Swiss Interlude Part Four - 7.4 on the Zurichter Scale
Warning: this probably isn't the review you want, but it might just be the review you need.
Zurich Zoo, July 4th 2017
This was my last day in Switzerland, and what a trip it had been. I've fallen in love with the country, despite the efforts of the shop owners, restauranteurs, and hosteliers, who seem to possess only three things: a price gun, a mean sense of humour and the kind of lack of moral compass that would make even the toothiest of loan sharks blush. Aside from the cost of living there, the natural scenery is spectacular, the cities and rural dwellings match it every step, and everything is clean and well organised. And things work, and people behave against their own self-interest in order to keep everything this way. That's worth more than the CHF80 we spent on fondue one night. Seriously.
Zurich Zoo is a little out of town but easily reached via the excellent tram system. I entered via the main entrance, not the Masoala one, and I strongly recommend this approach, for reasons that will become clear. I was very excited that morning, because there are very few zoos you can visit where you really suspect that you might be about to visit the best zoo you've ever been to in your life. It's an electric kind of feeling, and one I don't anticipate again this year.
I had kind of intended to head first to Masoala, expecting that it would need the most lingering time to spot everything, but due to the rather twisting nature of the paths within sections I got turned around several times almost immediately and ended up covering the entire top section (quickly google for a map) first, before finally turning my attention to the two marquee exhibits, the elephant house and the aforementioned huge tropical hall.
The logical entrance point to the maze of exhibits is the Exotarium, a combination of small primate, bird, herptile and aquatics house, with a smattering of other bits and pieces as well. It's absolutely fantastic, executed, as
@sooty mangabey would say, with real panache. The terrariums are gorgeous, although perhaps four blue tree monitor exhibits was too many. The bird species list was pleasing obscure, at least for me, and having free flying birds that could go anywhere but obviously chose the vegetated sections was a very nice touch. Worth mentioning as well that the King penguin indoor exhibit was cramped, as they always seem to be. Overall though, this is a great building, and one of the high points of Zurich. On a revisit I would spend much longer here, but first thing in a big zoo you need to set a reasonable pace, lest you run out of time.
From there I wandered through the nice but unremarkable wetland bird exhibit and found my way to the rather impressive Bactrian Camel and Yak paddock. This was very undulating, such that you couldn't see much of it from any one angle. Pleasingly they had leaned into the domestic nature of the species, making it clear on the signage, but also through the overall feel of the exhibit and the addition of a camp of what looked like yurts, but were probably something similar. Unfortunately these were closed on the day of my visit. The next time I am in Switzerland I will go to some lengths to visit Zurich on a Saturday, as there were various experiences I missed out on. Big shout out to
@antonmuster, without whom I wouldn't have even known what I was missing.
My path then led past wonderful views of Siberian tiger, although I suspect that the enclosure is much smaller than it looks. Incidentally, this may have been the first time I have seen a genuinely convincing naturalistic tiger enclosure, and I'm rather afraid that I liked it... Across the way is an exhibit for Mongolian wolf, and after a brief wait I was rewarded with a delightfully redder version of the animal we're all familiar with. The legendary snow leopard enclosure completes the set of large carnirvore exhibits, but at this point disaster struck my day as it was off-show due to maintainance, and, because of the immersive nature of the exhibit, that meant I didn't see any of it. This was a big blow as it's one of the enclosures that crops up again and again in discussion on ZooChat. I tried my hand at a little begging and flattery in my limited German, but to no avail. These incidents are in the nature of zoo visiting, but this will rank alongside the temporary closure of the South American house at Plzen in my book of collection-based ill-fortune.
Along the top of the zoo, I passed a row of aviaries for owls and the like before reaching a set of five hillside paddocks that contain a complete set of South American camelids. This was the first misstep of the zoo in my eyes. Now it doesn't help that these species do nothing for me, but I can't believe that the (below?) average visitor doesn't just see five paddocks of llamas. Following on from the snow leopards this area is crying out for some bharal, markhor or goral and then perhaps something else with a little less hoof.
Below the Alpacalypse© is the still under construction Australian zone. This looks like it'll be great, and I particularly enjoyed the, ahem, 'vigorous' nods to the Sydney Opera House which can be seen in what I assume will be the Koala House.
I deliberately misled you just now, dear reader, but I wish I hadn't. Between the guana-come-on-now-this-is-ridiculous and the Australian Zone is the Ape House. This is usually passed over in reviews with some hand-waving and mutters of 'disappointing', but in fact it deserves to be examined in more detail. There are four species: Sumatran Orangutan, Western Gorilla, Siamang and Pileated Gibbon. The Pileateds get a reasonable fist of things (although by no means approaching above average), but everything else is, by the standards of Europe, which Zurich should be exceeding, empirically bad. Let me clarify: I don't want to say that these animals are inadequately housed, because I probably shouldn't. But I can say that it is the smallest (by which I am not so subtly implying worst) gorilla enclosure I've see in Europe, the second smallest for orangs and the smallest for siamangs. They just stink ladies and gentlemen, and there's no way around it. Until they are replaced there will be a serious question mark over Zurich in my mind.
Fortunately, just before I arrived back at the entrance I took a sharp left into the Pantanal. This was stunning. A fairly typical array of South American mammals is thoughtfully displayed in gorgeous habitats. What had become routine and dull for this visitor was rendered fresh and enticing due to immersive presentation. A 'rangers hut' which should have been cringeworthy was instead an absolute triumph. This is Zurich at its best and it is magnificent.
I think that the famous Spectacled bear enclosure is technically not part of the Pantanal, but it is appropriately situated right next to it. Initially I was slightly underwhelmed. Sure, it's fantastic, but it didn't quite seem to live up to the hype. Then I started to walk around the exhibit and it just kept on going. Another fresh viewpoint, and another! It's huge and great and needs to be seen to be appreciated. It's so much more than one well-vegetated photo can convey (a series of several would be a decent approximation though!).
At this point I left the main body of the zoo and headed for the remaining exhibits in the lower part of the map (downhill and East for the geography fans). After passing under a bridge I was greeted by a large expansive hillside which was mostly empty, save for some diggers. This will eventually become the zoo's savannah waterhole exhibit, to hold rhino and giraffe and so on. My thoughts on that at the end. To the left is the Ethiopian Highlands Gelada/Hyrax exhibit, which is in itself is great, and very visually impressive, although the fake palms are such a lurid green that you feel someone somewhere is enjoying a good laugh. It was fantastic to see a hyrax bounding from rock to rock and then disappearing out of sight, rather than just perched high in the corner of the standard exhibit for the species. My struggle with this enclosure though, was that it was SO different in every way from its surroundings. It didn't feel at all rooted in its location, which I think is a big distraction from the attempted effect.
Continuing down the hill I approached the Elephant House. Although it's new this is real vintage Zurich. Architecturally superb, full of surprises for the visitors and animals, it's another tour de force, and I was delighted than my time at the enclosure coincided with the presentation and feed. I didn't get to see the elephants inside, which is a pity because it's really big and it would have been good to get a true sense of scale. The outside, though crammed full of enrichment and feeding points, is curiously small, and it will be interesting to see what the long term verdict on this exhibit is.
Lastly then, I arrived at Masoala. Although I've spent quite a bit of time in actual rainforest now, this was to be my first of the 'big three' rainforest halls in Europe: Masoala, Burger's Bush and Gondwanaland. I didn't really know what to expect. I don't know if I can do my experience justice, but I'll try. In case anyone is unaware, Masoala is a essentially a huge greenhouse with a small section of rainforest growing inside. It is tightly themed on Masoala National Park in Madagascar. It attempts to recreate the ecosystem, with the idea being that the animals live as close to natural lives as possible whilst visitors walk amongst them.
I wouldn't say that as soon as you emerge from the tunnel you are blown away by Masoala. Rather, it is like a gentle breeze that plays across your face. But as you walk deeper into the forest the wind picks up, and you are carried away. You may not forget you are in a zoo, but it becomes meaningless to think of this as an exhibit. This is a Habitat, and it might be the first authentic one you've experienced in your life. The wind blows stronger as you notice more and more species, on all levels of the forest. When you see your first lemurs leaping through the bamboo towards you you feel the first harsh drops of rain on your face. You spend hours wandering the path, looking for the species you know are there, but understanding that realistically you don't have a hope of seeing them all. Finally, you return to the entrance to climb the staircase to the canopy walkway, and when you emerge into the stifling air above the treetops you are hit with the full force of the hurricane, because you hadn't realised how big it all was and how high, how could you have done? You stand there for a long moment, soaking in the sheer beauty of this incredible creation, and it IS a creation. It's only from this vantage point that you can really see the enormous roof structure, arcing high above trees that themselves tower over their surroundings. Beneath them is not a recreation of a rainforest, it IS a rainforest, and it's teeming with life. At that moment you know that this is peak zoo, at least for you, right here, right now. Nothing has ever come close to this before.
It's something like that
I spent two hours in there, and if it hadn't been so hot on the canopy walkway (heat rises, but unlike the real forest it is then trapped under the roof) I could easily have spent another hour up there. I didn't see plenty of species, including the red-fronted lemurs, but the real star is the forest itself, not the species in it. Masoala is the best thing I have ever seen in a zoo, by a long way. I'm quite happy to say it's the best thing in any zoo, even though I don't have enough zoos under my belt for that. Having (virtually) no enclosures inside is a masterstroke, and I strongly suspect would lead me to prefer it to Burger's Bush and Gondwanaland, had I seen those two. It cost CHF 52,000,000 and is worth every rappen.
As I was finally leaving the hall a bird hopped on to the path in front of me. It was the Pitta-like ground-roller, hitherto unseen, in the only place in Europe where it is on show. It was the perfect way to end my visit to the zoo.
I have one final point to make, that didn't quite fit into any other section, but is still totally necessary. Zurich's paths are all wide and, to the untrained foot, easily accessible. Branching off them quite frequently however, are little trails that disappear into the undergrowth only to emerge in unexpected places on the same or different paths. These are generally just dirt paths, with log steps or similar. They add a whole other layer of complexity to the zoo, without causing those who can't access them to miss out on anything significant. They are fantastic and really characterise the feel of Zurich. The most memorable one led to a little hut near the Elephant House, which had been partially destroyed by, one assumes, elephants. It was a wonderful piece of interpretation.
Zurich is a zoo with some of the best exhibitry I've ever seen. But, there's something amiss. It somehow doesn't feel complete. There are three easily identifiable reasons for this. Firstly, the gap between the good and the bad is so vast that the bad doesn't really feel like part of the zoo. The Ape House might as well not be there. Secondly, in the lower half of the zoo the three exhibits are spaced out with empty walking between them. Geographically it just feels too loose. Thirdly, there are some really large gaps in the collection. It's strange that such a respected zoo has no giraffes, rhinos or hippos. Those species aren't particularly why I visit zoos, but I sure do miss them when they're absent.
I think Zurich is a victim of its own success. It's raised the bar so high in some areas that the rest of the zoo has been left behind and it needs time to catch up with itself. The new savannah exhibit that will open in 2020 will really help to round out both the collection and the lower half of the zoo, but the one to watch is the African Forest complex that will follow it. That will be the development that draws me back to Zurich and it could be the development that finally allows me to unequivocally name one zoo that stands above all others.