I found out recently about Black-throated Magpie-Jays in California.
Not if they keep getting poached!I can't remember who first mentioned them, but I think the Chestnut-fronted Macaws in Florida are gone. However, Blue-and-yellow Macaws seem well-established.
I can't remember who first mentioned them, but I think the Chestnut-fronted Macaws in Florida are gone. However, Blue-and-yellow Macaws seem well-established.
I found out recently about Black-throated Magpie-Jays in California.
I think that the Black-throated Magpie-jay was included in the second edition of the Sibley Guide to Birds (2014). For some reason, that guide doesn't include the much better-known Pin-tailed Whydah.Yes, though I guess they move back and forth across the border. No field guide mentions them, oddly enough.
I think that the Black-throated Magpie-jay was included in the second edition of the Sibley Guide to Birds (2014). For some reason, that guide doesn't include the much better-known Pin-tailed Whydah.
While researching today I found what will most likely be the most shocking and out of no where discovery on this page and although it is not confirmed many people believe this including one of my family members who saw one almost 30 years ago. There have been reports of these animals from the 90’s all the way to recent 2017 and possibly more sightings.
This unconfirmed population is usually sighted in The mountainous areas of central Victoria (Australia) but sometimes in NSW too. The animal I am talking about is large and secretive and in its melanistic form.
I’m talking about the puma.
If you don’t believe me I will post links of articles of this some old and some recent. Including one with a photo.
Yet according to my research there may be a small, and secretive population of wild pumas in Australia.
Sibley is the best North American field guide, IMO. It is especially nice because it includes species not on the ABA checklist.Interesting. I'm more familiar with Nat Geo's excellent ones and the Peterson guides.
I've seen them.Monk Parakeets in Chicago
Monk Parakeet | Chicago Botanic Garden
Sibley is the best North American field guide, IMO. It is especially nice because it includes species not on the ABA checklist.
The biggest problem with North American field guides (all of them) is a lack of info on escaped domestic waterfowl. Sibley has more info on this than any other field guide, and still only devotes half a page to domestic Anser species.I agree that is a shortcoming of many of them. Although in many cases I imagine it's difficult to judge whether an escaped species is established enough or gets out often enough to be worth including.
The biggest problem with North American field guides (all of them) is a lack of info on escaped domestic waterfowl. Sibley has more info on this than any other field guide, and still only devotes half a page to domestic Anser species.
No different than a page on Feral Pigeons! I think one could easily cover the domestic Anser species in three pages: one showing variations of A. a. domesticus, one showing variations of A. c. domesticus, and one showing variations of hybrids. Domestic Ducks (Mallard and Muscovy) could be lumped into pages showing the wild form, as well.I think part of the problem there is how many domestic color forms/ physical forms there are. Trying to add all of them would take a large section! Let alone hybrids...
No different than a page on Feral Pigeons! I think one could easily cover the domestic Anser species in three pages: one showing variations of A. a. domesticus, one showing variations of A. c. domesticus, and one showing variations of hybrids. Domestic Ducks (Mallard and Muscovy) could be lumped into pages showing the wild form, as well.
The wild type is rare enough in captivity that it is probably not worth putting in the field guide. Mandarin should be in field guides, IMO (I know Natural geographic and Sibley both cover it).Are we including the Swan Goose as a domestic? Having seen domestic-type and wild type, I would say large difference. Also what about Mandarin Duck?