@TeaLovingDave you will have to remind me if you visited Stuttgart before or after the new Ape House opened.
After
@TeaLovingDave you will have to remind me if you visited Stuttgart before or after the new Ape House opened.
Aftermy visit was in 2015, and the above photograph was taken in 2018.
San Diego is the holy grail?
I'd like a quick show of hands from people who have heard anyone say the phrase "Holy Grail of zoos", or even "Holy Grail of [anything]".
The San Diego Zoo like said in this quote has a much larger focus on birds and reptiles than mammals. Safari Park, on the other hand, is much more focused on mammals than reptiles and birds. I have been to both zoos with my family and friends and both think the Safari Park was better and more memorable (My dad could remember the whole Safari Park but blanked when I mentioned the Elephant Oddesy). Normal people or muggles just enjoy big mammals more than reptiles or birds. This can show that people care more if a zoo says it's the biggest of the best because people expect to see bigger mammals from what they would find at their normal zoo. S yes the San Diego zoo can be overrated but you have to give a hand to their marketing department.I have to agree on San Diego. Given the amount of money one spends and the caliber at which the zoo has visitors believe it stands it, it is disappointing. Largely this is on the exhibit front especially when it comes to mammals (except for primates). Despite an amazing collection many of the enclosures for mammals are mediocre for a zoo of its caliber. Giraffe, lion, tiger, bears, rhinos are especially notable enough on this front. Yet many other exhibits are average at best, cougar, most hoofstock exhibits (especially the takin exhibit), kangaroo, koala, camel/promghorn, and aye-aye (if still held in that metal cage). For birds and reptiles the story is much better, yet for average visitors mammals are generally far more important.
This is not to say I did not enjoy myself at the San Diego Zoo. I did but it most definitely was not a top 3 zoo for me.
Don't know if it's been said, but Cincinnati is most definitely overrated IMO. The zoo in the late 90s and early 00s had an amazing and unique collection, but recently it's species list has plummeted and turned into basic ABC species. While the zoo has many plans to change it's plain Elephant habitat and still present concrete bear grottos, many exhibits such as Reptile House and Night Hunters are out of date, small habitats with underwhelming species. With the new Africa habitat opening, the Hippo exhibit is horrendously small considering how new it is.
Agreed. It's extremely disappointing...Aside from black rhinos and bonobos, compared to what it was, I feel as if conservation has been thrown out the window. Haven't heard from CREW in what feels like almost a decade. They even used to receive awards for breeding insects.
According to a You Tube channel I subscribe to (Zoo Tours) there is a new masterplan going in to 2022 which will address some of these issues.While the zoo has many plans to change it's plain Elephant habitat and still present concrete bear grottos, many exhibits such as Reptile House and Night Hunters are out of date, small habitats with underwhelming species. With the new Africa habitat opening, the Hippo exhibit is horrendously small considering how new it is.
Technically the master plan was initiated with Phase 1's Roo Valley last year. Sadly, no one knows what's going on with the bear grottoes, but the rhino expansion should be complete in 2023, and the Elephant Trek in 2025.According to a You Tube channel I subscribe to (Zoo Tours) there is a new masterplan going in to 2022 which will address some of these issues.
Looking at this photo of the Berlin Gorilla House, it looks to me as if the glass-fronted wood-chip floored area is an extension onto the older building at the back, perhaps using up part(?) of what was originally the visitor viewing area. Is that correct?. Is the public viewing area nowadays smaller than it was or even from outside the building?Well, that's why I said "to some extent" for Cologne - in their case it is the gorilla exhibit which I was thinking of. From memory, the Cologne bonobo exhibit is definitely superior.
As regards the ape housing at Wilhelma beyond the orangutan exhibit, from memory the outdoors exhibits are roughly equal in quality and size to those at Berlin, but the indoor exhibits are rather smaller (although they do provide more climbing equipment to be fair).
Compare:
Wilhelma
![]()
Berlin
![]()
@Moebelle runs that channel.According to a You Tube channel I subscribe to (Zoo Tours) there is a new masterplan going in to 2022 which will address some of these issues.
![]()
![]()
The two indoor rooms for gorillas, from more flattering angles.
Bizarrely there are no photos of the outdoors in the gallery, but with the possible exception of Jakarta it felt like the largest I'd ever seen.
I do love National Aquarium but I think it's a little overrated. I like the idea that it goes from the rainforest and shorline at the top to the colder, deeper waters at the bottom but it's a really dark aquarium and horrible crowd control.
And my personal favorite exhibit is their smallest - surviving through adaptation and it's always chaos there because it's hard to see and the mantis shrimp is always hiding because of guest noise. I just think it can be planned out better.