Sorry for the clickbait title, I'm not talking about claimed "sightings" or looking for proof that the animal is somehow not extinct.
I'm asking about seeing the animal alive in zoos in the 1930s.
Obviously there were people who were alive in the 1930s and saw a thylacine in a zoo, either Benjamin the last thylacine or some other thylacine before then.
And there are people who were alive in the 1930s who are still alive now.
What I'm wondering is if there's any overlap between those two groups. Is there a person still alive today who was alive before Benjamin died and saw it in person? (Or another thylacine, I'm not sure if the ones at the London Zoo for example would have higher odds since London has a higher population and is more visited than Hobart.)
I'm asking about seeing the animal alive in zoos in the 1930s.
Obviously there were people who were alive in the 1930s and saw a thylacine in a zoo, either Benjamin the last thylacine or some other thylacine before then.
And there are people who were alive in the 1930s who are still alive now.
What I'm wondering is if there's any overlap between those two groups. Is there a person still alive today who was alive before Benjamin died and saw it in person? (Or another thylacine, I'm not sure if the ones at the London Zoo for example would have higher odds since London has a higher population and is more visited than Hobart.)