Proposal to send some Philippine eagle abroad :
Philippines mull sending eagles abroad to ensure species survival
Philippines mull sending eagles abroad to ensure species survival
you've misread the article. It is saying there is a world population of 400 birds, not 400 birds captive in the facility.They have 400 captive eagles in one facility and they haven’t sent any of them elsewhere yet? I’m glad they’re finally mulling it over now, but avian flu outbreaks are not a new phenomenon... nor are any number of other natural disasters that could singlehandedly level that whole aviary.
you've misread the article. It is saying there is a world population of 400 birds, not 400 birds captive in the facility.
The captive facility seems to have about 35 or 40 birds. Someone else may have an actual figure.
I hope former keepers Zoo Antwerp will receive a couple. A zoo in the Netherlands would be perfect, but Antwerp a relativly easy to travel.
It will always be Monkey-eating Eagle to me as well, although I understand the reasoning behind the change which was to instill a sense of national pride in the bird (it was made the National Bird in 1995) and to try and get the local populace behind protecting it and its habitat. Supposedly they mainly feed on Colugos as well, and the name "monkey-eating" was reportedly seen as derogatory and therefore disruptive to the "national pride" angle.It is about thirty years since I last saw a monkey-eating eagle; I’ll never get used to calling the species Philippine eagle.
I was also tending towards those zoos and facilities with a good track record in birds of prey husbandry and captive-breeding. So, your choices are spot on there.Great news, Philippine Eagle is low density species and will realistically never recover in the wild much above the current population of low 100s. The species will always need a large zoo population to be safe.
Singapore, International Centre of Birds of Prey, Tierpark Berlin, Sand Diego WAP or some zoos in California or Florida would be good. All have good experience with breeding exotic raptors and international cooperation. I would not put eagles into any zoos which only have tropical climate but lack resources and experience.
Yes, I am aware of the reasoning behind the change of name but I regularly saw the species labelled as monkey-eating eagle at London Zoo, as child in the 1960s, so still think of that as the name.It will always be Monkey-eating Eagle to me as well, although I understand the reasoning behind the change which was to instill a sense of national pride in the bird (it was made the National Bird in 1995) and to try and get the local populace behind protecting it and its habitat. Supposedly they mainly feed on Colugos as well, and the name "monkey-eating" was reportedly seen as derogatory and therefore disruptive to the "national pride" angle.
Great news, Philippine Eagle is low density species and will realistically never recover in the wild much above the current population of low 100s. The species will always need a large zoo population to be safe.
Singapore, International Centre of Birds of Prey, Tierpark Berlin, Sand Diego WAP or some zoos in California or Florida would be good. All have good experience with breeding exotic raptors and international cooperation. I would not put eagles into any zoos which only have tropical climate but lack resources and experience.
This hardly seems like 'great news'?
Maybe for zoochatters but certainly not the species itself!
Does anyone know if this ever progressed?