Barcelona, though unfortunately I was very disappointed by Valencia.

It is a terrible shame that you were unable to visit Oceanografic, as it is one of a kind. Hopefully you will make it to Spain again one day.

I was at Valencia Biopark on the 28th too! In fact it was my second visit in a week (well, nine days) as I enjoyed it that much :) From a photography point of view, it offers so many opportunities to get clear shots of the majority of the animals and on both days, I was there for a full 8 hours and took nearly 3 thousand shots :) although many are near duplicate, or just rubbish.

On the 28th, I did get into the Lemur section, where only the Mongoose variety kept themselves out of the way, whereas the rest scampered and bounced around quite freely. I missed the bird (and other animals) show on the first visit, but caught it on the second, but it was hard going as I have no Spanish understanding what so ever; I can imagine it is horrible in mid summer sitting in the exposed stand.
 
I still think that reptilarium without venomous snakes is not complete,
I think that's going to be the norm in more and more zoos. Having specially trained staff and professional safety protocols in accordance with local legislative (including finding an insurance company willing to insure you) is becoming a too costly and thus expendable factor for many zoos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The zoo animals that I saw for the first time in my life in person at these two zoos were: Brazilian tapir, spotted hyena, long-haired spider monkeys, Eastern bongo, mohr gazelle, dorcas gazelle, fossa, aardwark, African white-headed vulture, wattled jacanas, Galapagos giant tortoise, Utila spiny-tailed iguana, among some other smaller zoo animals.

- I saw 5 African bush elephants. The park has potential to expand beyond into surrounding, and that will be great for the elephants, if they will have access to a grassy meadow.

- I saw another interesting animal, in Barcelona zoo, for the first time in person, although they were lying high at the platform, namely, black and gold howler monkey.

- At Valencia bioparc, actualy there was another African bush elephant, bull, that was kept separate, so the total number goes to 6 (if not more), African bush elephants in Valencia bioparc. The other 5 were in a herd together.

-Another interesting point about Valencia bioparc is that for most zoo animals, there is not an indoor viewing (perhaps due to mild climate - the park has been already very green as in summer). Indoor viewing is limited to some animals like reptiles (chameleon, African dwarf crocodiles, some boids), aardwarks, porcupines, rats, etc. There is not indoor viewing for example for gorillas or for chimpanzees.
 
Me and my wife have just got back from a great week in Valencia, such a great city, with two amazing animal collections. The Bioparc was amazing; we were in awe when a pygmy hippo emerged from the water in an enclosure containing sitatunga, drill, pelicans and talapoin monkeys! The mix in some of the exhibits was refreshing to the norm. The Oceanografic was good but very expensive - after we had paid for entry,the behind the scenes tours, had lunch we had spent 100 euros! Great to see walrus and Beluga whales for the first time, especially the young Beluga.
 
It`s always interesting to read other`s opinions about zoos, thank you!

Nicola, have you visited Munich zoo? I have a very hard time believing that someone who has visited Munich would compare it to Barcelona and rank Barcelona as high as Munich. I have visited both zoos serveral times and I love Munich, it is surely one of the best parks in Europe. Munich zoo is located beautifully in natural forest and almost all enclosures are very good, very spacious and well-furnished and adapted to the animal`s needs. With the exeption of the outdoor areas of the chimps and gorillas, which are way too open for these animals who need cover and lots of opportunities to climb.

Barcelona in contrary is a city zoo which suffers from a lack of space and from the old spanish zoo tradition to keep all animals on concrete. Things have improved in Barcelona, but most enclosures are just acceptable and there is amost nothing that is better then "european average". The hippo area, for example, is new, and it`s terribly small. The elephant paddocks are very small and the giraffes don`t have that much more space. I know they are working on that area, but from the plans I have seen, neither elephants nor giraffes will get that much more space.
Neither would I rank the apes and monkey section in Barcelona as not more then adequate - or less. The monkey cages that the entrance are way too small and horribly outdated. The two gorilla and chimp enclosures are better, but they could be much better. They look nice to the visitor`s eyes because they are no cages, but the apes can`t use the mock rock, and to be really good, a lot more climbing and hiding possibilities would be needed. I hate that Barcelona uses so much fake rock on its new enclosures; it is very expensive and monkeys/apes would do much better in large cages/netted enclosures. The brand-new area for the white-napped mangabeys is a horrible example of terrible planning. It is very small with useless mock rock (that the visitors love...) and the little space could have been used much better if the enclosure would have been designed as a cage.
Nicola, I really advice you to visit Apenheul in the Netherlands one day to see how a really good gorilla habitat looks!

Then you`d see how poor the gorilla and chimp enclosures in the Bioparc Valencia are. First they are dangerous for the apes because they are surrounded by deep water moats. Then they are very badly equipped with climbing structures and there is not nearly enough hiding possibilities; they are all way too open for apes to feel comfortable there. The chimp island is the worst because it is also very small. The same critic is true for the mixed drill/pygmy hippo/antilope enclosure; for the amount of species and animals, it is small, and there are way too few climbing opportinities for the monkeys.
But Bioparc Valencia looks so nice for the visitor`s eyes that almost no one, not even zoo enthusiasts, realize that most enclosures are barely adequate or worse, really poor for the animals. The hyena enclosure is too small, same for the elephant and hippo areas. I don`t believe for a second that there is a possibility to enlarge these areas; the zoo is (almost) new and was designed exactly the way it is because the people behind it only care that it looks nice for the visitors. Additionally, the zoo almost went bancrupt a few years ago and any substantial changes are far off. The two big savannah enclosures are nice, I agree with that, but that`s it. Everything else is barely ok or even bad for the animals. That`s not ok for a new zoo that has cost hundred of millions of Euros to construct. I expected so much more from this new zoo.

By the way, there should be 8 elephants - 6 young females, 1 very big bull and 1 young bull.
 
Nicola, I really advice you to visit Apenheul in the Netherlands one day to see how a really good gorilla habitat looks!

Then you`d see how poor the gorilla and chimp enclosures in the Bioparc Valencia are. First they are dangerous for the apes because they are surrounded by deep water moats.
this question isn't a reflection on what you posted, because (without actually having been to Valencia, only having seen it from photos) I agree whole-heartedly with all your criticisms - it is just a question on this specific part: are the apes at Apenheul not also on moated islands? I thought they were.
 
this question isn't a reflection on what you posted, because (without actually having been to Valencia, only having seen it from photos) I agree whole-heartedly with all your criticisms - it is just a question on this specific part: are the apes at Apenheul not also on moated islands? I thought they were.

They are all on islands indeed...
 
Yes they are, but there are a few important differences that make their water moats a LOT safer then those in Valencia (and elsewhere): 1. the gorilla and bonobo islands in Apenheul are very spacious and, in case of conflict, give an animal a lot of space to escape "on land", while those in Valencia are on the (very) small side with little to no room for the animals to get out of each other`s ways and eyes; 2. the moats in Apenheul are very wide and very shallow on the animal`s side, so that an ape that falls into the water can get out unharmed. Many other zoos that have little space create water moats that get very deep too soon so that an animal has zero chance of getting out.
 
It`s always interesting to read other`s opinions about zoos, thank you!

Nicola, have you visited Munich zoo? I have a very hard time believing that someone who has visited Munich would compare it to Barcelona and rank Barcelona as high as Munich. I have visited both zoos serveral times and I love Munich, it is surely one of the best parks in Europe. Munich zoo is located beautifully in natural forest and almost all enclosures are very good, very spacious and well-furnished and adapted to the animal`s needs. With the exeption of the outdoor areas of the chimps and gorillas, which are way too open for these animals who need cover and lots of opportunities to climb.

Barcelona in contrary is a city zoo which suffers from a lack of space and from the old spanish zoo tradition to keep all animals on concrete. Things have improved in Barcelona, but most enclosures are just acceptable and there is amost nothing that is better then "european average". The hippo area, for example, is new, and it`s terribly small.

I appologise for the late answer, Yassa.
Yes I visited the Tierpark Hellabrunn in November 2015. Maybe the comparison with the Barcelona was too premature, but still, Barcelona zoo it is not a bad zoo. I agree with you at several points, yes. Here are my views in short, for the both zoos (Hellabrunn & Barcelona):

-Apes enclosure: For chimpanzee and for gorillas, it slightly better in Munich than in Barcelona. I don't liked the whole waterproof-floor, indoor enclosures, for many primates in Munich, without a natural substrate. However the outdoor orangutan enclosure in Hellabrunn was looking great. But Barcelona zoo's orangutan outdoor enclosure is nice too (there is a picture taken from me, for the zoo on Zoochat).

-I agree with you that many enclosures for monkeys in Barcelona are small, square and needs improving. But again, the indoor enclosures for drills in Munich were with waterproof floor in wholeness.

-The elephant and giraffe sections in Barcelona were not that small (there are pictures taken from me). Hippo and white rhinoceros enclosures yes, are small, and the hippo enclosure was a new one.

-Munich hoofed and elephant enclosures were quite bigger, yes.

-The Brazilian tapir enclosure in Barcelona, is comparable with the Malayan tapir enclosure in Hellabrunn. Both are nice and sizeable.

-Barcelona indoor aviaries for tropical birds were nicer than the big one in Munich, and Hellabrunn had a poorer collection of birds, compared to Barcelona zoo.

-Actually, when looking for opportunities for gorillas to explore, there is not many differences between the outdoor enclosures at the both zoos.

-The aquarium section in Hellabrun is nice, but it i almost non-existent in Barcelona, with a poor collection of seahorses and several other fish and aquatic invertebrates, and no sharks, stingrays or other interesting fish.

-The best things I liked at Hellabrunn was the ape complex.
-Venomous snakes are absent in Barcelona, which is a disadvantage, compared to Hellabrunn (and the terraria for the venomous snakes in Hellabrunn, in general were very nice and for the gaboon vipers quite spacious).

The aquarium section in Hellabrun is nice, but it i almost non-existent in Barcelona, with a poor collection of seahorses and several other fish and aquatic invertebrates, and no sharks, stingrays or other interesting fish.

-The best things I liked at Hellabrunn was the ape complex.
-Venomous snakes are absent in Barcelona, which is disadvantage, compared to Hellabrunn (and the terraria for the venomous snakes in Hellabrunn, in general were very nice and for the gaboon vipers quite spacious).

And some thoughts about Valencia bioparc:
-Yes the park is very eye-catching for visitors, but still enclosures were not bad as you described them, (in my opinion). They are not ideal (several of them). There was an enormous climbing tree or tree-like furniture in the chimp enclosure. The gorilla enclosures were big and two and moths were giving naturalistic look. Gorillas don't need a lot of climbing furniture (?)). The leopard enclosure is big and very nice, or the nicest I have ever seen for a leopard. There is not indoor viewing in Valencia (except for several animals), maybe due to the mild climate. I agree with you on the hyena enclosure. The bongo enclosure was relatively big, as well as that for the red buffalos, drills, lions, apes, leopards, and of course, savannah sections.

I will be happy to see better and better enclosures,

Of course the Hellabrunn zoo is economically more powerfull than the Barcelona zoo, having around 2 millions visitors anually (14 euro ticket?) and the later one, around 1 milion (20.0 euro ticket), and the German economy (3.4 trillion euros) is worth almost as three as that of Spain (1.2 trillions euros, and Australia is around 1.2 trillion euros) :) (and the German economy is big as many as 360 economies :p as that from R. Macedonia (9.5 billion euros)).

I needed an hour to write and to review this post :)
 
Last edited:
I don't liked the whole waterproof-floor, indoor enclosures, for many primates in Munich, without a natural substrate.
Said indoor enclosures are the relicts of the "Bathroom" zoo architecture epoch dating back to the 1970s/1980s when easy to clean surfaces (often tiles in drastic orange or green colours, i.e. the nominal bathroom moniker) were the norm in many zoos, due to contemporary hygiene protocols. The zoo tried its best to modernize the complex (which partly dates back to the 1930s), but the result, sometimes limited by preservation orders, doesn't always satisfy.
As for venomous snakes: originally, the species collection at Hellabrunn on that behalf was bigger than it's now.
 
And an orangutan drowned at Apenheul two years ago.

And a gibbon recently drowned in their island exhibit here in the States (don't remember where... some zoo in Florida, I think). While I understand that the apes normally avoid the water and so it's not usually an issue, it seems like a very hazardous way of displaying them.
 
Back
Top