@sooty mangabey Are we going to hear your views on this recent visit or do we have to wait until Spring and the new ZooGrapevine magazine?
Also I know this isn't your first visit but since it's gone critical what is your opinion now compared to your last visit? I know you weren't to enamoured with the theming but since the collection has grown can you look past it?
Sorry for all the questions, just intrigued to know what you think.
I think it's been covered quite extensively in Grapevine / IZN, so I don't think the editor would especially welcome another piece on it!
So, here, briefly: I think it's a fantastic zoo. It's not how I would develop a zoo if I were spending many millions of euros doing so, but to criticise it for not being the sort of backward-looking, taxonomic collection I would favour would be somewhat unfair, possibly! And given what they are doing, they've done it very well (far, far better than Hannover, for example, I think). It largely lacks the tackiness of some other heavily-themed zoos (some very dodgy evocations of Africa and a desire to squeeze a temple into every free space aside) - although parts of it are, frankly, bonkers (such as the collection of precious stones which are displayed alongside the pandas, for example).
I was very impressed by some of the new developments: the Gorilla Volcano is a bit odd, but to have two spacious indoor areas is excellent; the two orang spaces look very good. Nearly 20 elephants, in various groups? Excellent! The Chinese area? Really very attractive. Asian Black Bears? Lots of space, which is good, but until I saw the bears I did think the exhibit was for deer.
The African area which was newly opened when I last visited in 2012 has bedded down quite nicely, with the dreadful leopard enclosure no longer used for its original purpose (it is currently housing Clouded Leopards on a temporary basis).
The Oasis Tropical House is a bit unsatisfying - a combination of animal house, playground and restaurant, which doesn't really work as any of these (having tables for eating on in a house where there are free-flying birds doesn't seem like such a good idea).
There's just about enough quirkiness there, still (some of the species discussed above), but the place as a whole is possibly moving towards being a brilliant ABC zoo, rather than the esoteric bird garden I first visited in the 1990s.
In summary: if I could, I'd go back tomorrow, and the next day (and I'm sure I wouldn't be bored). I think it's one of the major European zoos. On a personal level, I definitely prefer Antwerp, and possibly prefer Planckendael, but I suspect that many would see things differently. And anywhere that has a collection of this size, displayed with this much flamboyance, has to be worth seeing!