Well then, after visiting Pairi Daiza for the third time last weekend, today my first ever visit to Beauval.
Both zoos rely heavily on the “if you build it, they will come” principle. This means that both zoos are situated near small towns in a rural setting and rely heavily on big ticket investments to draw the crowds. This is part of the charm, but also part of the dirty feeling they leave you with after your visit.
First of all, “they will come” is not a joke. Where Pairi Daiza’s Corona measures were a joke (1,5 meters was not possible in over 50% of the park), Beauval took this to a whole different level. The whole zoo seemed to be 1 big cue. Normally, a busy zoo annoys me but in a country with big Corona problems, Beauval isn’t afraid to not be part of the solution. Just plain odd.
The zoo itself is impressive enough though. It still has it’s old core, with some decent or well done enclosures like the gorilla islands, monkey islands and the african savannah exhibit.
The first expansions to the south include a few gems like the massive asian plains exhibit, the takin yard, the okapi’s and the impressive elephant exhibit (although not as large as I thought).
The second expansion to the north includes the overly impressive hippo exhibit, the new lion exhibit and the new, huge dome.
It’s unfair to judge Beauval right after Pairi Daiza, because both focus on the same strenghts. But I have no choice. What Beauval does better, is create new exhibits that really seem build for the animals. What Beauval does worse is leave old, bad exhibits intact while building new ones. I thought we were past parrot rows, but apparantly Beauval is not. And many of the old cat and monkey cages are also past their due date (about 2 decades).
Building new exhibits also leaves you with duplicates (meerkats, several reptiles), odd designs (that’s one hell of a fence for giant anteaters) and empty enclosures (old manatee pool, old hanuman langur cage).
The massive dome has some mirroring glass issues, but the manatee under water viewing area was impressive. The dome itself has 1 logical route that really pushed you past all the laid-out exhibits. As a child growing up with Burgers Bush, that always irks me a little. But it was impressive nonetheless.
The hippo exhibit was out of this world though. Massively impressive, almost to a point where you’d wish they’d saved some money to clear up some of the old zoo. But very cool nonetheless.
Last but not least, the bird show. Hailed by many to be the best of it’s kind. It was spectacular, in the insane amount of species and numbers on show. It lacked for me the educational aspect and the intimate aspect of Walsrode, so it ended second on my list of best birdshows i’ve seen.
I still have to answer my “if you build it, they will come” remark. The zoo breathes “moneyyyy”. Take a rural setting, through some millions in, draw crowds. It would work anywhere. These kinds of zoos are impressive, you want to see them, but they lack any atmosphere... you almost feel a bit dirty coming out of them,
Hard to rank this zoo. Of the 80-odd I’ve seen, somewhere between 5 and 10 I think.
Any questions, just shoot.