Yes there are at least 3 navy dolphins active in the vaquita programa now according to reports. It is likely that new population estmates of vaquitas have used the navy dolphins.
That would be a real asset I believe.
Estimado Carlos, I realize the issues are complex in fisheries' in general and that there is a human element in local livelihoods involved. Alas, there is no denying that overfishing, the type of netting used (gill netting) and the large trawling ship industry are the main drivers' behind depletion of marine resources, fish stocks as well as cetecean and manatee numbers globally. Some, if not most are at play in the Mexican Gulf region too.
I quote directly from the most recent IUCN Red List listing for vaquita Phocoena sinus:
QUOTE:
"Given what is known about fishing history in the northern Gulf of California and the vaquita's vulnerability to entanglement in gillnets, it is reasonable to assume that the porpoise population has been declining since the 1940s when gillnet fisheries became widespread in the region. The best estimate of total population size is from 1997: 567 (95% CI: 177, 1,073) (Jaramillo-Legorreta
et al. 1999). The estimated annual level of mortality in the early 1990s for one of the three main fishing communities, based on reports from onboard observers (Method 1) and those observer reports combined with information from interviews with fishermen (Method 2), was 84 (95% CI: 14, 155) (Method 1) or 39 (95% CI: 14, 93) (Method 2) (Rojas-Bracho and Taylor 1999, D'Agrosa
et al. 2000). Using the 1997 abundance estimate, the range of bycatch estimates for a single community in the early 1990s, and plausible potential rates of population increase for phocoenids, Rojas-Bracho and Taylor (1999) estimated that the vaquita population was declining rapidly, possibly by as much as 15% per year. Using the lower of their plausible decline rates (0.05), the population size would be reduced by more than 80% over three generations (i.e., 30 years), including both the past and the future (Rojas-Bracho and Taylor 1999). The cause of the reduction (incidental mortality in fisheries) has not ceased and may even have increased over the last 10 years based on fishing effort (ca. 1,000 gillnet boats might operate in vaquita habitat each year; Rojas-Bracho
et al. 2006)."
UNQOUTE
LINK:
Phocoena sinus (Cochito, Gulf Of California Harbour Porpoise, Gulf Of California Porpoise, Gulf Porpoise, Vaquita)
These above facts should be a sobering thought ..., even to local communities dependent on fisheries'. In fact, they constitute a direct insult to injury as to what mankind and specifically the fishing communities' within the Gulf have promoted over the last few decades for the species (let alone what it has meant for marine resources and commercial fish stocks in general).
All in all, not a good record to be proud of by any account.