But I was just getting used to the current taxo!
I refuse to give any credence to something that takes my Royal Bengal Tiger from me!
What about P. p. capensis? The individual in this photograph would be that subspecies: African leopard, Sita | ZooChatAfrican Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)
This subspecies is proposed to cover all populations within Africa, and encompasses the following formerly-recognised subspecies:
P. p. panthera
P. p. pardus
P. p. leopardus
P. p. melanotica - photograph by @Maguari
![]()
P. p. suahelicus
P. p. nanopardus
P. p. ruwenzorii
P. p. chui
P. p. reichenowi
P. p. antinorii
P. p. iturensis
P. p. adusta
P. p. shortridgei
P. p. adersi
Royal Bengal has gone down the plugholeI refuse to give any credence to something that takes my Royal Bengal Tiger from me!
What about P. p. capensis? The individual in this photograph would be that subspecies: African leopard, Sita | ZooChat
I think the tiger updates needs another reviewI also think Leopard ssp need to be reworked.
Most certainlyI find it hard to believe that the Amur Tiger and Indochinese Tiger are the same thing when the Sumatran Tiger - classified as distinct - looks a lot like the latter and nothing like the former!
As for leopards, I presume your thinking is either that the African population is over-lumped or the Asian is over-split, or even both?
What about P. p. capensis? The individual in this photograph would be that subspecies: African leopard, Sita | ZooChat
To the best of my knowledge, even the traditional list of African subspecies didn't include a taxon of that name. Is that individual of proven wild origin - and if so, from where?
Err... yes I meant melanotica. Not sure where I pulled capensis fromThis is/was a P. p. melanotica (is she still alive?
I like this photo...Kodkod (Leopardus guigna)
This is one of only two cat species which I *know* a Zoochatter has seen - in this case, unsurprisingly, it was @devilfish - but which has not been photographed.
The animal doesn't look very healthy though.