How To Combat An Increasing Homogenization Amongst Zoo Collections?

I somewhat agree zoos are getting watered down especially the larger zoos like the Bronx and San Diego Zoos that normal people actually travel to see. I would suggest SSP's become more concentrated in certain areas, for example, the main Nubian Ibex herds would be in one general area that would include San Diego Zoo, Living Desert, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara (this is just an example so don't come at me saying this specific distribution wouldn't work). This would mean that instead of rarer species only going to larger zoos some smaller zoos can get species by joining nearby SSPs. And zoos can still hold animals from these SSPs outside of the designated areas they just won't be breeding or would include specifically exhibit species not specifically breeding species.
 
Homogenisation of species has plagued the main Australian zoos for at least the past decade - and has become a growing trend in New Zealand zoos.

From a population management perspective, I will play devil’s advocate and suggest that in the short term, it’s a positive thing. When multiple zoos hold the same species, a greater genetic diversity can potentially be held (especially if there’s the potential for wild born founders to enter the population). Not every zoo can breed, so some hold bachelor herds etc.

The reason I say it’s a positive thing in the short term, is Australasian zoos have a habit of acquiring a species because it’s the new ‘must have’ and then phasing it out on a whim for the next ‘must have.’
 
What I meant before is that zoos in Czechia and Poland show that it is possible to avoid homogenization.
 
This is very concerning as these are under-appreciated species and some of them are amongst the world's most endangered. If we want people to care about saving all animals, they need to have exposure to all animals- which includes having all AZA facilities manage at least a couple of hoofstock species.
Chicken and egg thing. Zoos phase out animals that their visitors have no interest in. Raise public interest and zoos will fill the need. Or fill the zoos with animals the public considers boring and zoos will whither away.
Times have changed and looking back to San Diego Zoo in the 1970s or Bronx in the 1920s is pointless for gaining new ideas.
 
Chicken and egg thing. Zoos phase out animals that their visitors have no interest in. Raise public interest and zoos will fill the need. Or fill the zoos with animals the public considers boring and zoos will whither away.
Times have changed and looking back to San Diego Zoo in the 1970s or Bronx in the 1920s is pointless for gaining new ideas.
So maybe the question we should be asking is how do we raise public interest in underappreciated species?
 
The exotic rarities are not sustainable even if they are a breeding population. Most of them are primates so their genetic diversity cannot be helped due to biosecurity laws. I also wouldn't count the rare reptiles because I recall iZoo having basically a monopoly on them rather than cooperating with JAZA zoos to help populate the species.

Importation of primates, hoof stock, rabies vectors, farm birds and relatives is restricted enough to almost stop zoos from importing new species. For example, as of now primates can only be imported from 7 countries (USA, China, Indonesia, Philippines, Guyana, Vietnam, and Suriname) and nowhere else. And from those countries a notification to the quarantine services has to be made 40-70 days before the animal is imported followed by a 30 day quarantine which does sound like a lot of bureaucracy for a lot of zoos to deal with. The only way I see a foreign primate being added to a Japanese collection is if the animal is found and confiscated in customs.

I don't know about how tough CITES is enforced in Japan since there were loopholes exploited by loris smugglers, but it does seem to be discouraging zoos from replacing animals not covered by the biosecurity laws such as maned wolf and ocelot. The only exception I know for this is the cheetahs imported to Chiba from Europe along with Asian elaphants that are obtained through sister city relationships.

Even if there are brokers and companies that are able to bring in rare animals such as tayras, ratels, and sand cat, those animals get snagged by questionable breeding mills before any JAZA zoo shows interest in those animals (assuming that they are interested).

There's also the invasive species laws which add extra bureaucracy for zoos that want to display animals that are listed as invasive or potentially invasive (listed animals include every animal under the genuses Macaca and Cervus go good luck conserving endangered macaques and deer).

Native animals are cool and all but native endangered species aren't as easy to obtain to my knowledge which is why most endangered species aren't kept in more than 5 zoos. I don't think they compensate the loss of "rarities" that easily, but that's just me. And there's also the average visitor who would rather see the ABCs rather than endemic fruit bats.

This results a considerably sad (or at least sad in my opinion) picture in a first world country that has a lot of zoos. Animals commonly kept in the west such as sloth bear, maned wolf, and gemsbok are gone for good. Most remaining animals such as addax, sulawesi macaque, and gorilla have a considerably unsustainable population.


The situation in America, as much as I want to rant about it, is clearly much more better than what Japanese zoos face. But then again I am not Japanese nor have I been in Japan long enough, so someone from Japan such as @FrancoiseLangur might know the great picture better than me.

Japanese aquariums in the other hand don't seem to face the fate Japanese zoos do.

This is a really interesting comment and you make some very pertinent points.

I would say that from my own personal perspective it seems that Japanese zoos are far more interested in displaying these exotic species to the public rather than creating self sustaining captive breeding programes.

Moreover, if I'm really honest about it I am not so worried that these populations of exotic animals are in the long term not sustainable in Japanese zoos.

I am actually far more concerned about the viability of the captive breeding programes for endangered and endemic Japanese species within zoos over there.
 
Last edited:
Certainly zoos have a huge part to play and I have no doubt that more compelling exhibits are key, but public interest will need to be piqued.
Well SeaWorld can be accredited for the popularization of Orcas and Bottlenose dolphins. Now their method of doing so was through shows, which I'm sure most people here disagree with. But it still shows that zoos can easily change the opinion of the public.
 
Well SeaWorld can be accredited for the popularization of Orcas and Bottlenose dolphins. Now their method of doing so was through shows, which I'm sure most people here disagree with. But it still shows that zoos can easily change the opinion of the public.
Well..."easily"...
Get your tickets now for the Greater Sand Grouse Show! Watch 'em fly! er, no, but Watch 'em run around! You'll insta it to death!!!!!
 
Well SeaWorld can be accredited for the popularization of Orcas and Bottlenose dolphins. Now their method of doing so was through shows, which I'm sure most people here disagree with. But it still shows that zoos can easily change the opinion of the public.
SeaWorld is also much more than a traditional zoo though- it is a tourist attraction in which the only other facilities in the country to rival it in name recognition are San Diego and Disney's Animal Kingdom. I highly doubt most other zoos, even ones like Saint Louis or Omaha, reach a wide enough audience to change public opinion this way.
 
SeaWorld is also much more than a traditional zoo though- it is a tourist attraction in which the only other facilities in the country to rival it in name recognition are San Diego and Disney's Animal Kingdom. I highly doubt most other zoos, even ones like Saint Louis or Omaha, reach a wide enough audience to change public opinion this way.
Yes but if done correctly it can greatly influence the surrounding communities One other really good way I have seen work is the distribution of The ZOO TV shows.
Well..."easily"...
Get your tickets now for the Greater Sand Grouse Show! Watch 'em fly! er, no, but Watch 'em run around! You'll insta it to death!!!!!
If I ever design for a zoo or become a curator I will create a massive special exhibit for Sandgrouses purely out of spite of this comment.
 
Certainly zoos have a huge part to play and I have no doubt that more compelling exhibits are key, but public interest will need to be piqued.
Might I also bring up the popular book How to Exhibit a Bullfrog. One of the parables told in that story involves a man wanting to buy a bonobo for his zoo for the purpose of "popularity" but is instead asked why not exhibit a Bullfrog which has much more educational value as it is native.
What I'm getting at here is that compelling exhibits are how you interest the public. What SeaWorld did was interest people in these animals, you don't need shows to do that. They simply grabbed your interest and that's how you win the interest of the public, by grabbing their interest make a bullfrog exhibit as interesting as a bonobo exhibit and you have figured it out.
 
What I'm getting at here is that compelling exhibits are how you interest the public. What SeaWorld did was interest people in these animals, you don't need shows to do that.
I wouldn't really consider any of SeaWorld's orca exhibits "compelling", certainly not even close to the Bullfrog exhibit William Conway describes in his story.

Orcas are also just extremely popular animals that will have large visitor interest regardless of how they are exhibited (for example, Miami Seaquarium). This would also apply to other charismatic megafauna species such as Lions or Elephants.
 
Well..."easily"...
Get your tickets now for the Greater Sand Grouse Show! Watch 'em fly! er, no, but Watch 'em run around! You'll insta it to death!!!!!
No because like....I really would spam that on instagram....:oops::p
 
This is definitely a problem in American zoos, with every collection seemingly holding the same thing. This situation has repeatedly thwarted me from going to new zoos in the past as my family would say 'we've seen all the animals already...'. Looking through the zoo websites it was rather hard to find rarities to warrant visits to some collections. Nonetheless, I would say the general public definitely has this perception of homogenization and I wish zoos would make a bigger deal of unique species. I've observed how this can increase excitement and intrigue in an institution many times before, and I believe if more zoos make a big deal of rarities at the state, regional, or country level, guests will start to think that different zoos carry different things and may be more inclined to visit other zoos on vacation, etc.
 
Regarding animal popularity, it feels as is non-ABC animals only get popular by random chance and internet memes (the latter can be demonstrated by the study on proboscis monkeys and polish memes.)

Of course if people and zoos are going to try make obscure animals popular by the use of memes, it should be known that the popularity of the meme is not guaranteed and varies depending on the region which makes the popularity of animals very random.
 
Might I also bring up the popular book How to Exhibit a Bullfrog. One of the parables told in that story involves a man wanting to buy a bonobo for his zoo for the purpose of "popularity" but is instead asked why not exhibit a Bullfrog which has much more educational value as it is native.
What I'm getting at here is that compelling exhibits are how you interest the public. What SeaWorld did was interest people in these animals, you don't need shows to do that. They simply grabbed your interest and that's how you win the interest of the public, by grabbing their interest make a bullfrog exhibit as interesting as a bonobo exhibit and you have figured it out.

I thought you were joking about there being a book called "How to Exhibit a Bullfrog" but looked it up and suprisingly you were not, I'll be having a read of it soon, looks interesting.
 
I personally don't have a huge problemms, Zoo should focus on creating substaineble populations, in particular for endangered species. Which animals a choosen animals get choosen is a whole other story
 
I thought you were joking about there being a book called "How to Exhibit a Bullfrog" but looked it up and suprisingly you were not, I'll be having a read of it soon, looks interesting.
It's not a book - it is an eight-page article from the magazine Curator, published in 1968.
 
Back
Top