And now, before I retire for the night, a pair of questions for those backing Taronga 
Yes, Taronga does have a significantly larger collection of Australian species than does Chester.... but:
a) How does the range and depth of the collection in other aspects of the "Islands" theme compare to that found at Chester?
b) How does the exhibit standards and quality compare to that found at Chester?
Yes, Taronga does have a significantly larger collection of Australian species than does Chester.... but:
a) How does the range and depth of the collection in other aspects of the "Islands" theme compare to that found at Chester?
b) How does the exhibit standards and quality compare to that found at Chester?
