Things people do that irritate you when you go to the zoo? #2

I don't think people are really mature at 18 years, and teenagers certainly are not mature, you may think this but you are not totally mature at those ages.
I agree, the brain isn't even fully developed until you are in your early to mid 20s so clearly it's not possible to be very mature when your brain isn't even developed all the way.
The original 'question' of this discussion was what age children should be to realize that they come to a zoo to look at the animals and not to go to the playground. With some people, this is different (as in me), but I think that after the age of 10, you should (start) realizing that you are going to the zoo to look at animals and not top play at the playground.
And any 10+ year olds who would rather play at the playground or do something else than look at animals would probably just stop going to zoos.
 
I don't think people are really mature at 18 years, and teenagers certainly are not mature, you may think this but you are not totally mature at those ages. The original 'question' of this discussion was what age children should be to realize that they come to a zoo to look at the animals and not to go to the playground. With some people, this is different (as in me), but I think that after the age of 10, you should (start) realizing that you are going to the zoo to look at animals and not top play at the playground.


I think Playgrounds are a waste of space in Zoos.
 
If that happened, that'd mean there'd be a lot more crying/upset kids in the zoo, leading to even more of the disruptive things that kids do on this thread (e.g. banging on glass)
The way zoos like Nashville and Omaha do playgrounds is honestly really smart, in the sense that they are out of the way of any major exhibits (or *are* their own exhibits), and allow kids to be kids and expend their energy before going around the zoo proper.
 
The way zoos like Nashville and Omaha do playgrounds is honestly really smart, in the sense that they are out of the way of any major exhibits (or *are* their own exhibits), and allow kids to be kids and expend their energy before going around the zoo proper.

New Zealand zoo’s all do playgrounds differently:

Wellington has low key interactive stuff (transport crates for kids to climb in etc.) running parallel to multiple exhibits. It gives the kids something to clown around on while the parents are viewing the animals a few metres away. It generally works well.

Hamilton Zoo has a designated playground that some genius decided to place at the entry/exit point. It’s the first thing kids see as you go in and either demand to go on it at the start for half an hour plus or repeatedly ask the WHOLE way around the zoo when they’re gonna get to the playground.

Auckland Zoo know the score. The obvious starting point is the savannah. Kids enjoy seeing the giraffes, the lions; before moving onto the elephants, NZ natives and South East Asia. The playground is in the middle of the zoo so by the time you get to it, parents are usually happy to stop for a break (at the nearby restaurant) while the kids go on the playground. Everyone continues refreshed and happy to explore the outskirts of the zoo.
 
New Zealand zoo’s all do playgrounds differently:

Wellington has low key interactive stuff (transport crates for kids to climb in etc.) running parallel to multiple exhibits. It gives the kids something to clown around on while the parents are viewing the animals a few metres away. It generally works well.

Hamilton Zoo has a designated playground that some genius decided to place at the entry/exit point. It’s the first thing kids see as you go in and either demand to go on it at the start for half an hour plus or repeatedly ask the WHOLE way around the zoo when they’re gonna get to the playground.

Auckland Zoo know the score. The obvious starting point is the savannah. Kids enjoy seeing the giraffes, the lions; before moving onto the elephants, NZ natives and South East Asia. The playground is in the middle of the zoo so by the time you get to it, parents are usually happy to stop for a break (at the nearby restaurant) while the kids go on the playground. Everyone continues refreshed and happy to explore the outskirts of the zoo.
That is smart!!!
 
Things that irritate me:

1) Crowds, I hate too many people
2) People getting the species wrong even though they have read the sign. (One lady was so sure a nyala was a bongo) even though they are different colours and female nyalas are polled
3) Children (and the odd adult) screaming at animals in a bid to try and get their attention
4) People putting phones for pictures in animals faces, just respect their personal space
5) Children moaning about wanting to go on a play area, you came to the zoo to see animals
6) People skipping the 'less exciting' animals

So many people in this community seem to be obsessed with gate keeping. I would rather the zoo be horrifically busy than struggling to to get people through the gates.
 
So many people in this community seem to be obsessed with gate keeping. I would rather the zoo be horrifically busy than struggling to to get people through the gates.
I somewhat agree, as zoological facilities are not the sort of facilities that need smaller crowds to the extent that something like an amusement park does for average visitor enjoyment. While it is certainly a better experience without crowds and being able to have up-close encounters and more time at each exhibit, most zoo exhibits are self paced and crowds should not be as detrimental as say wait times on a rollercoaster. I agree that it is better that zoos are supported with fuller crowds in order for better upkeep and funding for future projects and conservation purposes.
However, I also acknowledge that many in this community also strongly prefer or require quieter spaces for mental wellbeing.
 
The way zoos like Nashville and Omaha do playgrounds is honestly really smart, in the sense that they are out of the way of any major exhibits (or *are* their own exhibits), and allow kids to be kids and expend their energy before going around the zoo proper.
I think Omaha's Bay Family Children's Adventure Trails is some of the best zoo design out there. It doesn't really appeal to ZooChatters, sure, but that's not what its trying to be. It excellently combines the play areas with actual animal exhibits, which I think is important. That makes it different from any random school or park playground and helps the kids make a connection to nature while having loads of fun. Sure, I can think of a few ways to improve it (add some native plants, a little wooded area to play in, and bring back the squirrel monkeys) but even in its current state is easily one of the best zoo playgrounds out there, and perhaps one of the most impactful zoos exhibits ever.

This isn't really related to the genius of Omaha's playground but that big building behind the playground is a high school. Yes, a high school on zoo grounds.
 
i hate it when people don't know what kind of animal it is especially when there is a sign that has the name, eg. once someone thought an Indian rhinoceros was a hippopotamus.
Yes!!! Read the signs people, read the signs. Some of these people I’ll even misinform others. I’ve heard wallabies being called rabbits.
 
Last edited:
Yes!!! Read the signs people, read the signs. Some of these people I’ll even misinform others. I’ve heard wallabies being called rabbits.

Roughly 90% of the public will not read a sign even if they're standing next to it. They're far more likely however to ask someone that's working with the animal or presumed to be coming from working with the animal. Or they'll just pin it to the closest thing they know.
 
Roughly 90% of the public will not read a sign even if they're standing next to it. They're far more likely however to ask someone that's working with the animal or presumed to be coming from working with the animal. Or they'll just pin it to the closest thing they know.
Common sense is slowly dying out as far as I tell.
 
Back
Top