That sounds really good! Having enough behind the scenes (breeding) enclosures is very important for such a stress sensitive species.
Indeed, and also a way to see what the differences in behaviour are with different types of viewing
That sounds really good! Having enough behind the scenes (breeding) enclosures is very important for such a stress sensitive species.
I might have missed it somewhere, but what is the purpose of the jeep in the bongo/potto enclosure?
In general I would start adding animal housing/care areas. Right now you only have the exhibits but in the ned those care areas will need to be there so it is best to add them now. I know I brought this up earlier but it is still very important
Same. Separation cages, keeper paths, keeper rooms... I'd advise you to have a look at this sketch of me for example: As you can see, there are several keeper pathways, rooms to breed/raise animals, place for an incubator, storage spaces, holding facilities, .... And it's not even that complete as I forgot to include sinks, central-heating control panels, garbage bins etc..In general I would start adding animal housing/care areas. Right now you only have the exhibits but in the ned those care areas will need to be there so it is best to add them now. I know I brought this up earlier but it is still very important
Aardvark: a separation enclosure is extremely useful for breeding, and some facility is also needed to hand-raise young just in case. You can clean the enclosure without troubles with the animals in it so you don't need to be able to lock out the animals from the main enclosure during cleaning.
It's a nice layout but the whole area feels cramped. Almost every piece of land has an exhibit on it so I would get rid of a few species to loosen up the entire area. When you pack exhibits like this you lose space for plants and rocks to bring the atmosphere into the area.

A walkthrough koala enclosure is a horrible idea for several reasons. First is that they have very sharp claws, second they are very prone to stress from screaming people and third disease transfer is a huge liability with people so close to them (giving medicine to koalas is almost impossible, so illness often means death). I'd rather advise to do it the Pairi Daiza (no barrier but continuous security) or Planckendael (soundproof glass) way.

Is it just me or do the two "large" macropod enclosures and the dingo enclosure seem rather small for so many species.
The first two are larger then I though, no problem there with that size. But a dingo enclosure smaller or even equal to the peccary enclosure is pretty small.Well, if you compare it to other enclosures on the big map, the outback enclosure is as big as the Rimba bangteng / muntjac enclosure. The Eastern forest enclosure is at least three times as big as the current swamp wallaby / black swan enclosure, and only the grey kangaroos will be added, no new swamp wallabies will be added.
The dingo enclosure is only a little smaller than the peccary enclosure in the desert
I'd advise to have the trees and overhanging branches far enough away from the visitors in that case. At least 2,5 meters I'd estimate to be a decent distance based on Pairi Daiza's enclosure. Further a person would probably need to be stationed there continuously to keep people quiet.Actually, I was planning to make it as a sort of walkover enclosure. With a low pathway so that the animals and the guests can't actually get on the same path.There will be a few points (maybe two or three) where the koalas can actually climb over the path, they can also just walk under of course. The path poles will be protected with mesh or metal poles
View attachment 467627
I'd advise to have the trees and overhanging branches far enough away from the visitors in that case. At least 2,5 meters I'd estimate to be a decent distance based on Pairi Daiza's enclosure. Further a person would probably need to be stationed there continuously to keep people quiet.