Less than 3,000 Tigers documented in America

Jurek7

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Feline Conservation Federation Census Documents Less than 3,000 Tigers in America

The Feline Conservation Federation used the Freedom of Information Act to gain USDA and state wildlife agency inventories of all wild cats
Contrary to the wild guesses of five to ten thousand tigers in the U.S.,a nation-wide survey of tigers and tiger habitat, conducted by the FCF, has revealed less than 3,000 tigers live in America.

"We have suspected this for a long time, but now we know for a fact that the pitiful, dwindling number of tigers living in nature exceeds those protected in state and federally licensed animal facilities in the US", says Lynn Culver, executive director for the Feline Conservation Federation (FCF).

“The FCF survey also proved the so-called “pet tiger” in your neighbor’s back yard, is an overblown urban legend. The majority of tigers live in licensed exhibits such as zoos, nature centers, and sanctuaries.”
In 2011 the Feline Conservation Federation used the Freedom of Information Act to gain USDA and state wildlife agency inventories of all wild cats. The project also worked to identify non-exhibiting sanctuaries, and non-licensed wild feline owners

The FCF census has documented 2,884 tigers, which is less than the estimated number of tigers in nature. The FCF census revealed that the licensed tiger habitat in America consists of 468 facilities. Of these facilities, at least 226 have been identified by the FCF as USDA Class C exhibitors that operate city, county, or private zoological parks. These facilities hold at least 809 tigers, including the nearly 400 tigers maintained in AZA member zoos. Another 91 sanctuaries hold 1,544 tigers. At least 22 educational facilities provide habitat for 68 tigers. The remaining 585 tigers held by 129 USDA or state licensed entities, reside in commercial breeding facilities, nature centers, are owned by small exhibitors, are owned by individuals, or are part of retired commercial operations, or are school or university mascots, are used in circus, stage, and other traveling exhibits, or could be tigers in zoos and sanctuaries not identified by the FCF.

Speculation by animal rights organizations that the state of Texas holds more tigers than the country of India has been proven completely false by the Feline Conservation Federation census. “Actually only about 300 tigers live in Texas, and most are in zoos or sanctuaries,” says Ms. Culver.
In 1998 the Fish and Wildlife Service enacted the Generic Tiger Rule, legalizing interstate commerce of mixed sub-species and non-pedigreed tigers. This exemption allowed tiger breeders to purchase unrelated bloodlines, which improved the health and genetic diversity of tigers. Ms. Culver says the benefits of the CBW exemption are "right before our eyes", noting that decades of out crossing have created perfect white tigers, a public favorite at zoological parks and in animal shows.

The World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, have pressured the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to rescind the Captive Bred Wildlife registration exemption for generic tigers. A 2008 report by TRAFFIC titled “Paper Tigers,” examined whether U.S. tigers were involved in the illegal trade in tiger parts and could not find any evidence. TRAFFIC did however, speculate that U.S. captive tigers could potentially, someday, enter the body parts black market, and fuel the demand and cause an increase in poaching in range

Feline Conservation Federation Census Documents Less than 3,000 Tigers in America
 
I don't know anything about the Feline Conservation Federation, but this survey sounds rather bogus and in no way "proves" that the pet tiger problem is a "myth". It's not like people with illegal tigers are going to be jumping up and down wanting to take part in a survey!

I just looked up the FCF website (Welcome to the world of feline captive husbandry and conservation) and I'm not sure what to think of the group. They are working with Jim Sanderson, a respected wild cat researcher and conservationist, but the group seems to be primarily a lobbying and support group for captive breeding of cats rather than a group dedicated to conservation of the species in the wild.

@Arizona Docent: do you think that the data in the survey can be trusted? Is the FCF a respectable conservation group?
 
I am a member of FCF as well as a personal friend of Jim Sanderson and yes I think the survey can be trusted. In an article (I forget if it was in their magazine or online), they gave a specific example where they directly spoke to a Texas humane officer (I think in Houston). This person had been quoted by the animal rights extremists as having so many tigers rescued by their departement - I forget the number quoted - but I know it was over a hundred. When the FCF asked the person how many they had seen over the years, it was actually three (two together recently and one years earlier).
 
I am a member of FCF as well as a personal friend of Jim Sanderson and yes I think the survey can be trusted. In an article (I forget if it was in their magazine or online), they gave a specific example where they directly spoke to a Texas humane officer (I think in Houston). This person had been quoted by the animal rights extremists as having so many tigers rescued by their departement - I forget the number quoted - but I know it was over a hundred. When the FCF asked the person how many they had seen over the years, it was actually three (two together recently and one years earlier).

I do trust your opinion on whether this is reliable information. If people really want to have captive tiger populations that authentically represent the range of genetic diversity in nature then it sounds like the "generic" tiger gene pool maybe should be phased out, and all of these accredited facilities that the survey mentions (zoos and reputable private facilities) need to start planning and actually working on getting healthy breeding gene pools to represent each of the remaining subspecies. They're also going to need hundreds of world-class tiger exhibits to keep them in. Hopefully the work on this is all under way.
 
@Jurek7: Thanks for posting the information, and I have long suspected that the number of tigers to be found in America was vastly overblown in the press. I believe that over the years many aging circus cats have died of old age, there has been a gradual crackdown on "backyard tigers" and there are far less roadside menageries than ever before. What should be of more concern is the sheer volume of captive tigers in Asian zoos, as some minor establishments can occasionally have at least 15 or more tigers! I have non-ZooChatter friends that have seen over 20 tigers in obscure wildlife parks in Malaysia and Thailand. For example, Saleng Zoo had 32 tigers confiscated earlier this year:

32 tigers rescued from Malaysia zoo | News24
 
I'm not quite sure if we're expected to be shocked that there are only 3,000 tigers in the USA. This still compares very favourably to the numbers of wild tigers in Asia and as few, if any, captive tigers will be returned to the wild, there seem to be too many captive tigers in the world, with only Indo-Chinese and Malayan tigers really needing any extra assistance in raising numbers in captivity.

I agree with David Brown about phasing out the generic pool, although I also understand Colin Tudge's claim that 'a tiger is a tiger is a tiger'. I don't think there are that many people who are bothered about the subspecies of a captive tiger and I sometimes think some people can be a bit snobby about white tigers. Many visitors do find them attractive and as most tigers are kept in zoos to make money, rather than for conservation, does it really matter? I must disagree about the value of hundreds of world-class tiger exhibits. The tiger is safe from extinction, although I supect it will die out in the wild in the next few decades. Personally, I'd prefer to see kodkods, flat-headed cats, Andean mountain cats, Chinese desert cats, Iriomote cats, marbled cats and Bornean bay cats, but I can't see a big demand from the public, even though aseveral of these cats are endangered and without a captive breeding pool, they could become extinct altogether.
 
I see that situation with tigers resembles one with smaller exotic pets.

To sum up, my quick thoughts:

Historically AZA ignored the existence of ca 2400 (6 times more) captive tigers outside AZA. For practical reasons, these tigers will stay. Even if hypothetical law would ban captive keeping of tigers, what would happen to existing ones - euthanize 2400 tigers? White tiger mutants will stay, whether we like it or not.

Important is that there is a big variety of keepers and conditions. Spotlight goes often on very poor conditions, and indeed some tigers live in very bad conditions. However some non-AZA tigers live in better conditions than some AZA-accredited zoos.

AZA has things which non-AZA keepers may want. It has the best expertise in tiger husbandry and the biggest single gene pool of captive tigers. Non-AZA keepers also have things AZA may want. One is space and resources. One fifth of non-AZA tigers would increase managed captive population by 150% to 1000, providing space for keeping 200 individuals of each of the five tiger subspecies. Non-AZA keepers have potential for education and raising conservation funding, rather than mindless shows.

One possible outcome would be AZA identifying and cooperating with most dedicated non-AZA tiger keepers. This could be eg. a form of binding agreements, non-AZA keepers bringing their individual animals to AZA pool in exchange for expertise and help. This would require flexibility from AZA, which traditionally mostly ignored the whole matter.

Another should be stamping out and improving the opposite end of the tiger pool. Laws about minimum level of husbandry and safety, prohibiting things like declawing for example. Also, educating tiger keepers and watching out for situations, where a circus or private individual goes bankrupt and tigers are dumped in substandard conditions.
 
Another should be stamping out and improving the opposite end of the tiger pool. Laws about minimum level of husbandry and safety, prohibiting things like declawing for example. Also, educating tiger keepers and watching out for situations, where a circus or private individual goes bankrupt and tigers are dumped in substandard conditions.
I seem to recall that a few years ago the USDA did outlaw declawing of wild cats in the United States? (I don't have a source for this handy, just something that stuck in my mind).
 
I seem to recall that a few years ago the USDA did outlaw declawing of wild cats in the United States? (I don't have a source for this handy, just something that stuck in my mind).

They quite possibly did - you're replying to a post from 8 years ago :P
 
Back
Top